However, a remand on one of your opponents 23/1 Lightning Serpent is way better. However, it really isn't a question of which of them you should play with, cause you can play with em both. Double da fun!
I don't see how that example works. Delaying the Lightning Serpent makes it useless after the 3 turns are over, as its will be a 0/1. Remanding a 23/1 Lightning Serpent will only get you hit by a 24/1 Lightning Serpent next turn.
We've pretty much established that there is no reason to hide your respondendt number unless you're afraid the real person with that number will call you out.
How is this card horrible? Hold two of them in hand and let your opponent try to alpha strike you until they're dead. Good vs Gruul and WW moreso than say just a finisher like Akroma, but even so. I don't see how this card is bad at all.
Well, they could do better. forwarding from gleemax.com to wizards.com isn't 'lost control'. but if wizards.com would forward to gleemax.com, it would be something like lost control
I don't know much about web designing but I'm going to assume it's easier to make a blank site that links to their already well-developed one rather than copying the entire current site to a new name. Maybe it's the easiest thing ever though, I wouldn't know.
While it may look like an error or being pointless, it's clearly an indication that Gleemax has taken over the internet portion of Magic, at least in terms of this little game they're playing.
Instead of wizards.com (wotc being the owner) it's gleemax.com (gleemax being the new owner) Same site, new boss
Yes I know, I'm a master of the obvious but I think the websitem redirection is perfect flavor-wise for their little riddle so I thought I'd point it out
This will become harder and harder to figure out as more and more people lie about their involvement...
If you got a brain, give your number so we can keep track of who has responded publicly. If it specifically tells you not to give it out, then say that instead.
Maybe it's like Charlie and the Chocolate Factory? Heh.
ps: nothing against you Madding its just funny how so many May subscribers are posting so much so soon.
I was always an avid reader, and finally decided to pitch my 2 cents in. Expect a lot of posts from me as I work 8 hour days mon-fri and have internet access that entire time.
What's gotten into people lately? First people are believing that 'Venserthenewplaneswalker' is Maro, when told by 'Venserthenewplaneswalker2,' without ever asking for why such a claim was made.
And now this, a completely random card that's too strong in an already strong anti-aggro format? This card won't see print, and people can quote me or w/e floats their boat if they want.
Has anyone really tested them out before just assuming?
I adored Nimbus Maze, only to find it was really a poor card in your opening hand without a hallowed fountain. Don't let Flagstones out of your deck because of this overrated card. So extensive testing in a strong u/w control deck has warranted this card inferior to most other options, in my case.
Does anyone have similiar personal test experiences with the others? Please share.
I don't see River of Tears as good, but I am not a draw-go player and really need to hear how it's been in testing before making a final judgement.
RB and GW I like, but after Ravnica rotates I see Horizon Canopy seeing much less play.
I really like the RG one, but people are just obsessed with RG being GRULL MUST CRUSH!.dec so they are overlooking it.
I'd say the worst one is Nimbus Maze, and after Rav rotates I'll frown upon Horizon Canopy.
But seeing as Vedalken is about as sci-fi as Magic gets, (With what they generally take as professions at least,) I don't see them in Lorwyn.
Arcian seems to be a faker, IMO.
I don't see how that example works. Delaying the Lightning Serpent makes it useless after the 3 turns are over, as its will be a 0/1. Remanding a 23/1 Lightning Serpent will only get you hit by a 24/1 Lightning Serpent next turn.
I've yet to recieve an answer to my email.
I don't know much about web designing but I'm going to assume it's easier to make a blank site that links to their already well-developed one rather than copying the entire current site to a new name. Maybe it's the easiest thing ever though, I wouldn't know.
Instead of wizards.com (wotc being the owner) it's gleemax.com (gleemax being the new owner) Same site, new boss
Yes I know, I'm a master of the obvious but I think the websitem redirection is perfect flavor-wise for their little riddle so I thought I'd point it out
They've 'lost control'
If you got a brain, give your number so we can keep track of who has responded publicly. If it specifically tells you not to give it out, then say that instead.
Maybe it's like Charlie and the Chocolate Factory? Heh.
I was always an avid reader, and finally decided to pitch my 2 cents in. Expect a lot of posts from me as I work 8 hour days mon-fri and have internet access that entire time.
And now this, a completely random card that's too strong in an already strong anti-aggro format? This card won't see print, and people can quote me or w/e floats their boat if they want.
Maybe I'm just being pessimistic.
I adored Nimbus Maze, only to find it was really a poor card in your opening hand without a hallowed fountain. Don't let Flagstones out of your deck because of this overrated card. So extensive testing in a strong u/w control deck has warranted this card inferior to most other options, in my case.
Does anyone have similiar personal test experiences with the others? Please share.
I don't see River of Tears as good, but I am not a draw-go player and really need to hear how it's been in testing before making a final judgement.
RB and GW I like, but after Ravnica rotates I see Horizon Canopy seeing much less play.
I really like the RG one, but people are just obsessed with RG being GRULL MUST CRUSH!.dec so they are overlooking it.
I'd say the worst one is Nimbus Maze, and after Rav rotates I'll frown upon Horizon Canopy.