The suspend keyword gained by a card exiled with Jhoira won't be retained once that card leaves exile; in general, an object that moves from one zone to another becomes a new object in its new zone (C.R. 400.7).
The text "That land doesn’t untap during its controller’s next untap step" on Winter's Night's ability expresses a continuous effect, in this case, one which lasts for the rest of the game since no duration is stated (even though the effect applies only during a particular untap step) (C.R. 611.2a). The effect will continue even after Winter's Night leaves the battlefield.
The text doesn't express a delayed triggered ability since it lacks "when", "at", and "whenever" (see also Undiscovered Paradise [C.R. 108.1]) (C.R. 603.7).
With Gleeful Demolition, you need only have controlled the artifact in question in order to create the tokens; that artifact need not have been destroyed.
Gleeful Demolition doesn't say "If you controlled that artifact and it was destroyed this way, ..." Compare Gleeful Demolition with Tuktuk Scrapper.
Spiteful Bully's ability can target any "creature you control", even if that's Spiteful Bully itself or another creature named Spiteful Bully (C.R. 115.1a).
If you cast a spell that makes the "When you next cast a spell..." ability from Lucea trigger, that spell will be copied when the ability resolves, even if the spell has left the stack in the meantime, using the spell's last-known information (C.R. 608.2h).
Azor's Elocutors will still have its counters despite Solemnity, which doesn't remove any counters from anything.
Indeed, when Azor's Elocutors's first ability resolves it will do as much as it can (C.R. 101.3, 609.3). The ability doesn't say, for example, "...put a filibuster counter on Azor’s Elocutors. If you do, if Azor’s Elocutors has..."
A prototype card will have only its normal mana cost, power, and toughness (e.g., mana cost 7 and power and toughness 4/3 in the case of Arcane Proxy) if it enters the battlefield by any means other than resolving from a prototyped spell (C.R. 719.4). An exception is if it enters the battlefield as a copy of a permanent that was a prototyped spell (C.R. 719.3d).
For purposes of Visions of Ruin, a double-faced card (modal or otherwise) in the command zone has only the front face's characteristics (C.R. 712.4a).
Remember that in general, you can choose between a modal double-faced card's front or back face only at the moment you're playing or casting that card (C.R. 712.7, 712.8), and not when you're moving it from one zone to another for any other reason.
Note that if you cast Visions of Ruin with flashback, its cost reduction can reduce its cost by more than 8 if it would otherwise have more than eight generic mana in its cost (e.g., due to Thalia, Guardian of Thraben) (C.R. 601.2f). This cost reduction doesn't reduce the "flashback cost" (which is 8RR) (C.R. 702.1a), but rather the cost of the spell. Compare Visions of Ruin with Henzie "Toolbox" Torre; see also:
With Hypergenesis, if you put Hushbringer onto the battlefield, no abilities will trigger upon a creature entering the battlefield, whether a future one or one entering at the same time as Hushbringer. Thus, Denizen of the Deep's ability won't trigger if trigger enters while or after Hushbringer does, due to Hypergenesis.
Moreover, any ability that does trigger while a spell (such as Hypergenesis) is resolving won't go on the stack until after that spell resolves.
Does activating the ability of vanishing prevents removal of the enchanted creatures and whatever is attached to it from boardwipes?
In general, a permanent that's phased out is treated as nonexistent and unaffected by the game, "[e]xcept for rules and effects that specifically mention phased-out permanents" (C.R. 702.26b). For example, none of the six spells named below will affect a phased-out permanent. Moreover, when "a permanent phases out, any Auras, Equipment, or Fortifications attached to that permanent phase out at the same time" (C.R. 702.26g).
Note that the game has no notion of "board wipes" as such. There are numerous spells that can negatively affect all permanents of a certain kind on the battlefield at the same time — Wrath of God, Blasphemous Act, Armageddon, Obliterate, Upheaval, Decree of Annihilation, and so on — and they don't all affect the permanents they apply to in the same way.
In general, a token that's a copy of the enchanted creature will have that creature's copiable values, including its name and whether it's legendary (C.R. 707.2).
Note that the legend rule (C.R. 704.5j) says: "If a player controls two or more legendary permanents with the same name, that player chooses one of them, and the rest are put into their owners’ graveyards." This is the case even if some or all of those permanents are tokens (C.R. 111.6).
