I had to clarify with Seps about my restriction after votes were reset post-SO.
And I ebwodp-d my vote in, which was fine, since I didn't lose any power.
Only if by "edit by way of double post" you mean "vote in your 5th post, nearly 24 hours after SO's daykill."
And Iso, you didn't shoot an investigation at Ganderin/Tezz, you nerfed him. You know he's town because you're scum. And odds are, that bit where you claimed to target Wrath is total fabrication. You still have your ability-kill shot for today. That's why you didn't use all caps on your attempts.
I have NO problem with either an Anak, Wrath or Iso lynch today.
Because I was bored and the game was stagnating. I've pointed out that Anak's claim is false. I've pointed out Wrath's claim is false. And everyone seems hung up on why I did something that doesn't make any sense to them.
I know Pinky is very new around here, but from what I've seen, she has a supernaturally good gut, so I'm totally barning her on this. Arcadic has been way over-aggressive, and in my humble opinion, she hit the nail on the head, and he's definitely worth pursuing.
You spent a lot of the day jousting with Iso, but not really attacking him.
You never research the stuff you say, and you make these big, definitive statements, and expect everyone to just accept them with... what evidence?
Certainly nothing you're ever prepared to dig up to back up your claims. You just expect everyone to take what you say at face value, even when you're blatantly wrong. A lot of people just let you slide since you're a pretty new player, but it's a bad habit, and it's annoying as hell, and it's not something that you should be able to get away with.
As you can no doubt tell, it drives me right up the wall.
If you want to make statements like that, and have people actually take you seriously, you have to back them up. Yes, I know that means you have to actually research the things you say, before you say them, but I for one will not let sloppy play like that slide.
TL;DR: Start backing up your sweeping generalizations with fact, or expect further scorn.
Since Arcadic flipped town, and I wasn't going to touch Iso with a 10-meter pole. It was a choice between Wrath and Archonoid, as they avoided the Arcadic wagon.
Because even though I haven't actually claimed, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out. Iso has demonstrated that he's a bigger threat to me and the town than Anak. I would LIKE to see him lynched today, but everyone seems to be just milling around. Role limitation or not, you're not moving your vote and GD hasn't posted in days.
So I unvoted to see where the chips fall. It worked. It's verified you as the third scum in my book. (Iso, Anak and Wrath)
So Vote Anaklusmos. Assuming I live tonight, I'll likely get immediately nerfed tomorrow. Since GD's not around or been replaced yet, I have to hope Eco hammers before Iso unvotes his buddy.
Now since I've just painted a big target on my forehead, you'll excuse me if I don't come out and actually SAY it, especially while Iso's still around.
Oh, and WoD and Tilde, did you get any message from Seppel since his last post here? If not, that confirms that my ability is once per Day.
No, I've not received anything from Seppel, which is giving you a little bit of credibility. Not much mind you. But, Anak is obviously lying about his role. Either that or there's contradictory "impossibilities" in this game.... or Seppel's just being a b-mod.
Only if by "edit by way of double post" you mean "vote in your 5th post, nearly 24 hours after SO's daykill."
And Iso, you didn't shoot an investigation at Ganderin/Tezz, you nerfed him. You know he's town because you're scum. And odds are, that bit where you claimed to target Wrath is total fabrication. You still have your ability-kill shot for today. That's why you didn't use all caps on your attempts.
I have NO problem with either an Anak, Wrath or Iso lynch today.
Because I was bored and the game was stagnating. I've pointed out that Anak's claim is false. I've pointed out Wrath's claim is false. And everyone seems hung up on why I did something that doesn't make any sense to them.
You stuck your first post vote on him. That's all you did. You said yourself that it wasn't based on any of your reads, but a barn of Pinky.
You spent a lot of the day jousting with Iso, but not really attacking him.
Cheerfully supported a SomeOne lynch.
More verbal sparring with Iso, without really saying much...
Then SO gets daykilled in post #491.. and now that I'm reviewing it again... I see posts 513, 514, 516, 535 and 536.
WHICH DIRECTLY CONFLICTS WITH YOUR CLAIM!
I'm lynching you because unless GD/GD's replacement appears Iso CAN'T be lynched. THERE'S NOT ENOUGH VOTES.
Because even though I haven't actually claimed, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out. Iso has demonstrated that he's a bigger threat to me and the town than Anak. I would LIKE to see him lynched today, but everyone seems to be just milling around. Role limitation or not, you're not moving your vote and GD hasn't posted in days.
So I unvoted to see where the chips fall. It worked. It's verified you as the third scum in my book. (Iso, Anak and Wrath)
So Vote Anaklusmos. Assuming I live tonight, I'll likely get immediately nerfed tomorrow. Since GD's not around or been replaced yet, I have to hope Eco hammers before Iso unvotes his buddy.
Iso was BEGGING to be targeted Night 1. Of course I wouldn't touch something so obviously toxic.
And right now Iso and Anak are equally scummy in my book.
This statement is false.
This statement is true.
Now since I've just painted a big target on my forehead, you'll excuse me if I don't come out and actually SAY it, especially while Iso's still around.
Unvote
No, I've not received anything from Seppel, which is giving you a little bit of credibility. Not much mind you. But, Anak is obviously lying about his role. Either that or there's contradictory "impossibilities" in this game.... or Seppel's just being a b-mod.
Really? I thought it was the fact you're already voting for him...
Seppel? Can we get a prod on Ganderin?
Um... No. I think we'll lynch you instead.
If I operate on the premise that you're town and Wrath is scum, with Anak as a scum buddy....
Third scum would be... Cyouni? He's been distancing himself from all the arguments...
Flurgen... that makes too much sense. Especially with Wrath not being his cronic lurky self...
I swear I will punch you through the internet if you're wrong about this Iso.
Unvote. Vote Anaklusmos. That's 4 of 5 to lynch. Nobody does anything until we hear the claim.