To be fair in your original post you made it seem like me and dels were pretty even. If you are town, I would ask that you perhaps lead with the whole "this isn't a joke vote, I am voting this person for defending someone and shutting down discussion, while the other fellow I mentioned has been better" instead of waiting. It is kind of burying the lead, I think.
See now the person who comes in and talks fondly about random votes and then votes based on the lack of random votes when there has been quite a bit of conversation? That I'll vote.
I don't think anything is outright suspicious at the moment. I won't wait around forever to vote, but I'll at least give people the night to filter in before I start to charge in.
Interesting. You seem to be an attacking type of a guy. I can respect that. I believe that defending people I think seem townish is just as important as going after people I think are scummy. I am not unwilling to vote, I just haven't yet. As for buddying dels... I don't think that happened.
If I am wrong, then I am lying and am scum, and you should probably vote for me. For you see the situation I spoke of is my reasoning. You claim it is untrue. Generally speaking the only people who manufacture reasoning are scum, so if you think that then you should be very suspicious of me, which would be a bad assessment of the situation like I said. I can't really be wrong unless I am scum.
Hm. My first reaction is no. From my own experiences scum don't decide to turn joke votes into real votes too often. It is more something I'd suspect a town member to do when they get an honest read on a player and decide to pursue it.
I don't know what RVS stands for, but I am going to guess it amounts to "joke phase" that most games suffer from.
I am all for effort, but you have to be clear with your intent I feel. I took it upon myself to answer your question to Dels myself about why not vote Plum. Your effort is not in question, but I have an obligation to see if you are scum yourself, and not challenging your supposed earnest effort wouldn't be very smart of me.
You are a very aggressive person. Do you think I, as scum, will use whatever tactic required to not weigh in on the current situation? I have seen all sorts of situations where people say things about themselves. It can break both ways. Scum can do it to hide mistakes and set the tone for how they are viewed, or town can just be giving honest information about themselves without really thinking how this would be viewed by the more suspicious minded out there.
Hello. My name is Chris. My favorite color is orange, my favorite animal is the lion, and I enjoy reading, writing, and having fun with my friends.
I think the pace of the game should be determined by the players as it goes naturally, forced deadlines of "one week" ahead of time don't always go to plan. I'd say play it by ear.
Vote Wildfire393
I am all for effort, but you have to be clear with your intent I feel. I took it upon myself to answer your question to Dels myself about why not vote Plum. Your effort is not in question, but I have an obligation to see if you are scum yourself, and not challenging your supposed earnest effort wouldn't be very smart of me.
I think the pace of the game should be determined by the players as it goes naturally, forced deadlines of "one week" ahead of time don't always go to plan. I'd say play it by ear.