2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 1

    posted a message on
    Comment Hidden
    Link Removed
  • 1

    posted a message on [[Pauper]] The Pauper Cube Discussion Thread (Commons Only)
    The problem with Banding creatures is their horrible mana cost to body ratio. Sometimes the effect can be useful, but usually you want to have the cards do enough on their own. Reading paragraphs during the games isnt too great either, since the creatures lack the tooltip. Thats only a problem on the firsts drafts though.

    Maybe its because you play jut for a short period, but mana cost becomes never irrelevant, you want to have more plays a turn or bluff answers. Paying 5 for a 2/2 is huge tempoloss. You also want to have a reasonable mana curve in your deck.

    I also doubt the games go that long, unless your playgroup is as unexperienced. RG Beatz for example looks pretty fast to me. http://www.cubetutor.com/cubedeck/1042880

    Rot Wolf doesnt draw you cards, it gets ignored until you have 6-8 poison counters and then gets removed or chumped.

    Peregrine Drake is pretty mediocre. And as said, it sends wrong signals.

    A card can be nostalgic without being around at that time. Its just the flavor of the yesterdays that makes them interesting. We are playing paupercube and magic in general for a while here now and playtested a lot of cards. Many of the cards you run dont work, at least not in the general poweroriented and not even neccessarily in the archetype driven ones. As you see in my sig, i have both approaches.

    That said, I think its always cool to see something different, but right now your cube looks quite unbalanced. You run a lot of the powerful cards as well as the packfiller. Maybe you want to try to build an old school pauper cube with only the old frame? Or start there and then add more modern cards on the same powerlevel and bring more depths into some mechanics like morph. I dont think it works well the other way around (starting with a modern powerlevel and water it down with the old school stuff)
    Posted in: Pauper & Peasant Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Ravnica Allegiance Spoiler
    hmm
    Posted in: Pauper & Peasant Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on [[Pauper]] The "Evaluate Everything" Project
    hehe, too bad my playgroup fell apart with the years. some left town, others lost interest or dont have time because of family. so i almost exclusively play on xmage now, so my players are bound to my balances. some give good feedback, nobody complained about greens (almost) lack of removalmthough. i run cartouche, lignify and snakeform right now. but also a bunch of deathtouch creatures, which help against hexproof, fit the color better and overall do a good if not better job as plain removal. green basically ignores what the opponent does and smash faces.

    but yeah, the t1 lost some appeal for me over the years as well. partly because i played it so much, but also because the decks are so streamlined. when i created the cube i wanted legacy-like meta and thats kinda what it is, highly competitive, but lost a lot of limiteds durdly and interactive characteristic. thats why i like the t2 better, it has way more cute interactions than just brutal power and it runs different cards that you would see in constructed.
    that said, i mentioned it earlier, paupercubes in general play less diversified than vintagecubes and get old rather quick.
    So both cubes mixed together becoming a 720 card cube is the best experience. because you wont see the same decks and cards over and over again and it makes drafting for the cognizant cuber more interesting/random. i basically just stayed 360 in paper, because its so much hassle with shuffling, sleeving, maintaining and carrying 720 cards around. (but also twice the fun balancing them) but if youre not as lazy like me, i definitely recommend going 720 or 540 at least.

    EDIT:
    posted at the same time, eh.
    Ambuscade also opens yourself for 2:1s
    Posted in: Pauper & Peasant Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on
    Comment Hidden
    Link Removed
  • 1

    posted a message on [[Pauper]] The "Evaluate Everything" Project
    decrease all ratings by one level and youre good to go Wink
    Posted in: Pauper & Peasant Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on
    Comment Hidden
    Link Removed
  • 1

    posted a message on Holy ****, this game sucks as a "new" player
    I think the game is a horrible place to spend money on, because of the fast rotations and the unavailability of direct purchase of singles. If your goal is to play competitive (constructed) magic play MTGO, is vastly superior when it comes to that, offers all formats and actually even has the better interface. And you can cashout at any point.

    Arena is for casual fun and limited (where ofc you can also sink a lot of money into). If you only enjoy the game trashing F2P decks with your netdeck, then in my opinion are a very poor guy.
    Posted in: MTG Arena
  • 1

    posted a message on Guilds of Ravnica for Peasant Cubes (Common/Uncommons only)
    Quote from leadfeather89 »
    Quote from VariSami »
    ... something like a copied Hordeling Outburst would be living the dream.
    3RRR for a bunch of tokens hmm. That doesn't seem like a dream to me. Even my proposed 2RR for two Lightning Bolts to clear a board or 6 to the dome seems.... mediocre.
    Quote from VariSami »
    However, it still acts a type of Azure Mage in the absence of decent targets to copy and once you have the mana to spare.
    While not very common at all, I have drawn 2 cards in one turn during an opponent's endstep from Azure Mage, which wouldn't be allowed from League Guildmage.

    I'm not feelin' this card.


    uhm. a copied Outburst is RRR4 and a copied Bolt is RR1 which seems quite good.
    Posted in: Pauper & Peasant Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Hour of Devastation Spoiler Thread
    Wind is defintely outclassed by Spell Shrivel. Its really rare that +4 doesnt counter the stuff you want, unless its really lategame and then Winds wouldnt need extra support to become maybe better.

    Havent played Oasis Ritualist in the end, although i wanted to, I went with Ondu Giant and Wild Wanderer instead. The problem with Ritalist is, that it cant attack or block when you want to ramp with it, which kinda obsoletes the mana advantage it gives you.
    Posted in: Pauper & Peasant Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.