MTG Salvation

Quote from Highroller »

Nope.

I had the feeling you'd mess this one up.

See, CropCircles absolutely did say that on post 1026:



But you voted for him earlier on post 967 with no explanation:



So I'll ask you again: why did you vote for CC?

And I'll ask everyone else: why shouldn't we vote Vaimes?

Okay, that's my bad. I left my vote on him because of what looked like a scumclaim.

I voted him because I didn't have a townread on him and was fine running him up. That's pretty much it.

He's lurking, weird roleclaim I still don't fully understand the purpose of, his wagon was 95% villagers, fits on basically all teams ever.

Highroller I dunno, I just said that I agree with him that the arguments for him being scum [within the past couple of pages] don't make sense to me. Let me read him again and get back to you, probably tomorrow.

[I know we're running out of time shh.]

Sloth's a tease and he knows it.

Oh please, my vitality could eat your vitality for breakfast.

Okay well I guess that's that.

And after thinking on it a bit, I guess it would be bad if both town doublevoters started with one vitality, because as soon as scum kill one they basically have a free kill extra with the other.

Like I said, scum could be banking on a double kill toNight, so if Tubba isn't the vit pinger then they're probably fine bussing. I don't know how much stock to put into that world.

I never trust Sloth.

I kind of think Highroller is a villager? Or, at the very least, I agree the logic of him being scum doesn't really hold up.

And if we miskill him Wisp will rag on me forEVER.

I think if we [villagers] can all afford to potentially lose one vitality, then we can just safely kill Tubba and get on with it.

If we lose because Tubba is town and gave up then I guess we'll have completed the circle vOv

The real concern is if Sloth is a villager, he's the weakest link, which means he really should be making an attempt to find the mafia vitality thief.

This is probably dumb and DVC is yelling at us.

Quote from Killjoy »

And if we lose in lylo if town votes wrong, why do you want me to vote before hammer?

The only way we lose is if you vote a villager and all three mafia are online waiting to hammer.

Given that from your town!POV, half of the other players are mafia, it shouldn't be hard to vote two of them. In theory.

Quote from Highroller »

Wait, why?

Also, which question is the second post in reference to?

Because if any town votes any other town, and refuses to move that vote, we're ****ed. It's LyLo. So if you're voting me and refusing to budge, then either you're mafia, in which case I should vote you, or you're town, in which case it doesn't even matter.

Again, maybe you're mafia, but I'd rather you live today.

Uhhh because he said "go scum!"?

The second post is an extension of why I didn't have a strong scumread/push yesterDay.

Honestly, KJ, I'm all for you voting and then unvoting once Grape posts a votecount. If we lose because the entire scumteam is camped out on Discord waiting to ping each other to swoop in with a triple hammer, then oh well.

And Sloth can make all the noise he wants about my "pre-determined" or whatever it was comment, it was very obvious that gameflow was moving against Anak and he was going to be voted out unless there was a strong push elsewhere. And no one had a strong push. I certainly didn't.

I thought CC was outed mafia, I forgot I had unvoted Tubba and when Tammy "hammered" him I had no idea we were still short, and it's not that I didn't have a scumread, I just had zero confidence and didn't want to push a misyeet. My "strongest" scumread was bessie because I thought she was trueclaiming as mafia Watcher, but all of the other mafia have played very carefully because I haven't had any luck divining her buddies. Sloth has questionable bessie mentions, Boom defended her a lot based on meta.