Yeah, I agree with you, I probably shold have claimed instead of the no-lynch. Easy to say now, of course. But I had to townies confirmed, and even though both where alive, I took my chances on living another night. I shouldn't have
Edit: It was still great fun though, and my first ever mafiagame. Hopefully Ill be playing some more soon.
Hmm, yes, you are of course right. The game I read didn't have a cop, so I guess comparing them are useless. Nolynch seems the way to go, for me too. What is the votecount?
Case 1: We've talked alot about this. To sum it up: You say 6 of the players in this game must be lynched if they we're ever to claim. I disagree. Other then than, I'll come back to the you against Zig thing tomorrow.
Case 2: Not a scum tell, but certanly the truth. On the vig thing, I agree with you. No vigging without a case or logical reason for it.
Case 3: It has been gone over. I still feel you could open up on your views a bit. Would certanly give a more town feel.
I never knew a player could possibly frown upon pointing out another player's scummyness.
I don't think I ever misrepresented Zig.
Well, my feeling is that you did. I had the feeling you took advantage of him doing bad defence of himself, and made him look more scummy than he actually was. This is my feeling.
"It's close to deadline, we had better lynch him, guys!"
That was my interpretation of it.
You interpreted it right. I think you are the most scummy person, and if it where up to me, we'd lynch you. Don't see what it has to do with bandwagons, though.
Scum number one, actually. I'll go for tinvision if we don't have the time to persue you, though.
So you are doing a 180. Mind doing a more extensive case then just 'he has annoyd me for the last 6 hours, he must be scum'? Give some elaboration on where you feel I've tried to lie? I've read the stuff you have answered to the points against you. I have not ignored them, the thing is I don't agree with them. I also made some points some posts ago, wich you have now answered to.
Ill give an example with the fact that you don't want to say, or didnt want to as you apparently have abandoned the theory, why you think the three players you mentioned where scum. You say saying you think they are scum is more or less the same as writing a top three scum list. This is more or less true. The thing is though, you have given few reasons why you think dagger is scum, and none to why you think wuffs is scum. Most people who post a scum list would probably have given some info on why they have certain people on a scumlist before making the list. And also, if someone made a list, and poeple asked them 'why', I don't think it's helpfull to simply deny to give any explenation, bacuse you feel it might benefit you. You ie. at one point say that if you are wrong about your assumptions, you don't wont trouble for them later. Not very helpful to the town.
Well, certanly would like some sort of case against me, and not just one based on posts made today.
Edit: It was still great fun though, and my first ever mafiagame. Hopefully Ill be playing some more soon.
Ah, of course..
Well, Im good.
No lynch would probably be a good idea, except wouldn't the mafia just not nk someone? I've seen it happen before, and then it's status quo.
I'm leaving for the army tomorrow, so probably wont have time to post until tuesday, I guess.
Now:
Case 1: We've talked alot about this. To sum it up: You say 6 of the players in this game must be lynched if they we're ever to claim. I disagree. Other then than, I'll come back to the you against Zig thing tomorrow.
Case 2: Not a scum tell, but certanly the truth. On the vig thing, I agree with you. No vigging without a case or logical reason for it.
Case 3: It has been gone over. I still feel you could open up on your views a bit. Would certanly give a more town feel.
You work on your case. Im going to bed.
Well, my feeling is that you did. I had the feeling you took advantage of him doing bad defence of himself, and made him look more scummy than he actually was. This is my feeling.
Yeah, I can see that.
You interpreted it right. I think you are the most scummy person, and if it where up to me, we'd lynch you. Don't see what it has to do with bandwagons, though.
So you are doing a 180. Mind doing a more extensive case then just 'he has annoyd me for the last 6 hours, he must be scum'? Give some elaboration on where you feel I've tried to lie? I've read the stuff you have answered to the points against you. I have not ignored them, the thing is I don't agree with them. I also made some points some posts ago, wich you have now answered to.
Ill give an example with the fact that you don't want to say, or didnt want to as you apparently have abandoned the theory, why you think the three players you mentioned where scum. You say saying you think they are scum is more or less the same as writing a top three scum list. This is more or less true. The thing is though, you have given few reasons why you think dagger is scum, and none to why you think wuffs is scum. Most people who post a scum list would probably have given some info on why they have certain people on a scumlist before making the list. And also, if someone made a list, and poeple asked them 'why', I don't think it's helpfull to simply deny to give any explenation, bacuse you feel it might benefit you. You ie. at one point say that if you are wrong about your assumptions, you don't wont trouble for them later. Not very helpful to the town.
Well, certanly would like some sort of case against me, and not just one based on posts made today.