Quote from DYHThe last line kpaca has already brought to your attention, but it definitely reads like "will you look at this and determine it's how I react as a townie and move on, please?".
The overall impression I get from your posts is that you just want this pressure gone; not that you really want to resolve it.
First comment: The last line is Chris answering a specific question that was asked of him. You are definitely reading too much into it.
Second comment: What would it look like if he was trying to resolve it?
Quote from andelijahWe're 160 posts in. Why do alternatives need to be offered so soon?
If he got a "stupid wagon" read so soon and so easily, it's not unrealistic to expect of him to get a firm read on at least one other player.
And here's kpaca doing the same thing DYH did above. Chris was asked a straight question, responded to it, and now his straight answer is being presented as scummy. Why?Quote from kpacaDo you care to make judgements as to the alignment of any of the players, or are you just making a summary of the game for us to read
First, neither Skander nor SK are the top suspect (or at least have been at the time, I see Skander is now tied with Chris).Quote from Nom_AnorOn the other hand, I've not been liking Alx. I was a bit wary of his last post, and his most recent one is even worse.
So, this brings me to the question "what would scums do"? In the face of this wagon, they would probably be split between (a) trying to get on without really understanding the reasons, and (b) belittling the wagon without offering alternatives.
Skander and Shadow Knight!?
I don't see how this can possibly be good analysis--rather than looking at the two current wagons and trying to find out if they are scummy or not, he's taking them and looking for reasons he can make them out to be scummy--not to mention he's sitting on the fence by laying suspicion on both of the town's suspects.
Second, I did look at the top wagon. And I did "try to find out if he's scummy". Which is in a part of my post not shown here because you left it out of your quote.