Moreover, if the token is a creature, it's subject to C.R. 302.6 (informally called the "summoning sickness" rule) just like other creatures (C.R. 111.6).
The intent may be that some player or other puts a creature onto the battlefield when a permanent spell resolves as a creature, but unfortunately, this intent might not be reflected sufficiently in the comprehensive rules. (Whoever believes otherwise should cite where the comprehensive rules provide explicitly that a specific player puts a resolving permanent spell onto the battlefield.) This is far from the only shortcoming of this kind in the comprehensive rules. Others include:
In a number of other cases, such as when new cards such as Nest of Scarabs start to care who puts counters on an object, the rules are adjusted to accommodate such cards.
C.R. 608.3a says that as a permanent spell with no target resolves, "it becomes a permanent and enters the battlefield under the control of the spell’s controller", without stating explicitly that a particular player puts that object onto the battlefield this way. Hence the argument that a player "put[ting] a creature card onto the battlefield" does not include nearly all cases when a permanent spell resolves as a creature.
- https://twitter.com/WotC_Matt/status/1616552617156673538
See also C.R. 113.2c as well as:
- https://www.reddit.com/r/mtgrules/comments/10hhk3w/stacking_toxic/
The text doesn't express a delayed triggered ability since it lacks "when", "at", and "whenever" (see also Undiscovered Paradise [C.R. 108.1]) (C.R. 603.7).
See also:
- https://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/magic-fundamentals/magic-rulings/776288-doesnt-untap-during-its-controllers-next-untap
- https://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/magic-fundamentals/magic-rulings/792783-what-happens-to-planewalker-abilities-after-they
- https://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/magic-fundamentals/magic-rulings/774925-confused-about-take-into-custody
Gleeful Demolition doesn't say "If you controlled that artifact and it was destroyed this way, ..." Compare Gleeful Demolition with Tuktuk Scrapper.
See also:
- https://www.reddit.com/r/mtgrules/comments/10656ht/question_about_new_warhammer_deck_i_picked_up
- https://www.reddit.com/r/mtgrules/comments/r1w060/interaction_between_possibility_storm_rule_of_law/
- https://www.reddit.com/r/mtgrules/comments/xc8mfk/question_regarding_the_spells_cast_by_neera_wild/
- https://www.reddit.com/r/mtgrules/comments/x657qe/shattering_spree_and_chalice/
- https://www.reddit.com/r/mtgrules/comments/qc70fa/volo_followup/
Indeed, when Azor's Elocutors's first ability resolves it will do as much as it can (C.R. 101.3, 609.3). The ability doesn't say, for example, "...put a filibuster counter on Azor’s Elocutors. If you do, if Azor’s Elocutors has..."
Compare—
Remember that in general, you can choose between a modal double-faced card's front or back face only at the moment you're playing or casting that card (C.R. 712.7, 712.8), and not when you're moving it from one zone to another for any other reason.
Note that if you cast Visions of Ruin with flashback, its cost reduction can reduce its cost by more than 8 if it would otherwise have more than eight generic mana in its cost (e.g., due to Thalia, Guardian of Thraben) (C.R. 601.2f). This cost reduction doesn't reduce the "flashback cost" (which is 8RR) (C.R. 702.1a), but rather the cost of the spell. Compare Visions of Ruin with Henzie "Toolbox" Torre; see also:
Moreover, any ability that does trigger while a spell (such as Hypergenesis) is resolving won't go on the stack until after that spell resolves.
Note that the game has no notion of "board wipes" as such. There are numerous spells that can negatively affect all permanents of a certain kind on the battlefield at the same time — Wrath of God, Blasphemous Act, Armageddon, Obliterate, Upheaval, Decree of Annihilation, and so on — and they don't all affect the permanents they apply to in the same way.
Note that the legend rule (C.R. 704.5j) says: "If a player controls two or more legendary permanents with the same name, that player chooses one of them, and the rest are put into their owners’ graveyards." This is the case even if some or all of those permanents are tokens (C.R. 111.6).
Moreover, if the token is a creature, it's subject to C.R. 302.6 (informally called the "summoning sickness" rule) just like other creatures (C.R. 111.6).
In a number of other cases, such as when new cards such as Nest of Scarabs start to care who puts counters on an object, the rules are adjusted to accommodate such cards.