@PMDirac I don't like being restricted to naming non-artifacts, the mana cost and the possible card draw are also detractors. The 3 mana thing might be good though, I did lose 1 game to a person who Ad Nauseam'd on turn 4 on the draw when I would have cast memoricide the following turn. I don't think it is worth it though since theis only 46.7% likely to happen on turn 3, unless you ghost quarter yourself, then it is slightly over 53%.
Maindeck DoJ over the 2nd wrath is interesting, but I think there are enough elves players in my city that it is really close. Plus the 2nd wrath isn't as much as a liability as the 3rd/4th, and I sorta have that coverage with the Settle. As it stands of the active modern players I think there are on average 1-2 more elves players I will see in a given week than Humans players (I usually hit about 4 stores each with about 20 players per event). Actually just thought of an idea, since most of the elves are on the north side of the city, I can just swap accordingly depending on the store I am in. Thanks!
- Registered User
Member for 3 years, 3 months, and 8 days
Last active Wed, Feb, 21 2018 00:48:04
- 0 Followers
- 469 Total Posts
- 45 Thanks
Jan 23, 2018Also my most up to date list is this now:Posted in: Developing Competitive (Modern)
Changes from my last list are as follows:
-1 Tectonic Edge
+1 Field of Ruin
Field of ruin is nearly strictly better than tectonic edge, as the have they same effective cost to activate
-1 Wrath of God
+1 Day of Judgement
-2 Surgical Extraction
-1 Stony Silence
+1 Cranial Extraction
-1 Blood Baron of Vizkopa
+1 Profane Procession
In the sideboard primarily I wanted to have more game against combo, I took a look at Steffen's list and decided that I liked the slaughter games tech and went with the black versions. I did a 2/1 split because they are effectively identical in function and it plays around name a card type effects that might exist in some edge case. Speaking of name a card situations, the sweeper swap was specifically for meddling mage.
The final change is more experiemental, but performed decently this past weekend, which is testing out profane procession over the 2nd bloodbaron. Blood baron excels in the midrange black or white deck matchups, and theoretically profane is good there too. The upside to profane is that it is better against other strategies, like eldrazi tron. I killed 2 Thought-knot seers and then traded it for a ratchet bomb against the e-Tron regular at one of my LGS and that felt great. If he hadn't spent the ratchet bomb on it the value would have been insane. I also managed to exile an Emrakul that someone Through the breached into play.
It ultimately might be too cute, but I'm testing it out for a few weeks to get more data
Jan 23, 2018@ThorlokicacPosted in: Developing Competitive (Modern)
Field of ruin replaces itself on its own, where as ghost quarter works against emeria unless you draw your other card that could also otherwise be a plains. Field of ruin arguable has synergy with Emeria, while ghost quarter has none, and actually makes it harder to get emeria online.
Jan 23, 2018If you are on the draw with field of ruin, and they have turn 3 tron, they do get 1 turn of 7 mana, which is definitely a downside. Being on the draw with ghost quarter, you do get to knock them down to only having access to 3 mana on turn 3, but unless you have a wayfarer you are going to be very far behind. You will be down to 1 land to their 3 on the end of their 3rd turn. Even if you have crucible you won't be able to get it in play and useful until they are at 5/9/11 mana. Since ghost quarter is only good with wayfarer on the draw, and wayfarer can tutor for GQ on the draw, there really isn't a good reason to play more than 1. I definitely agree 1 ghost quarter is good to have in the toolbox, but it is a huge step down in power level from FoR.Posted in: Developing Competitive (Modern)
Jan 22, 2018@soccerfanxlPosted in: Developing Competitive (Modern)
Field of ruin costs 2 mana to use, ghost quarter costs 1.
If you have 2 plains and a utility land in play you have 3 mana.
If you have 2 plains and a ghost quarter in play and you ghost quarter one of their lands you have 2 mana left.
If you have 2 plains and a field of ruin in play and you field of ruin one of their lands you have 1 mana left.
