2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on Ban announcement on March 9th
    Oh I Have. In fact it was the first modern deck I put together so I have much experience. But with the recent banning of mox opal it has been significantly downgraded. The real concern wouldnt be affinity it would be urza and hardened scale decks as they could probably use the lands to greater effect.5. For that reason I doubt it would happen. But it would be nice to see them revive affinity somehow.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Ban announcement on March 9th
    Honestly oko should be deleted from the game.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Ban announcement on March 9th
    Hoping for some unbans in modern.
    Possibly Splinter twin? Preordain?
    Maybe artifact lands?
    Banning veil of summer would be nice too.
    wouldnt be too crazy to see a tron piece go too.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Secret Lair - International Women's Day 2020
    <snip>
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Secret Lair - International Women's Day 2020
    Lets see the false equivalence here


    player A: dislikes liberal views and viewpoints thus believes anything that can be seen as virtue signaling is an attempt to pander and gets very annoyed.

    Player B: says “this product isnt for you”


    on the other side


    Player A: dislikes conservatives views and viewpoints thus believes anyone associated with those views are mean or hateful and shouldnt be associated with the game.


    Player B: Says “that artists product isnt for you”


    Or how about

    Player A: dislikes the patronizing direction the game has taken thus complains about it


    Player B: says “this game isnt for everyone.”


    on the flipside

    Player A: is of a minority group and whines about no representation


    Player B: says “this game isnt for everyone”



    now please, where is false equivalence? Its very true that you guys only defend your political viewpoints and are only inclusive to those who you deem worthy. Thats all im saying.

    God forbid we say
    “I hope theres a secret lair with male characters only”
    Or we are incels, or sexists or whatever. Its just severely hypocritical of you all to do that.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Secret Lair - International Women's Day 2020
    Why does everyone keep saying this
    “Not all products are for all players!”
    “You dont have to buy it!”
    “This product isnt for everyone!”


    Where were you guys when Therese Nielson was getting shat on? Did anyone of you say her art’s not for everyone? Or did you at least support her and tell people to just ignore her art or any of that? Or that she was entitled to her opinion? I didnt see any of you support her right to her opinion in the discussions of it. None of you had the sentiment of “its not for everyone” but how come you do now?


    did any of you tell that girl that cried about garruk beat up liliana that this games isnt for everyone? Or that that card isnt for everyone?


    what about when ppl start crying about not being included? Did you tell them that the game is not for everyone?


    You see the very clear bias here. This game had none of that and many of you cried about it not being as inclusive enough years back. You cried about too many white males and the women were “objectified” etc etc well why didnt you realize then that this game wasnt for you? Or that you didnt have to buy the product? No, you kept complaining pushing and pushing until finally the game changed to include you.


    But now that you’ve gotten your way you have the verve to tell players who have played for 15+ years that the product isnt for everyone, how can say with a straight face “this isnt for everyone” when others have complaints.


    Well im here to tell you we’re going to keep complaining and we are all going to keep seeing the game decline just as it did last year as they pushed all sorts of crap out their doors and continued to show us incompetency of the highest order as well as shallow and patronizing inclusivity that really made you all froth at the mouth.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Secret Lair - International Women's Day 2020
    Indeed they are real and you express real concerns seeing real world issue first hand of this. Whats somewhat ironic is during desegregation of schools some people said that this very thing would happen and they were called racist. Granted some indeed were. But there were some who were not and knew that mixing all students like that would cause some to fall behind severely and some to excel. Just as you point out above. This is a perfect example of how some forced "diversity" and "equality" measures actually lead to some very measurable, and significantly damaging repercussions. Now I am not advocating for desegregation but we observe how empathy at all costs has lead to some very poor decision making and that has had lasting negative results in something this imortant. Its actually very observable and some such as Dr. Umar Johnson have demonstrated how young black students would excel if they were not in a mixed class or lead by a white professor in fact he actually advocates to segregate schools so that the standards could be more specified to a people, a culture, and group interest. I implore you to listen to him though he is somewhat radical he does bring very many reasonable points to the table which merit an ear. I dont necessarily agree with him but it would be remiss of us not to acknowledge how instituting "equity" or "equality" and sacrificing quality over empathy has been for the most part damaging to many people. You see it first hand. This is indeed a touchy and sensitive topic and the correct path is very difficult to see as there are many variables but the fact remains things like schools have tools in place to observe equity and who needs help or not. MTG and media such as this does not have anything that we can use to measure a level of "empowerment" thus we are left here to observe the continuous pushing of propaganda that some deem needed and others deem excessive.

    California is a mess. I have alot of family there and its very clear what these types of politics has done to that state yet many seem to vehemently defend this push instead of stepping back and recognizing that all this empathy has lead to alot of poor decision making. I agree many people do need help that is for sure. Someone always needs help and that will be a fact for as long as humanity exists.

    And im not thinking youre insinuating anything you just said it yourself. You believe the kids or that system deserves more money because they are in a bad position. So theres that but again that money would go to making a MEASURABLE difference IE school performance, school funding etc etc. I think its interesting you put in details such as "no fault of their own" bc its very important for you that i feel some type of way or that it be known that "theyre unfortunate and its not their fault". Well yea. Things are indeed unfair, life is unfair and no amount of equity work or little card board drawings are going to change that no matter how much you believe that it will. Ill tell you this though its more likely the kids parents faults than the fault of that white privileged guy across town who you want to tax for that extra money though.



