2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on "Glistening Suns" - Red Rare Wrath via DoktorFroid
    I think I may try these instead of Anger in the board of Grixis Shadow. Interesting card.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on How to get into Modern?
    Mono-Red is always a good place to start. A few more options include:
    Mono White Soul Sisters
    Mono Green Stompy
    Bogles
    If I were you, I would go onto the Modern Forums, MtgGoldfish and ModernNexus, and learn about the decks that see play and their general strategy. From there, you can learn about decks that interest you, and even those that do not. That way, you will be brushed up on what to expect in the meta. Modern is a vast landscape, which can seem daunting, but it is also one of its biggest assets. You can find a home here, with 30+ decks that can win GPs with enough practice. Once you learn the ropes, and some general staples and strategy, anyone can find a love for this amazing format.
    Best of luck to you!
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on Grixis Death's Shadow
    Quote from Wraithpk »
    I think there are a couple main points that we aren't all in agreement on yet. I want to give my arguments for them, and maybe we can see if we can come to a consensus.

    The Tasigur/Angler split

    I played Grixis Delver before this, and I've always been a proponent of the 3/1 split in that deck, but I think in this deck the 2/2 split is correct. There were two reasons to play more Tasigurs in Delver: he's easier to play on turn 2 and sometimes you get to 4 mana and get to activate him when you don't have something else to use your mana for. In Shadow, I feel like it's much easier to cast Angler on turn 2 than it is in Delver because of the high number of fetches and Street Wraith. With the closing speed of the deck, I also feel like you don't have as much unused mana to dump into Tasigur activations. So basically, the upsides to playing Tasigur over Angler are lessened in this deck. The upsides for Angler are the extra point of power, which can be relevant against your average sized Goyfs, and that it's not legendary, which is the real sticking point here. You can't play multiple Tasigurs. While I think I would still rather have one Tasigur over an Angler, I would rather have one of each or two Anglers over two Tasigurs. So that's why I feel like the 2/2 split is correct here.

    The mana base and RR spells

    I think if you want to play Anger and Stone Rain over Kozilek's Return and Fulminator, you HAVE to play 2 Blood Crypts and 1 Steam Vents (in fact, this might just be correct for everyone). It's not hard to hit RR by turn 3, but you often don't want to. Black sources are the most important thing to have because so many of our spells require black mana. I've watched a lot of games where someone fetched a Steam Vents early and then lost the game because they had 3 black spells they wanted to play on a turn but could only play 2. Without RR spells in the deck, I would probably fetch Grave, Grave, Crypt every time if I could. Playing RR spells means you have to fetch Grave, Crypt, Crypt and limit yourself on blue mana, or Grave, Vents, Crypt and limit your black mana (which is probably even worse).

    For these reasons, I'm on Fulminator and Kozilek's Return(for now). Anger might still be the better card, but that RR by turn 3 is not free like people have been making it out to be in posts in this thread.

    Fourth color splashes

    I don't think this is correct to do in this deck. You can't search up your copy of Ranger of Eos like the GBx versions can with Traverse. Lingering Souls is a great card, but they play it because it gives them the ability to play a longer grindy game. We already have that ability with Snapcaster and Serum Visions fixing our topdecks. I just don't think the white splash really does anything for us.

    Temur Battle Rage, yes/no?

    I haven't been playing it, but I might try it as a 1-of in the main. The card is really good for helping you race when you need to win quickly. I think the ability to add a small comboish aspect to the deck might be worth the opportunity cost of a slot in the main.

    Planeswalkers

    I think LotV is not right for the deck. We just have too many instant speed things we want to do on our opponent's turn, so I think you'll have too many instances where you don't want to uptick your LotV for several turns because you have a good card in hand you don't want to pitch. I could maybe see 1 in the SB for a matchup like Bogles, but I don't know if I love that

    LtLH, on the other hand, seems great in this deck. I've been running 2 SB, but I've seen people running her MD. She's great in grindy matchups, and she's great in matchups where your opponent has a lot of X/1s. She very well may be MD-worthy, since even in matchups that aren't grindy or she's not killing creatures, she can provide fuel for delve and dig to threats.