Jan 22, 2018@madudu2Posted in: Developing Competitive (Modern)
Hey, forgive me for being direct here, I think it is really awesome that you are brewing a fun deck with Martyr of sands in it, you definitely don't have a martyr proc deck there so I'm not sure that this is the best place to talk about it. Your deck, while lacking in win conditions, isn't really a control deck and features no late game presence. I have a big long critique of your deck I can PM you though if you want it
Best of luck!
Jan 21, 2018Posted in: Developing Competitive (Modern)Quote from blackhawk23x »@Demanic
I like having 4 Ghost Quarter because my typical line against Tron is too spend my first few turns tutoring ghost quarter and destroying Tron lands. 2 Mana is so much in the early game where killing Tron matters the most. With crucible of worlds and wayfarer you can recover the land disadvantage or by just pathing your own guys.
FoR gives you an untapped land, it only costs 1 more mana than Ghost Quarter which you make up for the next turn by having +1 land. Crucible of worlds only lets you stay at the same number of lands you had with GQ, it lets you be positive with FoR.
I also think that flagstones loses its place in martyr with the advent of FoR because you don't need it to convert your lands into plains.
Jan 16, 2018Went 4-0 at modern monday with the list I posted on the last page beating Grixis Midrange 2-0 (looked like Death Shadow, didn't actually see Death's shadow), Burn 2-1, Mono Blue Living End 1-0-1, and then Burn 2-0.Posted in: Developing Competitive (Modern)
Most noteworthy thing is that I mulled to 5 on the play vs burn in both game 1s on purpose because I knew they were on burn and I wanted to make sure my hand wasn't too slow.
Round 2 was a guy who was new to town so he had not played against me before. He played normally and beat me on turn 4, when all I really needed to do was untap with ranger. The finals were against a guy that I beat regularly so he knew what I was up to and I think that did him a disservice. I had kept a 1 lander and scryed a martyr to the top. He assumed I was sandbagging a land to make him tap out so I could slam a martyr and gain life, so he didn't really cast much while I was stuck on 1 land. Eventually I landed the martyr, blocked with it and sac'd but he had the skullcrack. Unfortunately for him I had orzhov charm and was able to martyr the following turn undoing all of his work. I think I would have lost that game had he not been playing around martyr so much in the first few turns, which is kind of funny.
I'm pretty sure I'm playing something similar to this list this weekend at the SCG Dallas, probably only change would be to go up to 3 or 4 field of ruin
Jan 12, 2018To start, I don't think Proc needs a combo finish, but a few counterpoints:Posted in: Developing Competitive (Modern)
1) It doesn't really cost 2 mana though, it is more like 7+ mana over the course of multiple turns.
2) The loot is an exile, which has disynergy with recursion. You would need to exile some number of important spells if you want to flip it at all. In the Mono White version specifically, due to the curve you have to exile a proc or it will never flip, meaning you have to draw 2 of your 3 procs if you want to use the mana from it to forecast.
3) Gateway requires a cast, 5 turns, 5 cards with 5 different CMCs, 7 mana, and then another card to take advantage of the success condition. You can't possibly flip it before turn 8, meaning you also more or less require a martyr and an activation just like the guildmage. Guildmage costs less mana, has fewer requirements, and actually wins the game. A 2 mana white 2/2 is about as useful as exile-looting for 1 mana every turn. But I feel like it is important to point out I think guild mage is not playable right now, I mentioned it because it is better in that it takes less set up and actually wins the game when it works out.
4) Nahiri can loot away emrakul, and has dramatically higher upside than gateway because it can exile artifacts, enchantments, creatures, and so on.
Aside from that the cards you are looting away are your spells, meaning it is going to trend towards reducing the number of white cards in your hand making martyrs worse.
I just feel like the card is asking for a lot, and the payoff doesn't actually win you the game, like an emrakul or drain would.
Jan 11, 2018Oh! That makes more sense, thanks.Posted in: Developing Competitive (Modern)
I feel like if you are trying to combo kill Vizkopa Guildmage plus Martyr of Sands is easier to assemble, and Nahiri, the harbinger is going to be more consistent and isn't a dead card when you aren't comboing. Really I think Nahiri is the best option if you are looking to combo kill
Jan 10, 2018Hey!Posted in: Developing Competitive (Modern)
I like field of ruin way more than ghost quarter, and I am probably going to bump it up to 3 of them, but I was running the 2/1/1 split because wayfarer can tutor for a specific one if you need it. I wanted to be able to search up a ghost quarter to keep my opponent off tron on turn 2, which did come up last night at my tuesday night modern event. I'd say the tectonic edge will get the axe first since it has the lowest upside now that field of ruin does the same thing for the same amount of mana.
