Quote from Gutterstorm »Quote from Arwin_Rand »As much as I respect your position and authority as a storyline guru and lore keeper I disagree with you whole heartedly about seeing Narset/Sarkhan as a "hook up." From what I understand, Elspeth's feelings for Daxos were pretty clearly stated but it seemed like Narset and Sarkhan were just friends and personally really hope it stays that way.
Yeah, while I didn't get to read Godsend I'm pretty sure that Elspeth knew Daxos from a long time ago and her feelings for him developed long before the events of the Theros Block. As for Narset and Sarkhan I don't see any difference between they're "random hookup" and a romantic relationship between Chandra and Gideon. Narset made Sarkhan feel peaceful in his otherwise ravaged mind. Chandra makes Gideon question his alliances and his beliefs. I think either of these relationships is fine but I don't think calling one a random hookup while thinking the other is fine is a good way to look at it. Personally I think Sarkhan deserves a nice lady to accompany him after all the crap he's been through. And if Chandra can get Gideon to lighten(heh) up a little then great. I do think it would be interesting if they explored planeswalkers relationships with each other more which it seems is what they will be doing in the future. I mean we know that Jace and Lilli were a thing once upon a time.
And see that bolded idea is precisely why I think that Sarkhan and Narset should NOT be a couple. I have a real problem with this idea in fiction that the significant other is a prize or reward for the main character having gone through something difficult. It's especially prominent with male leads and female love interests but with any character it reduces them to the status of "prize to be won." Heck, as much as I like Narset's little duel with Zurgo it still bothered me a bit because even though they planned on bringing her back through time travel shenanigans, killing Narset to motivate Sarkhan, even if they're only friends (as I believe they are intended to be) smacked of the Women in Refrigerators trope for me.
1
I'm wondering if there is any overarching narrative for this set, and what role Dack plays in it, or if this is just a world presented to us a la Homelands.
1
A lot of people I've hurt don't give a flying durn about my intent, or whether I am repentant or not. In their eyes, what I did was evil.
We can call specific actions evil without judging the character of the person committing the act. We can also do the same with intentions, and possibly make a general statement based on a character's personality type.
to call Liliana evil because she has done evil deeds would be the same as calling Toshi Umezawa and even Urza evil. Both of these characters are highly revered in MTG canon, but they've both committed some pretty heinious acts in their respective stories...and they were the GOOD guys.
1
This.
Torment and Nemesis are by fat MTG's darkest books. You also can't go wrong with Shadowmoor. Eventide wasn't as dark and scary as it could have /should have been, as it was basically all of the legendary creatures of Lorwyn reuniting for one big showdown with Oona. no horror there.
But then, you have the darkest, most terrifying MTG book of all.....LEGIONS! Cringe in horror as Akroma is turned into some wierd griffin thing. Cower in terror as Braids is portrayed completely against her established character! Feel the fear as Kamahl whines and does absolutely nothing until the end of the book! allow the morbid curiosity of watching Phage bump uglies with the First to overtake you! All that, and you get the mortifying, hide-under-the-sheets-worthy, EPIC...dice games...to boot! huzzah!
1
Also in there: the socks you were going to wear today but chose not to because of Bolas' mind control. It's all part of the master plan...