    I'm wondering, has anyone tried Ashiok in this deck? It seems like a crazy mirror breaker.

    I think JVP is too slow for the deck. The only upside I can see is that people are probably going to side out their Bolts against you, so if they are using their Pushes and Paths on JVP instead of your actual threats then that's a win for you. I don't think he's worth it, though.

    Tibalt is clearly a 4-of in the main deck.

    Matchups

    I'm not really sure from my own experience, but I can say what I've read from various people. Grixis Shadow supposedly has a good matchup against GBx Shadow. I've also read that Shadow instead of Delver improves the Burn and Tron matchups. From my limited experience with Shadow, it feels like the control matchup would be hard, likely worse than it is for Delver. That's all I really know, though.


    I'm in agreement on the split of our Delve threats. 2/2 has worked wonders for me. I've never had a problem with Anger with the "standard" manabase (2 Grave, 2 Vents, 1 Crypt), because sometimes I find it worse to actually cast on Turn 3, instead preferring to wait until 4 or 5. I don't like the idea of a 4th color, personally, but that's me. I'm currently running 0 planeswalkers, mostly because I do not have access to them. If I did, I would perhaps run a one-of Last Hope in the 'board. I also agree that Tibalt must be a 4-of, every time. Always. #tibaltlyfe. My experience on matchups has been similar too what others have suggested, no need to rehash I suppose.
    Posted in: Midrange
  • posted a message on Harsh Mentor
    Quote from buwalda98 »
    As a Burn player in Modern, I'm not sure I'd play this. Maybe out of the board.

    I don't think anyone is suggesting this is a mainboard card. It's beautiful hate, through and through.


    Just figured I'd give my 2 cents. Ya, it is good hate. Kind destroys Elves and Affinity, which is hilarious.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Burn
    Quote from khaosknight69 »
    Seems like a great SB card but a bit too narrow for MB.


    I'm in agreement with this statement. Don't think it's good enough for main. Could be wrong, of course, who knows?
    Posted in: Modern Archives - Proven
  • posted a message on State of Modern Thread: bans, format health, metagame, and more! (3/13 update)
    I'm not yet sold on Harsh Mentor. Not sure if it's good enough even for the sideboard. It may be good in the board, but for sure not maindeck.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • posted a message on Harsh Mentor
    As a Burn player in Modern, I'm not sure I'd play this. Maybe out of the board.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Grixis Death's Shadow
    The core posted in the last pages is similar to what the Primer will have. Still working on it, should hopefully be ready soon. Still needing some insight into matchups.
    Posted in: Midrange
  • posted a message on Is there a format that you can simply play with the cards you have?
    Probably just casual, my friend.
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on Rhonas the Indomitable - CONFIRMED!
    Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeet. This guy is very solid. Going to throw a few into my mono green stompy brew for standard. Hope this is real.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on 4/11 Mothership Spoilers - UG Nissa and Zombies
    Zombie tribal is now pretty nuts in standard?
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Grixis Death's Shadow
    I'm not high on delver. I don't think he clocks enough, and he does not flip reliably enough for me. One of the reasons I dropped from grixis delver.
    Posted in: Midrange
  • posted a message on Doomed Dissenter
    Oh man, this would have been ridiculous in that GB Hapatra deck I'm brewing if it only costed B.

    Could you imagine dropping this turn one, Hapatra, Vizier of Poisons turn 2, then Exemplar of Strength turn 3? Surprise! I've got two 2/2s, a 4/4 and a 1/1 deathtouch on turn 3!

    Oh a man can dream.


    I dreamed for miscalculation once... (/cries)
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Grixis Death's Shadow
    Good points on bauble. Couldn't have said it better myself. Test it if you'd like, and let me know how it goes, but I don't think I'm going to try it. I'm going to ask again, does anyone have any insight into matchups? It would make creating the primer much easier.
    Posted in: Midrange
  • posted a message on Grixis Death's Shadow
    Relic has been good to me thus far. The control over when it is popped cannot be understated. Usually I can still play a delve threat on turn 2, then pop it. Truths I think is a must as well in the 75. Not sure about that bauble idea. You can try it, but I'm not sure if it fixes any issues in the deck currently.
    Posted in: Midrange
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.