Settle the wreckage is excellent. I like having it as a 1-of because there are a lot of matchups where you don't want to tap out for a wrath (manlands etc) and being 1 sided is nice too. It also will cause people to play around it after you cast the first one, so you get a bit of mind game value there too.
I have 5 sweepers total, so the fact that only 3 are maindeck hasn't been a problem.
I told BoBoCTiberius yesterday that the only way any of the 4 orzhov charms are getting removed from my 75 is if someone kills me and physically takes them out of my deck. The card does so much heavy lifting it can't be understated. It really allows you to get out of way too many situations.
As far as what I'm playing against I'll just run through what I've faced this week, I've done three 4 round events and have a combined record of 10-1-1
Wr Kiki-Taxes 2-1
Grixis Control 2-0
BR Death's shadow 2-0
RG Shamans 2-0
Counters Company 1-2
Boggles 1-1 (Game 1 I won on turn 38, game 2 I lost in extra turns)
WB Eldrazi&Taxes 2-0
Gb Tron 2-1
I don't remember my matches last week, but I think I went 3-1, 3-0-1, 2-1-1, and 2-2 in 4 events.
I'm still deciding what deck I'm going to play at the SCGO in Dallas this month so that is why I've been going to a lot of the local events. I'm either on this, or Elves (9 lords no combo)
Jan 9, 2018Took a break from elves after my dog ate the sideboard and then kept on playing proc after I got the sideboard replaced because I was loaning elves to my girlfriend. I've been consistently going 3-1 or 4-0 with it twice a week and got 9th at a pptq with it a few months ago. This is where I'm at:Posted in: Developing Competitive (Modern)
Sep 16, 2016Jund has lightning bolt, so I would prefer to not do the other 17 myself. Besides that they have quite a bit of early drops that pressure us, combined with discard spells to reduce the amount of life gained off martyr. Historically I've done fine against BGx decks and this essentially is just adding a fragile combo as a means of fighting against a deck that is very good against fragile combos (the combo is Runed halo naming one of our own cards, or martyr and enough white spells to maybe not immediately die, not drawing blightsteel, having nahiri if you do). I don't even want to think about relying on runed halo against a deck with maindeck abrupt decays. Surprise, Abrupt decay is now a 2 mana instant speed 17 damage burn spell.Posted in: Developing Competitive (Modern)
Lets now assume you always don't die from casting it. Blightsteel now has to dodge liliana for a few turns. You also have to worry about attacking then dying to the crackback.
Not sure what you mean by "combo", but melira coco doesn't really care about this, storm doesn't really care about this (they can just short storm you after you get it into play), Grishoalbrand is way faster than this and it opens up new lines of victory for them, combo elves is way faster than this (but incidentally basically never wins through finite damage so maybe it is good there), Ad nauseam is weak to this for sure 100% agree with you there.
I'm super medium about a turn 4 blightsteel against tron. That means you haven't ghost quartered them and they have access to a more consistent stream of "blightsteel type" cards. Sure, they have only karn to deal with it, but the further past turn 4 you get with this, the more likely it is that they have karn.
Sep 15, 2016Emperion is terrible in proc, it stops you from gaining life. My point was that other decks (like say for example RG through the breach) can just slam an emperion on turn 3, which is significantly better than hitting a blightsteel on turn 4 that deals 17 damage to you.Posted in: Developing Competitive (Modern)
The number of decks where I would willingly pay 17 life to potentially kill them in the following 1-2 turns are exactly: Infect, Ad Nauseam
That is only if I could guarantee the it would deal me 17 damage, and not more (because it will kill you 10-40% of the time depending on fetches, shocks, number of martyrs drawn, number of white cards in hand)
My point is entirely that this isn't the deck for the spell.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.