I have played Bridge in Skred. The effect is powerful, but you need to be built to leverage it.
One of the big issues with Bridge is that it sort of invalidates the deck's primary plan: to control the opponent's creaturess by removing them, and quickly turn the corner and close out the game with powerful finishers that mostly work in the red zone. In addition to the creatures you named, Koth, Boros Reckoner, Glorybringer, Thunderbreak Regent, and more depend to some extent on attacking. While you can try to burn them out with PWs, PnKN, and so on, this is going to be much slower, and give the opponent a lot of time.
You need to have a plan to deal with the fact that Bridge invalidates a lot of your offense. That can mean relying more heavily on PWs, or using something like Rabblemaster to go sword-and-shield. If you don't do this, you're just a very bad Burning Bridges deck, and will lose many games because the opponent has enough time to find their outs or cobble together a plan B.
I like Fulgence's list quite a bit. It feels like an interesting and powerful hybrid strategy.
I was wondering if Fulgence has experimented with either Ramunap Excavator for value chains (including with a Canopy), or Magus of the Moon over Fulminator Mage, for a more readily castable land-disruption effect.
Also, does Fulgence stream? I would like to see this deck in action.
Enchanter's Bane is pretty niche and weak at what it does, and the effect is rarely necessary in Legacy. I wouldn't bother.
As for Flame Rift, it pays to have a set. It's one of my least favorite burn spells; but when you simply need big packets of efficient, direct damage; you don't do much better.
Mono-Red Prison is in an interesting spot. Miracles and DnT are significant portions of the meta, and that's bad for them. On the other hand, Delver decks (especially DSD), Loam decks, and Eldrazi are also significant portions of the meta, and that's good for them. Grixis Control can go either way, depending on the specific version. Also DSD has forced out many combo decks, which is also good for them. I don't play Red Prison in Legacy, but if I had it, I would certainly be willing to play it.
As for how Burn stacks up, well, combo is at an all-time low, fair blue and black decks are ascendant, Miracles is also rising, and DnT is moving away from Brightling because it's pretty bad versus Strix. In short, it seems like a good time to play Burn.
That's not what a "bear" is. "Bear" has always a term for a 2-power guy (if not an outright 2/2) for 2 mana; contrast with "Ogres" and "Hill Giants." This power level is important because it starts to move towards a semi-feasible clock. Dakra Mystic is no bear.
It mill effect is also atrocious, still not threatening a kill in under 20 turns (ie: even slower than its attack), and being mutual (ie: milling yourself).
I thought this card was so obviously horrendous that I interpreted your post as pure sarcasm, and actually laughed as I read it. I clearly misinterpreted your intention.
Eternal Skred is less punchy, but can grind better and has inevitability against a lot of decks. Dragon Skred closes games faster and is stronger against some creature based decks.
I'd make the argument you either play Vial or CoCo, not both. The former is trading card disadvantage for tempo and timing advantage. The latter is trading mana for card advantage and timing advantage. Both are dependent on a critical mass of creatures, and so too many work at cross purposes. Figure out which one your build would prefer, and build that way.
I have no strong opinion on 8-Seas (or 7-Seas, which is both more evocative and probably better), but I would think that even those decks would prioritize Vial.
I'm all for making the Magic community a more accepting and welcoming place. However, this article basically uses the same hyperbolic vitriol and political edge that has crept in everywhere. I hear enough politics (combined with evangelizing and calling people Nazis) basically everywhere else. Can we fix these issues without resorting to the same base behavior?
One of the big issues with Bridge is that it sort of invalidates the deck's primary plan: to control the opponent's creaturess by removing them, and quickly turn the corner and close out the game with powerful finishers that mostly work in the red zone. In addition to the creatures you named, Koth, Boros Reckoner, Glorybringer, Thunderbreak Regent, and more depend to some extent on attacking. While you can try to burn them out with PWs, PnKN, and so on, this is going to be much slower, and give the opponent a lot of time.
You need to have a plan to deal with the fact that Bridge invalidates a lot of your offense. That can mean relying more heavily on PWs, or using something like Rabblemaster to go sword-and-shield. If you don't do this, you're just a very bad Burning Bridges deck, and will lose many games because the opponent has enough time to find their outs or cobble together a plan B.
I was wondering if Fulgence has experimented with either Ramunap Excavator for value chains (including with a Canopy), or Magus of the Moon over Fulminator Mage, for a more readily castable land-disruption effect.
Also, does Fulgence stream? I would like to see this deck in action.
As for Flame Rift, it pays to have a set. It's one of my least favorite burn spells; but when you simply need big packets of efficient, direct damage; you don't do much better.
As for how Burn stacks up, well, combo is at an all-time low, fair blue and black decks are ascendant, Miracles is also rising, and DnT is moving away from Brightling because it's pretty bad versus Strix. In short, it seems like a good time to play Burn.
It mill effect is also atrocious, still not threatening a kill in under 20 turns (ie: even slower than its attack), and being mutual (ie: milling yourself).
I thought this card was so obviously horrendous that I interpreted your post as pure sarcasm, and actually laughed as I read it. I clearly misinterpreted your intention.