I strongly dislike TACKY, and have been souring on blue. I can't decide whether AK was just a ZDS sheep or what. ATM I'm liking role analysis over behavioral tho.
Ok, the deal on the switch thingie. I was a mason, so my mason buddy can now not only confirm me, but also the person I switched with, and no one needs to actually claim now. The involved parties understand the situation, and there are two people in the thread who can confirm me if need be. I don't find any convincing reason for them to claim at the moment, though.
IIRC, you said you can only do this once every 2 days, Anak?
Also, the more I think about the Buranri situation, RBing him makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. If they wanted to stop the switch, the scum could just have blocked Anak and Buranri's ability would be useless. It's far more likely that he's just lying for a bad claim.
I do still find the differences in PM wording fairly damning as well, BTW.
Could Buranri actually be both tracker and watcher?
Here's my thought process:
-He makes someone sticky at beginning of night (person X)
-Whoever interacts with that person (either they target person X, or person X targets them) gets transfer of stickiness
-At the end of night Buranri gets a summary of who is sticky, thus both watcher and tracker
This would explain the weird official title, and also makes sense with maple syrup as it does not discriminate who it is in contact with, or how it gets there.
This is actually reasonable, but what we know does make him, at the very least, a tracker. I am a bit thrown by the switch in terminology, but the claim is confirmable, there is no convincing reason to lynch Buranri ATM. The way he claimed, more or less unprompted, also seems unlikely as scum.
IF RafK isn't lying about his NK protection, and IF the ability tracks instead of watches, it seems hugely likely that lrd was our blocked NK last night.
Also would support RafK claiming the rest of the way.
Disagree. A town which cannot argue coherently or listen to sane arguments will lose. A strong argument is and should be the best leader, not any particular charismatic individual.
You're drastically undervaluing the importance of having confirmed townies, especially confirmed townies who scum can't target.
IIRC, you said you can only do this once every 2 days, Anak?
Also, the more I think about the Buranri situation, RBing him makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. If they wanted to stop the switch, the scum could just have blocked Anak and Buranri's ability would be useless. It's far more likely that he's just lying for a bad claim.
I do still find the differences in PM wording fairly damning as well, BTW.
Vote: Anaklusmos761
To be slightly less invasive, why don't you just tell us whether you targeted lrd with an ability or not. You can do that without fullclaiming.
IF RafK isn't lying about his NK protection, and IF the ability tracks instead of watches, it seems hugely likely that lrd was our blocked NK last night.
Also would support RafK claiming the rest of the way.
Do you get to see who the person your targeted targets, or do you get to see who targeted the person you targeted (Peter piper picked a peck....)?
You claimed watcher. Watcher traditionally gets to see who targeted the person you targeted.
Also, you're saying you received info on the actions of RafK and lrd, and neither of them did anything?
FTR, this wagon was unreal fast for as unclear as the situation was.
Also, any particular reason why you felt compelled to claim in this situation?