MTG Salvation

Mind, you need to cross vote him if he has two votes because he's mechanically confirmed scum to you. Just FYI. I'll follow you on to him and zomg can pick, I guess.

I mean. It's not though? It's you or him, and I kind of think you'd kill D_V just for the wine.
But we'll see what the vote count says.

It's also not lylo, but mylo. Problem is that no lynching just puts us back in this position tomorrow anyway, I would guess (me choosing between you two). Like I said before, if your role has a restriction on votes it probably just says you can't lynch someone alone which doesn't tell me jack diddly about your alignment.

Dear god if it's Mindreaver I'll eat my hat.

Ok, that cross post convinced me. There's no way that mindmeld happens from scum.

It has to be Huntz. I'll probably put that vote down sometime toMorrow after zomg posts unless one of them makes a very good case.

Yeah, I don't get it either.

Well, I do kind of. Wine can be a powerful tool.

Problem is that if it is him he's relying on me tinfoiling on you and you tinfoiling on me so badly we vote each other, essentially.
I wish D_V hadn't hammered and I could've asked GJ why he wanted you instead of Huntz first.
But I think he was just relying on the double vote to clear him. Which I'm not willing to rely on with Proph in the set-up.

Maybe he just figured he was dead either way so he killed D_V for giggles.

My only problem really is that I did most of the talking in the QT.
So like. I guess it's possible that you were just trying to pocket me and that's why I'm still alive.
And you just agreed with whatever I said in the QT.
(Like I said, if it's you I did the work for you. Which sucks.)

But I still think it's just Huntz.
I'd like him to answer your question, though, and I'd like zomg to chime in which I guess won't be until noon tomorrow?

What is even going on right now?

Is it really just Huntz?

We could no lynch, but that just kills me or zomg... but then, I've been thinking we were going to die the last two nights and it isn't happening.

Sigh. Ok. If it's Mindreaver, he snowed me good and he deserves it.



I'll wait for everyone else to chime in first, but I don't really see how it could be anyone but Huntz.

Honestly, Huntz reminds me a lot of GoldenEye. And he hasn't really done anything, just come in and thrown his votes down and left again.
Like, if it wasn't for PoE he'd just be a null, but I don't think I'm comfortable lynching Mindreaver over him.

Hopefully you're right and it's just Vaimes, I guess.

He probably missed you lol.
Don't worry, you're in good company since he missed Tordeck, too.

Proph claimed first and is a confirmed vanillaizer. How could he know there were roles in the game that could win independently if it wasn't in his role PM? Took a shot in the dark and got lucky?

Or are you saying you think there's only one scum left? I wouldn't be so sure - Star Trek had a five man scum team plus an SK in a 19 man. A four man scum team with two neutrals, one of which is more pro-town than pro-scum, isn't too far fetched for a 17 man after that in my mind.

Also, Huntz is right, I think if Vaimes was the last scum he would've just given up instead of vanishing to avoid spew.

^ assuming there were four scum and not three, that is.

Quote from Gentleman Johnny »

I am trying to figure out whether it's two scum or three, if we can actually lose going Vaimes/Mindreaver/Hunt. I think we only lose if DV is scum in that particular set-up.

I mean, we'll lose as soon as we mislynch. Even if it's Vaimes/Huntz left we'll lose if we lynch Mindreaver and he flips town. If not for Proph we'd be in lylo right now, and he leaves at dawn on D7 at the lastest which is where you want to lynch Huntz. It'll be too late then. We have to nail the scum team exactly and lynch them all in a row.

@GJ:
Did you get to see what D_V and Mindreaver's unlockable abilities were, or did you just get their triggers?

Doubtful? If it's worded the way Proph says it is there's no distinction between the two. Is it tied to your use of your regular ability in some way, maybe?