2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 2

    posted a message on The sets of 2021
    Really not a big fan of D&D and Magic intermingling like this.

    Also not a fan of the Core Set being apparently missing. We already went through the "phase out the Core Set" thing didn't we, and realized it was a mistake?

    I'll be curious to see how color balance works in either of the Innistrad sets. Like in Werewolves, RG is the werewolves, white can be slayers...what do the other two colors do? White and blue get left out in both these cases.

    Oddly enough, I'm most excited for Strixhaven. It'll be fun for a deep dive at what a magical college might look like, other than the passing references we get from Tolaria. If they don't lean too heavily on Harry Potter, this could be cool.

    Cue Tiro of Meletis post: "Pretty disappointing that this isn't Theros and/or Kamigawa, which have objectively superior flavor."
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on [CMR] Commander Legends Previews from CommandFest 2
    Quote from Chalsis »
    Quote from beren camlost »
    Hal and Alena finally getting cards is absolutely a good call.

    I admire that they have individual cards, but also partner. I'd love to see this for Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis.

    Partner being in the set seems to imply we may get reprints of the C16 legends? That would be amazing. May not get them all, though. But Partner appearing in a draftable Commander set definitely makes sense. Allows for diverse, flexible play.

    I hope see Pavios and Thanasis in the future.

    I'd be feeling the lands if they weren't Kylem themed. Meh.

    Without fail, when I'm looking at new spoilers, I'll scroll down through the comments and usually by the end of the first page find one reply that irks me, usually because it's complaining in some petty way about the reveal.

    Then usually the second part of that reply, there will be a comment about how the post wishes this new card/product had been connected to Theros somehow. Without fail, it will be this account.

    It's fine to put your perpetually negative two cents in, and I guess it's fine to constantly lobby for more Theros, but do you really need to reply to this post 7 different times? At what point does a community member get flagged as a spammer? Really asking.


    I'm actually with Tiro here. Vorthoses (Vorthi?) tend to get caught up on weird things like art, and I really don't like Kylem either. Had these illustrations featured Dominaria, Lorwyn, Kamigawa, Shandalar, Eldraine, Theros, Tarkir, New Phyrexia, or Innistrad, I'd be properly hyped, but as it is, I'm not all that interested.

    I realize how ridiculous that sounds, and you're welcome to think it's stupid, since it's just not the way most Magic players tend to think. The notion that cool lands like these could be printed and that the art, of all things (which has nothing to do with gameplay anyway), should turn off certain players off sounds, perhaps, laughably absurd. I'm not even going to try defending it as rational - it can't be defended with logic. But as someone who would never put Kylem-themed art in one of my decks, I get it. It's purely an emotional response, and Kylem itself is off-putting to me.

    More lands for you, I guess. Smile
    Glad to see another Vorthos that understands my perspective. I think it's entirely rational really - MTG are not playing cards, there's art for a reason, and if there weren't people with this perspective we wouldn't have the name Vorthos to being with.

    That said, it's also strange to me that my post was called negative when it was actually largely positive with one critique rooted in personal and justified opinion. Kylem is rather shallow, isn't fleshed out in the lore and isn't aesthetically pleasing to me. The lands themselves are strong of course.

    If you don't know what I'm referring to when I say that your posts are usually negative, I encourage you to click on your own user profile and choose "view posts" and just scroll through.

    I'm not kidding about the spam. I think we can all agree to assume that any new information comes out will meet your disapproval unless it's Theros-related. There, you don't have to post anymore!
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on [CMR] Commander Legends Previews from CommandFest 2
    Hal and Alena finally getting cards is absolutely a good call.

    I admire that they have individual cards, but also partner. I'd love to see this for Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis.

    Partner being in the set seems to imply we may get reprints of the C16 legends? That would be amazing. May not get them all, though. But Partner appearing in a draftable Commander set definitely makes sense. Allows for diverse, flexible play.

    I hope see Pavios and Thanasis in the future.

    I'd be feeling the lands if they weren't Kylem themed. Meh.

    Without fail, when I'm looking at new spoilers, I'll scroll down through the comments and usually by the end of the first page find one reply that irks me, usually because it's complaining in some petty way about the reveal.

    Then usually the second part of that reply, there will be a comment about how the post wishes this new card/product had been connected to Theros somehow. Without fail, it will be this account.

