I would like to direct your attention to the last paragraph. Do you see this? Person FOSes his own mason partner. This is not in a joke post, this isn't in any way, shape or form, anything other than either A) direct suspicion of said player or B) a direct attempt at distancing. You do NOT make this play if it is your mason partner. This is Person stepping up to get IS mislynched. Mason pairs don't often get inspected, and with the ploy they were about to run on day 2, even if one went down, the other was likely "clear".
I have been wondering about that post ever since it happens, and I gotta tell you, it makes absolutely no sense to me.
Straight and to the point, and another push at getting the IS lynch in before deadline. No mention of unassurendness of townhood. Guess who brings that up?
It's funny you should mention that. Why? Well, because I was waiting for someone to bring it up. I was wanting Person to say that he knew I was town, because I had no such assurances about him. This is why I IGNORED the question until he answered it.
Lovers. [Person] and Buttercup are traditional, old-school lovers. One is scum, the other is town.
J'Ville and Person can speak at night- they're scum. Along with Pineapple, most likely. Look at the way he distances the "mason partner" claiming in 230 and 268. Shaniqua also pushes away from the mason partner claiming in 222.
Well... no. If there are "traditional, old-school lovers" then it's me that's town and Person that is scum. He "did something" that second night (Night 1). It's possible that Buttercup had to bail him out when we claimed, because she knew that no one else would, and he'd be sunk. But if you want to lynch Person and see what information comes up that'd be peachy.
@squiggle: why am I more likely than Person, considering that after I accused him he said he was 100% sure I was town?
Well then I'll post, so that you can continue. I haven't really thought Pineapple was all that suspicious, but I agree completely with post 513. I was close to posting basically the exact same thing myself.
I'm the Housewife, 31.
I grew up in a loving home and married Person at 24 (to my family's disapproval). Then I found out he's not as nice as he used to be. He still brings in the money though and is a good husband.
Question for Person: Do you know when this affair started? If you do, I might believe you.
Oh wah. If you think Person is so clear then how come every night now I keep getting PMs telling me that he didn't do anything that night? Yes, I'm scum, that's why I'm getting PMs from fade telling me that Person got up during the night. Are you even thinking or are you just trying to defend your scum-buddy like Shaniqua did.
As for a doc, do we really have one? Don't you think he would have protected UM last night? Well, I'd like to think so anyway.
StMB: Again, wah. The deadline was imposed because NO ONE was talking. This game has turned into crap because 75% of the people don't feel like contributing.
I also think that if Person was innocent, there would be a heavier push for him right. (Oh yeah, and Shaniqua the scum wouldn't have "denounced" my thought process much like Buttercup is doing)
No, because that's exactly what I'm trying to say. He revealed his masonhood the night before he left the room to make the kill. Why exactly should my outlook change?
If I had to guess between Person and Johnson, I'd say it was Johnson, though. Hate the way he's been singlemindedly attacking person and ignoring ulterior arguments, despite the fact that the 'evidence' he claims to have really isn't that at all, and more a series of suppositions.
Ok, let's look at the evidence here, shall we?
1) Fade sends me a mason-esque role, I ask if my partner is confirmed town, he says no.
2) On night 2, my "husband" leaves the room at night.
3) On nights 1, 3 and 4, he doesn't leave the room.
4) Shaniqua (scum) says that my info is probably meaningless.
His behavior:
91: Votes AK and Foses stricken
116: Wants IS's age.
118: Says he wants the age because people mess up. Says he believes IS.
136: Foses his partner and votes IS.
159: Can't help but see IS lynched.
163: No opposition to IS being hammered
200: Not sure about IS
251: Is sure about lynching IS, also TLK is a good target
270: Comes out as a mason so that IS will be lynched
394: Says Shaniqua has a confirmable role.
Between his wishy-washyness on IS, his defense of Shaniqua, and Shaniqua denouncing my info, what do I think? Hmm... I think that the mafia assumed that Person claimed at the end of day 1 so that he would be seen as cleared, and he could do the nightkill without fear of being watched.
I wouldn't like to see a full-claim. Jobie in Hollywood Mafia investigated Sutherlands and got that Sutherlands wasn't dangerous, and was out of his room, allowing Jobie to go through his room and find a Simon Cowell poster. I find what UM is saying to be incredibly likely.
But at the same time... I still have to know why Shaniqua would claim the kill... unfortunately for her, I see it as likely that she generated this false-claim hoping to pull the WIFOM card of "why would I claim the kill" I'll keep my vote.
(This post was originally above godfathers in the wrong account. Nothing has changed. Sorry :()
It's funny you should mention that. Why? Well, because I was waiting for someone to bring it up. I was wanting Person to say that he knew I was town, because I had no such assurances about him. This is why I IGNORED the question until he answered it.
Well... no. If there are "traditional, old-school lovers" then it's me that's town and Person that is scum. He "did something" that second night (Night 1). It's possible that Buttercup had to bail him out when we claimed, because she knew that no one else would, and he'd be sunk. But if you want to lynch Person and see what information comes up that'd be peachy.
@squiggle: why am I more likely than Person, considering that after I accused him he said he was 100% sure I was town?
I'm the Housewife, 31.
I grew up in a loving home and married Person at 24 (to my family's disapproval). Then I found out he's not as nice as he used to be. He still brings in the money though and is a good husband.
Question for Person: Do you know when this affair started? If you do, I might believe you.
As for a doc, do we really have one? Don't you think he would have protected UM last night? Well, I'd like to think so anyway.
StMB: Again, wah. The deadline was imposed because NO ONE was talking. This game has turned into crap because 75% of the people don't feel like contributing.
I also think that if Person was innocent, there would be a heavier push for him right. (Oh yeah, and Shaniqua the scum wouldn't have "denounced" my thought process much like Buttercup is doing)
Ok, let's look at the evidence here, shall we?
1) Fade sends me a mason-esque role, I ask if my partner is confirmed town, he says no.
2) On night 2, my "husband" leaves the room at night.
3) On nights 1, 3 and 4, he doesn't leave the room.
4) Shaniqua (scum) says that my info is probably meaningless.
His behavior:
91: Votes AK and Foses stricken
116: Wants IS's age.
118: Says he wants the age because people mess up. Says he believes IS.
136: Foses his partner and votes IS.
159: Can't help but see IS lynched.
163: No opposition to IS being hammered
200: Not sure about IS
251: Is sure about lynching IS, also TLK is a good target
270: Comes out as a mason so that IS will be lynched
394: Says Shaniqua has a confirmable role.
Between his wishy-washyness on IS, his defense of Shaniqua, and Shaniqua denouncing my info, what do I think? Hmm... I think that the mafia assumed that Person claimed at the end of day 1 so that he would be seen as cleared, and he could do the nightkill without fear of being watched.
But at the same time... I still have to know why Shaniqua would claim the kill... unfortunately for her, I see it as likely that she generated this false-claim hoping to pull the WIFOM card of "why would I claim the kill" I'll keep my vote.