    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Secret Lair - International Women's Day 2020
    The elimination of subordinate behaviors and practices to ensure equality and fair treatment is not the same as giving someone something to "empower" them for the purpose of elevating them to a subjective level of power/popularity/status. The reason is that one is measurable and the other is not. This is the whole crux of the issue with this whole concept of "equity". Which let me remind you equity means impartial and fair. So giving one people something and another group nothing is the exact opposite of that even if you believe that one group already has an advantage or not. And I have huge problem with this because you use the word equity instead of what you really mean. Just say it. Say that women deserve more attention to make up for the lack of attention from years past. Dont say equity because thats not what this is. This is very clearly special attention/treatment to make up for what you and some others perceive to have been the lack of attention or special treatment in years past. Dont BS me with words that have been bastardized from their traditional and official definitions. Just say what you really mean and the conversation can go from there.

    To further show how this whole "equity" concept doesnt apply here is that very famous or infamous illustration of equity where the 3 individuals are watching a baseball game and two cannot see over the fence thus they are given boxes to ensure they can. We've all seen it. The reason that doesnt apply here is very simple and goes back to what I said. measurability.
    How many "boxes" will women have to recieve until they can see over the fence? Who determines when women have been empowered enough in the game? You? Then who decides what group will need empowerment next? This is why this whole idea doesnt work. You have warped what actual equity means which in real life circumstances are measurable due to the environmental/external circumstances that allow for the measurement to take place. In the illustration that would be the fence line. In kindergarten that would be something like reading level and to reach equity you give the slow readers extra attention/lessons until the whole class is brought up to a specific reading level. So i ask again at what point will the pandering stop? And at what point will men get the same attention? When do women have enough "boxes" under their feet to see over the "fenceline". What about the LGBT community? how many "boxes" do they have or will they get? And the black community? what about hispanics? and native americans?
    This is where this whole idea crumbles in my opinion. Why? because you cant please everyone especially the ones inundated with "empathy". That is why you tell me "its not for everyone" when I complain about a product. Well that is definitely the case and ive known that for years and years. MTG is not for is definitely not for everyone and in their mission to make it so they have warped it into the mess it has become and this leads to my next point.

    They are mutually exclusive when one is purposefully sacrificed for the other if you need examples of this I can happily provide them.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Secret Lair - International Women's Day 2020
    Back to normal is very easy to explain.
    Back to normal would be focus on the game, focus on the product with a sound plan not a money making scheme or lack of discipline/patience. Focus on building a team based on competency not on reaching some type of "woke" quota. Focus on story line that is composed of quality material not filled with pandering fluff. Focus on character building void of irrelevant clearly political fluff to build "inclusivity". This whole "equity" thing is unreasonable and very obviously flawed. Equity has no end game, there is no measurable amount of "equity" that is sufficient to the "woke" crowd that has taken over this game and you know it. What you mean by equity is advantage or special treatment so dont disguise what youre really asking for. I dont need to be empathetic to anyone. I respect everyone and thats enough. You all are too empathetic, youre drunk with it that no matter what happens youll never be happy with the level on "inclusivity" presented to you and we see this over and over and over especially here in this game. How many more years of this do you need until you say okay thats enough equity? Would it be best if all white males just got erased from the game? Would that be the point where the equity has quelled your empathy?

    virtue signaling has its appropriate time and place and WoTC thinks that time is every 4 hours and place is every other set. I dont mind them doing it but like i said they have done so much of it that now even things that are likely innocent is seen as another political pandering ploy especially when they have a very obvious and serious political bias.

    Lastly, you have to be somewhat oblivious if you think magic hasnt been suffering in terms of quality for some time now so saying im being "inconspicuously selfish" is being purposefully ignorant of the fact that the game suffers because the focus of the company is where it shouldnt be.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Secret Lair - International Women's Day 2020
    Could everyone please shut up about “virtue signaling” and all the other terms that act as a thin veil for you not liking women very much? If this product was all legendary male characters to celebrate Father’s Day or something none of you would have any issue with it.


    Virtue signaling is a thing though.. everyone likes women, in fact no one had a problem with liliana, nissa, chandra etc etc they were beloved by the fanbase. But its been so long that WOTC has been pandering hard that now any innocent thing is seen as pandering bc people just want the regular game back to normal without all the pandering. And the fact that they have never released a legendary male characters product kind of points to this being another pandering job. If i didnt like women id say it. There's no thin veil here its just getting old at this point.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Secret Lair - International Women's Day 2020
    *GASP* hOw dARe yOu?!?! You HAVE to buy this product or youre a BIGOT!!!!!!!
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Secret Lair - International Women's Day 2020
    If you listened to the MTG Finance podcast they actually talk about this many times. People do indeed suffer from wallet fatigue and it is because many feel that they have to buy the product or theyll miss the opportunity. So although you bring a good point in that we shoulnt make decisions based on anecdotes or use anecdotes as evidence. When anecdotes are all you have and you couple that with the fact that they are observed as the norm they stop being an anecdote at that point. And if you dont believe that this wallet fatigue and just product fatigue phenomenon is the norm I recommend you just scroll through these pages, listen to the MTG Finance podcast, read comments on youtube etc etc and you will see that your experience is the anecdote and Xcric is indeed onto something in pointing out that product fatigue is a perpetual and ongoing thing possibly due to peoples lack of fiscal discipline coupled with the feeling that an opportunity will be missed.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Ikoria Booster Art
    Its because they are focusing on their special edition product. Everything is half a**ed now until they find the golden egg they can ride for months until its eventually unpalatable due to over saturation.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Secret Lair - International Women's Day 2020
    i believe the izzet character youre talking about is doctor str..i mean ral!
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Secret Lair - International Women's Day 2020
    A more appropriate reciprocation would have been an equally sarcastic joke. And please YOU have the blessed day my good sir/ma’am/zir/za’am/(your pronoun here)
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.