    It's fine to put your perpetually negative two cents in, and I guess it's fine to constantly lobby for more Theros, but do you really need to reply to this post 7 different times? At what point does a community member get flagged as a spammer? Really asking.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on War of the Spark preview panel from PAX
    Vraska at uncommon = decent way to do it. We already had a mythic version of her from Ravnica, so makes sense that she doesn't need another.

    Wouldn't be surprised if each of the 5 guild leader PWs get the same uncommon treatment.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Rainbow druid and ravange of the fallen
    "changed the Grull conception"? I don't think you'd see one of the guild names misspelled on a real card.
    Posted in: Rumor Mill Archive
  • 1

    posted a message on Off-Guild Cards
    Cards in Guilds of Ravnica that "belong" to one of the other five (RNA) guilds (either specifically demarcated as such or implied by flavor):

    Gruul:
    Maniacal Rage
    Rubblebelt Boar
    Street Riot

    Azorius:
    Luminous Bonds
    Capture Sphere? (Similar to a Detention Sphere)
    Muse Drake? (Azorius building in the background)

    Orzhov:
    Veiled Shade?

    Rakdos:
    Hellkite Whelp
    Dead Weight? (The dungeon setting seems like a fit)

    TOTAL: 6-9

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    Cards in Ravnica Allegiance that belong to the other (GRN) guilds

    Boros:
    Angelic Exaltation
    Archway Angel? (Typically, Gate cards are purposefully unaligned or belong to the sort of eleventh faction, the "Gateless," but her white-and-red outfit and the prevalence of armored angels in Boros leans me towards Boros. See Gates Ablaze as a Gates-mechanic card tied to a guild)

    Dimir:
    Clear the Mind
    Eyes Everywhere? (Nothing in the execution labels this as Dimir, but as the surveillance guild there's an argument to be made)
    Mass Manipulation
    Thought Collapse
    Wall of Lost Thoughts

    Izzet:
    Swirling Torrent (Izzet are responsible for public works such as water supply systems)
    Electrodominance
    Gates Ablaze

    Golgari:
    Awaken the Erstwhile
    Carrion Imp
    Catacomb Crocodile?
    Noxious Groodion (the only other Groodion was Golgari; deathtouch, art, and flavor all fit)
    Undercity Scavenger
    Undercity's Embrace

    Selesnya:
    Sagittars' Volley

    TOTAL: 14-17

    Conclusion: If you were looking at the spoiler and it felt like the GRN guilds were represented more than you expected, it wasn't just your imagination. Dimir and Golgari were especially spotlighted.

    Not sure why. I think it's good to have reminders that the other five non-spotlighted guilds are still around, but one would expect more consistency among numbers--not zero (Simic) or one appearance for some (Selesnya, Orzhov) and 5-6 for others (Dimir, Golgari).
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Upcoming Norse-Inspired Set

    Saying a critique now is getting upset? lol.

    You call saying "meh" a critique? A critique means detailed analysis, which is impossible given zero information.

    Ever since Innistrad successfully channeled Gothic horror tropes, they've been big on world building around "resonance": Egyptian, Greek mythology, age of discovery, etc. They were bound to get around to revisiting Viking/Norse more fully. Some early Ice Age art drew on its influences (for example), but it's been long enough to give it a proper treatment, just as early Arabian Nights didn't rule out Amonkhet. I'm not sure a perceived Viking/Norse trend from a few years back would be as much a motivator as just trying to expand to incorporate as many types of cultural fantasy as possible. (Btw, you could have added Thor to the list.)
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Who Shall Fall to Bolas? MaRo's hints
    Any reason no one's considering Daretti, who is now BR and who (somewhat randomly) appears in the GRN Planeswalker Masterpieces?
    Posted in: Speculation
  • 1

    posted a message on March of the Multitudes
    Hey, they finally printed the Selesnya X-Spell.

    For reference:
    Azorius
    Dimir
    Rakdos
    Gruul
    Orzhov
    Izzet
    Golgari
    Boros
    Simic
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Izoni, Thousand-Eyed Mana Source spoiler
    I mean, this is definitely a build-around. If you're getting 3 or fewer insects, she's overcosted, but she's also capable of producing 10+ insects, at which you're getting a deal. Takes work but don't dismiss it because the roof is pretty high.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.