2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on Red Pact
    Quote from NavyJoe
    what about:

    Destructive Pact
    0
    Sorcery
    Destroy target land.
    At the beginning of your next upkeep pay 2R or you lose the game.
    You could feasibly destroy two lands on turn 2 via a turn 1 elves..... Not that land destruction is a a premium, but Vore would certainly enjoy this.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Grove of the Burnwillows + Kavu Predator
    Kavu Predator has a chance against decks whose only removal is dependant on toughness.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on Red Pact
    Anyway, regardless of the effect, it can't be something that can be put into any deck. The green one tutors for green creatures. and the White one prevents damage.

    The effects seem to be narrow so the initial freeness isn't overpowering.


    Just something to think about.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Red Pact
    Quote from harmless player
    That would be 1)too similar to the green one and 2) MUCH too abusable - think of playing the red and the green one first turn, power out a Darksteel Colossus... and lose 2nd turn... No, really, maybe you can play two Stifles in your next upkeep... also not really likely... But there's much potential. Impossible

    So it has to be a burn spell (Char, Incinerate, maybe only a Shock, but that's also not likely because it costs only one mana - the other ones have 3-4)
    or I could think of a Control Spell in red. That could be quite interesting for 0...
    IIRC, the Green pact can only tutor for Green creatures. Second, sneak attack requires a sacrifice, so the Collossus couldn't stay in play anyway.

    Thus, I would like to revise my brief wondering earlier to this:

    [Whatever] | 0
    Sorcery
    Put a red creature from your hand into play. It gains haste. At end of turn, sacrifice it.
    At the beginning of your next upkeep, pay RR2 or you lose the game.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on New Specter
    I don't know that they have to make a specter each set, but if this were likely, I'd supsect [Suspend 3--BB].
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Red Pact
    Quote from Lunan
    this one card is of the few we are still missing and the curiosity is killing me

    i feel it HAS to be a burn spell
    probably for at least 3 damage maybe 4 if its 4 i expect it to be a char for free then pay 3 latter

    so what do you guys think it might be?
    Maybe Sneak Attack?
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on [FS] Magus of the Moon, Magus of the Moat (rumored)
    Heh....

    Magus of the Moon | 1U
    Creature---Wizard
    If a player taps a nonbasic land for mana, it produces colorless mana instead of any other type.
    1/2

    Of course it's not an enchantment and it's not going to happen...
    Posted in: Rumor Mill Archive
  • posted a message on New Border Observation
    So when will they retract the picture so they can make a card with lots of rules text?
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on [FS] Podcast: Zoetic Cavern, Ghostfire, and some artwork
    Nifty, although it would be better as 2 damage for R1 since that's all that's needed to get rid of the problematic white creatures.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Screens of MTGO 3 symbols not finished?
    My guess is they won't be implemented unless we have a set that introduces Tribals or Planeswalkers rather than portent them.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on "Quicken" Metacycle?
    Quote from Cloud_821
    Other than costing one and drawing a card, there's no big connection...
    Does there have to be?
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on "Quicken" Metacycle?
    Quote from Orim"s Thunder
    Swiftbond | G
    Instant
    Draw a card.
    Put a land from your hand into play tapped.
    Just for reference
    Quote from Orzhovminion
    That swiftbond would be hot but I dont think they would make it a cantrip.
    Why not? It does the same thing as Llanowar Elves or Elvish Pioneer, except the 1/1 body is replaced by some card. Aggro would probably want the body in many cases.
    Quote from EgoTripper
    If it were going to be a metacycle, they'd have to make it consistent.

    "put into play tapped" --> I like this one, but it sort of violates the 'spirit' of making things faster on which the other two are based.

    "if haven't played a land" --> This is an important subtlety; the other ones don't let you violate a resource curve in any way. While it might be expected that the LAND one would, I think people are right in saying that to do this would be very abusable. The alternative is to make the green one crappy... which I think is fine. This is a metacycle about fast-casting, so it's not unreasonable that green would have the worst (it's not known for its instant-speed effects, yeah?).

    Swiftbond, G (love the name, btw!)
    Instant
    If you haven't played a land card since your last upkeep, put a land card from your hand into play.
    Draw a card.
    Wonderous. However, playing a land on your opponent's turn rather than your own has no special value. Regardless of a cycle, I see no reason why the card I proposed could exist.

    One of the things that can be considered as far as templating is concerned is that Quicken allows the player to play a spell they just drew, which is why I put the draw first.


    If nothing else, I would still be fine with this:

    Swiftbond | G
    Sorcery
    You may play an additional land this turn.
    Draw a card.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on Vanilla Keyword
    I'd rather my creatures have Strawberry.


    Vanilla is not a good name for a keyword.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on "Quicken" Metacycle?
    I could definately get behind a

    Swiftbond | G
    Instant
    Draw a card.
    Put a land from your hand into play tapped.

    Thus it makes a land into a sort of Llanowar elves.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • posted a message on [FS] Scout's Warning & Cryptic Annelid (Rumored)
    Quote from Hydrokinesis
    Cryptic Annelid
    3U
    Creature - Beast
    Nooooooo! I want Annelid to be a creature type aligned with black. Further, I want sentient Leeches.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.