Someone said Partners?!
- Registered User
Member for 3 years, 7 months, and 10 days
Last active Sun, Jun, 17 2018 09:35:14
- 0 Followers
- 211 Total Posts
- 24 Thanks
Apr 6, 2018Yesterday night, Italy, 10 players.Posted in: 1 vs 1 Duel Commander (French)
2 Dragonlord Ojutai
1 Queen Marchesa
1 Azami, Lady of Scrolls
1 Nissa Eldrazi
1 Sidisi Brood Tyrant
1 Arahbo, Roar of the World
1 Saskia the Unyielding
1 Teferi, Temporal Archmage
1 Jori En, Ruin Diver
Apr 1, 2018Hi guys! This is my last version of Queen Marchesa:Posted in: 1 vs 1 Duel Commander (French)
What do you think about the list?
My most important doubts are about Fiery Confluence and Rolling Earthquake. When Dominaria will be out, those cards will not hit Planeswalker anymore (with the new rule) and if Earthquake is easy replaceable with Radiant Flames, Fiery Confluence will worth the slot anyway?
Beyond this i would ask your impressions about some cards:
Dark Petition = is really needed ? It's a little clumsy and the 3 black mana is not good to cast all of our cards.
Path to Exile = is still a good option? I think, since the meta is full of partners and fast creature decks, is a suicide card.
Elspeth, Sun's Champion = i'm not her fun but my question is: the deck can really handle another big drop?
Castigate = it seems a little slow to me. 2 mana to discard one is not that good, no ?
Elspeth, Knight-Errant = really worth the slot?
Other random cards: Lingering Souls, Ghostly Prison, Angrath, the Flame-Chained, Innocent Blood, Kaya, Ghost Assassin.
P.S. = Teferi's Protection is awesome. Alone and in combo with Balance.
Mar 23, 2018Hi guys, i wanna report the little tournament of tonight in Italy, 10 people.Posted in: 1 vs 1 Duel Commander (French)
1 jori en
1 queen marchesa (mine)
1 dragonlord ojutai
1 nissa eldrazi
1 zurgo bellstriker
1. Queen Marchesa
Mar 11, 2018blinketto182 posted a message on [[Duel Commander]] Duel Commander Primer (Introduction, Ban List, Rules, & More) [12-01-2017 Update]http://mtgtop8.com/event?e=18706&f=EDHPosted in: 1 vs 1 Duel Commander (French)
Another top8 without Partners!
Mar 9, 2018blinketto182 posted a message on [[Duel Commander]] Duel Commander Primer (Introduction, Ban List, Rules, & More) [12-01-2017 Update]With partners around absolutely.Posted in: 1 vs 1 Duel Commander (French)
Mar 3, 2018blinketto182 posted a message on [[Duel Commander]] Duel Commander Primer (Introduction, Ban List, Rules, & More) [12-01-2017 Update]What i saw are the last 5 majour tournaments, from 17/12/17 to 25/02/18 and the results are:Posted in: 1 vs 1 Duel Commander (French)
Times in top 8:
the rest are situational.
In 5 tournaments, partners won 3 times and zurgo 1 time.
Mar 1, 2018Posted in: 1 vs 1 Duel Commander (French)Quote from Crazy Pierre »I agree with blinketto182.
You have one of each removal spell, they have two commanders. You kill one of them, the other one is fresh, you kill that one, the other comes out.
It is unsustainable to keep up with them, so either share the general tax or ban Thrassios or just remove the mechanic, which is meant for a game with 3 other people and so on. And on top you get 4 colors. It's a bit much. With these commanders, all the small things add up quickly.
You know what is funny? One person from Committee said to me that partners are so strong and always in top8 cause players are bad and play bad decks
Every top8 of the last year is a big sequence of : partners-zurgo-titania and some situational deck. Funny.
Feb 27, 2018I'm happy cause the meta atm is stable and there aren't card that need ban.Posted in: 1 vs 1 Duel Commander (French)
But PARTNERS guys. PARTNERS.
They start with 1 more card than the other deck + all the resources they got from their colours. Is not acceptable, cmon.
They make an incredible pressure keep playing generals.
Is not that difficult : the general tax should be shared between the legendary creatures with partners mechanic.
P.S.= try to mulligan vs partners with only one general and share the % of win
Sep 27, 2017Posted in: 1 vs 1 Duel Commander (French)Quote from Crazy Pierre »
Why Cataclysm? It's a card that becomes much better only if you have Planeswalkers behind it, and is extremely dependent on your board state as well. If you take this away, Aggro has...Armageddon and Ravages of War (if you can get it) and neither of those replicate Cat's advanatge. Balance is actually pretty fine at the moment, there aren't any fast mana rocks to ramp into it for a blowout.
Fastbond I can see being banned again, but there just isn't enough Titania/Gitrog going on around here, at least, to make it a no-brainer.
Ancestral Vision why? You can kill them well before it resolves.
Cataclysm makes sacrifice also Planeswalkers. Armageddon and Ravages of War require a perfect situation to be good, it's really hard.
Fastbond has no sense. Titania is tier 1 since was printed and Gitrog in this meta is really good; with fastbond those decks has the opportunity to win since the first 3 turns. Cannot be possible.
Ancestral Vision in the end is fine. Since Fireblast is gone i don't know why we have still Force of will legal.
Sep 26, 2017Posted in: 1 vs 1 Duel Commander (French)
agree with you i would have ban, in add of the cards they banned:
Sep 25, 2017https://www.facebook.com/notes/mtg-duel-commander/september-2017-rules-banlist-update/1983982491852648/Posted in: 1 vs 1 Duel Commander (French)
Edgar Markov is now banned as as commander only.
Fireblast , Eidolon of the Great Revel , Sulfuric Vortex , Price of Progress are now banned.
But.. where is Fastbond ?!
I can't really think that they have not understand yet the overpower of Fastbond.
Yesterday against Titania the match was this:
1st oppo turn: land+fastbond
1st my turn: land
2nd oppo turn: pay 1 life and put on the battlefield a forest and a fetch, cast Ramunap Excavator, re-play 3 times the fetch from the gy and play Courser of Kruphix from the hand. Courser makes 0 the damage from fetch and fastbond -> 5 forest, Titania and keep play infinite times the fetch to create elementals.
Also Balance can't face this cause Titania creates elementals in that way.
You guys wanna play in a format that accepts match like this?! It's ridicolous.
I always trusted the committee but this time, keeping Fastbond legal, they are wrong.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.