2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on [AFR] Scion of Stygia— Eilidh Lonie preview
    Honestly, flash is quite close to not untapping alone, so I think this is very solid for draft.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [AFR] Spiked Pit Trap— B. D. Walters preview
    Using a D20 for only 2 options feels like a total waste. It's the exactly rate of a mundane coin flip. I get it's not functionally equivalent in this set but c'mon.

    That is not actually true, if you are using a fair dice. There are 9 numbers from 1 to 9 and 11 between 10 and 20. So it is 11/20 for the good outcome while only 9/20 for the bad part
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [AFR] Triumphant Adventurer— TitanSmashMTG preview
    Quote from leslak »
    [quote from="AnImAr_ »" url="/forums/magic-fundamentals/the-rumor-mill/822727-afr-triumphant-adventurer-titansmashmtg-preview?comment=2"]Finally a good enabler besides Fly. This is also just killing The Tarrasque left and right in limited.


    Just when you thought the typical 1/1 with deathtouch was annoying...notice how the first strike only happens during your turn, so no, it won't be killing Tarrasques anytime soon unless the opponent is at 1 life, still, this will be really good in Limited as a dungeon enabler or as the go-to guy to grab Equipments.
    </blockquote>

    The attack trigger on Tarrasques is not optional, so they cant attack you with Tarrasques if you got no other creatures than this but you can attack them...
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [AFR] Good Morning Magic 06/29— Dawnbringer Cleric and You Hear Something on Watch
    This to me confirms that abillity words are flavor in this set
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [AFR] Owlbear— Ouest France preview
    I would guess they are just using these ability words for flavor in this set. I think it is silly that it does not have the abillity of keen sense though, if they want to call it that.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on The nerfed cards on Mirror Mirror on arena
    Quote from Guesswork »
    The companion nerf and the Phyrexian creature type update both change the functionality of printed cards. You can split hairs and say it's not, but I disagree.

    You make it sound like it is new. The grand creature type update in 2007 changed the type of 1167 creatures and there have been many other changes before and since. There were also other functional changes (apart from creature types) over the years, e.g. Oboro Envoy is quite nasty as printed but is a lot worse with its update. Heck, Orcish Oriflamme had one between Alpha and Beta! That said, I do agree that the companion fix was very much a big functional change which does suggest that they are more ok with it.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on The nerfed cards on Mirror Mirror on arena
    Teferi actually got a HIGHER loyalty as well. 4 -> 5

    Some of them are very bad now. Fields is still solid though I think. Teferi is quite a bit worse: Against agro, you can't bounce 2 drop on the play (since 3 drop will then kill him). Against control, they can at least counter him now.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Oracle update and Rules changes most particularly The Phyrexian errata wave
    Quote from Mystic_X »
    Wait a minute...
    Are non-creature cards not getting this errata as well?

    Arguably, Phyrexian arena should also definitely/inherently have the subtype Phyrexian now!

    It would need tribal as well - subtypes are not shared between types (currently - not counting tribal, which just allows all creature types), so yu cant just add it as an enchantment type. I do not think WoTC has ever added tribal on a nonteibal card, even if it has a very strong flavor with just one type (e.g. there are quite a few cards that are associated with elves, but no elf type).


    Consecrated Sphinx is wellknown enough that it can be the unique phyrexian water marked card without the phyrexian type.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [MH2] Face to Face games -- Sea Drake Reprint
    Quote from Ryperior74 »
    source:https://magic.facetofacegames.com/exclusive-modern-horizons-2-spoiler-sea-drake/



    Alright I want to Confirm that this Reprint is no Laughing matter this was infact a Legacy staple at it's time. So let see if this could potential do the same thing in modern.

    The goal AFAIK was to get it out with 1 land and 2 moxes, to negate the drawback. It seems tricky to do so in modern and that is not taking into account that it is just not that far above the curve no more
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [MH2] Batterbone, Strike it Rich, Fast // Furious, and Goblin Engineer— Dhalucard previews
    Funny, the german card version of fast and furious has the names exchanged on the two sides.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [MH2] Mothership 5/28— Damn, Bone Shredder, Flame Blitz, and Gorilla Shaman
    I dont understand completely from a color pie, design and phylosofical perspective why the hell the overload must be payed with white mana.
    Overload mean one-side mass destruction. But "destroy all creatures you don't control" as always has been a monoblack effect (see Overwhelming Forces, In Garruk's Wake Plague Wind, Dread Cacodemon, Rain of Daggers etc.). That makes sense since black is a selfish color that wants to win at any cost

    On the other hand, every single one white mass removal has always been symmetrical because it is in the color phylosophy the concept of balance, justice, order and equal retribution to everyone.

    Somebody please explain me why this card can't be monoblack and I am forced to use a color that would do as a result, the exact opposite of what said color should do normally.

    I think you missunderstand the card a bit. Notice, it can target your own creatures too (meaning overload is not one sided in this case) and Overload is an alternate cost (i.e. instead) - it is not an additional cost.

    Thus, for 2ww you get wrath of god (already a good card on its own) and for bb you get a single target removal spell. This card is quite obscene!
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [MH2] "Disapprove"— UMotivo preview
    Quote from Lectrys »
    If you cast this in the middle of the Protean Hulk Footsteps of the Goryo combo, assuming you cannot stack saccing this below them saccing Hulk if you cast it before their end step, they can shrug their shoulders and tutor for 2 sac outlets and Priest of Fell Rites, then go off again next turn through one kill spell if they have 5 lands.

    Why would you cast it in the middle? They play footsteps, you respond with this.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [MH2] Tourach, Dread Cantor and two Familiars— Bigweb previews
    Funny, you kick Tourach and he sings to himself
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [MH2] Mothership 5/25— Garth One-Eye and Deep Forest Hermit
    Quote from Ryperior74 »
    Could this be the first ever bannable 5-color legendary creature.

    would Rules committee even allow a creature that can make a black lotus when flicker cards exist to make more (which is how I would build him by the way) and we were just screaming at the top of are lungs in anger at wizards about Jeweled Lotus

    I assume you are talking an EDH perspective and not modern - I seriously doubt a 5 drop that must use a tap abillity without haste matters at all there.

    It is a cute abillity, but it is not banable (at least from a power perspective). Like, compare him to Jegantha, the Wellspring. The latter gives 5 mana every turn with some restrictions on the mana. This gives you 3 mana (that admittedly can be saved) and requires you to jump through hoops to get more. I would say that it is similar in level to Jegantha, but Jegantha sees relatively little play, so I can't see this getting banned for the Black Lotus abillity. Naturally, the other options might be better or just as good, but still, they are not too unfair.

    I think it is fair to draw a parallel to Captain Sisay. She is also a toolbox commander, but she can go off on her own, cost less and her toolbox have better cards. She is missing colors though, but still.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Banisher Priest Vs. Fiend Hunter
    Quote from Naethyn »
    A friend has a casual (non edh) deck with Banishing Light, Oblivion Ring, Banisher Priest and Fiend Hunter with the goal of creating a million cats using Ajani's Chosen. Three of the "exile until leaves play" cards creates an infinite etb loop. With constellation being a thing who knows.

    Two of those four cards does not work for that combo. Banishing Light And Banisher Priest can only target oppeonts stuff.
    Posted in: Commander (EDH)
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.