- StumbleMuse
- Registered User
-
Member for 9 years, 2 months, and 3 days
Last active Fri, Sep, 27 2019 10:58:52
- 0 Followers
- 135 Total Posts
- 17 Thanks
-
Mar 12, 2018StumbleMuse posted a message on Dominaria Spoiler Digest - Who's Who and What's What from the Release Notes"Sylvan" is an adjective, and not a location. "Sylvan" means "of or related to the woods or wooded areas." So, the caryatid and the library were merely in wooded locations, and thus were "sylvan."Posted in: Articles
-
Nov 30, 2017StumbleMuse posted a message on If You Can't Take Criticism of Jeremy Hambly, You're Part of the ProblemInternet "trolls" basically have no life, and their mission is to get under your skin. If you are letting the trolls win, then you either need to re-evaluate your goals, re-evaluate the places you frequent on the Internet, or re-evaluate where and how you "display" yourself on the web.Posted in: Articles
I fail to see why this young lady is even important to the MtG community. It's not apparently because she plays Magic well, it's because she displays herself in skimpy costumes dressed like Chandra or Liliana... She wants a million followers on Instagram or something...
When you freely display yourself on the web, you're going to be subject to some ugly talk. I hate that for the young lady, but this isn't a MtG problem, this is an Internet/Real World problem. Does this girl play tournament level Magic? If she doesn't, then why do we care? I'm not attacking the young lady in my free time, but this hardly seems germane to the conversation on mtgsalvation.com. - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Fast forward 3 months, and now Goblin Lores are going for about 25 bucks a pop... Making me wonder, is Goblin Lore the most expensive "uncommon" currently being played in Modern? Seems like it's on the top end of that list for sure.
I like old-school explosive.
I like the Icy Manipulater in the new, slow Standard. It's really "cute" to see Thorn Elemental and Verdant Force making a comeback, although there are not many cards with a converted mana cost higher than 6 that I EVER play... The set looks pretty solid. It will be interesting to see what decks come to light, as people can literally start playtesting months in advance now, albeit with proxy cards... When Dominaria hits the ground/stores and goes legal, the metagame will be pre-developed, I bet, with people having discovered the best brews already... Could prove to be interesting... After most rotations, the "meta," especially in the shops, tends to be wide open and malleable for a week or few... I doubt that will be the case with the next rotation.
I would be hard pressed to keep a no-land hand, though I do see why you were tempted to try.
I love the deck; it has such power and resilience, and can be crazy explosive. I lost one match, a terrible matchup against a Lantern deck, when he stabilized early, got the Ensnaring Bridge out early, and had me "locked" soon thereafter. I scooped rather than have my soul ground out by the Lantern deck, but was pleased with good results after that.
Turn 1 Hollow Ones are powerful, but unreliable due to all the random discard. I had this great sequence last night. Turn 1 Adept, Turn 2, Faithless Looting, draw two, discard Bloodghast, discard Amalgam, cycle Street Wraith, play land, Landfall trigger Bloodghast, activate Amalgam (EoT), cast Hollow One, cast Burning Inquiry with my available red mana, we both draw three, discard 3 at random, attack for 7 with Flameblade, end of turn Amalgam into play. My opponent just shook his head. It was a great 2 turn set up. The deck is a lot of fun.
I do agree, that a full set of Street Wraith is mandatory.
I played the deck at my FNM last night; on several occasions, I had two Hollow Ones in play at the end of the first turn.
If you look at my Decks portion of my profile, you can see my list if your are interested. I've built this in the last week after seeing SaffronOlive's take on the deck and have been fascinated by it...
Sometimes, the deck is a smelly donkey that you want to drop-kick, but that's rare. I had a weird situation playing last night (due to Godly draw and even better luck with random discard) where I had THREE Hollow Ones on the board on the first term, and a bunch of correlating Bloodghasts and Amalgams by turn 2... Nuts, man... Absolute nuts.
That might even beat a "Vintage" deck on occasion.
The go-to cards have skyrocketed in price over the last two weeks. This deck will be a THING, I think... And I'm really glad to have pooled the necessary cards to build it.
It's Way Fun too...
Here was a general outline of my deck:
4 Vampire Nighthawk
4 Nantuko Shade
4 Gray Merchant of Asphodel
2 Geralf's Messenger
2 Tombstalker
3 Murder
3 Geth's Verdict
4 Victim of Night
3 Phyrexian Arena
3 Night's Whisper
3 Sign in Blood
19 Swamp
Since I was playing with cast off cards from other decks, I didn't put my Thoughtseizes, or my IoK's in the deck, or my Fatal Pushes, and then opted for the what seemed to be the less optimal "draw 2 cards, pay 2 life" cards. But I ultimately found that my Vampires did so much work for me that I had lots of life to spare, and that I actually liked those cards. But as others have pointed out, Thoughtseize and Inquisitions and Fatal Pushes are such solid cards that they should merit consideration.
I have changed my list from above, pulling the Messengers for Obliterators, as you have mentioned, and that raised the cost of the deck from like $42.00 to $130.00 or so, as I now have 3 Obliterators. I changed the Murders to Hero's Downfall, but most of the deck has stayed the same.
I love the Obliterators, personally. They gum up the battlefield, and basically prevent your opponents from attacking with anything ground-based. The difficult casting cost also proves wonderful with the Gray Merchant.
I've had the deck close to a year now, and it's one of my most reliable, most fun, and most successful decks... Highly recommended. Check out my Decks on this site if you want to see my exact current decklist, but it's not too far from above. For a "budget" deck, it packs a lot of punch.
I'm not quite grasping the card yet, but why would it even be limited to twice? If someone "Disperses to the Wind" my Lilianna, can I just recast her infinite times... Something seems to be lost in translation here... As long as she remains "in exile." Does recasting the card then pull that card out of exile? I'm not quite grasping everything here... This does seem like an interesting card, though... Just not sure I have had enough coffee to grok what is really going on with it.
Kind of tricky card; well-designed. I love it.