Anyone ever try to picture the void, you CAN'T by definition. It is so crazy, yet silent and attributeless. I couldn't worry then so I am not afraid of it now, but that afterlife...is scary...where are Furor's angels?:) I really don't want to go to any sort of hell.
Hopefully, there is no sort of hell, or suffering there is at least proportionate to the definite integral of your deeds from years 8 to X, where X is your dying age.;)
I'm not particularly worried about death. It's just a change of address. The anxiety that surrounds it for me is born rather of the circumstances leading up to the event.
Easy for you to say...you've got angels waiting for you!:wink:
If I ever bump into the several people at my school who were sexually abused by an older gay pupil, I'll be sure to tell them they weren't hurt by it and that any distaste they may have for gays as a result is irrational. I imagine they'll be glad to hear it.
I said with other people. Not the person in question. That statement does not apply in any way.
Are you telling me that you have never noticed the propensity for cynical teenaged atheists to make the God/Santa Claus comparison? Why do you think they do this? Is it just a coincidence?
And I quote my Positive Aethist freind Mike(And he is actually really smart too, just not when he said this):
Death itself(the transition) does not scare me. But the suffering I might experience does, like drowning, suffocating, injury(aren't we all afaid of severe pain/suffering?). Also, if there is no afterlife, then I have no senses, pain, or feeling of time, so nothing to worry about(I couldn't even worry). If there is an afterlife it can be happy, bad, infinitely happy, infinite hell(Picture every type of suffering you can have at once, man, that makes me go crazy).
There are so many long, cited, and informative Wikipedia articles, it bothers me that people totally dismiss it. And Segienthaler could have corrected the error himself but instead chose to wait and make a huge stink about it--well, know we all now who he is now :).
I would love to make it hader to make or edit articles, but so many dogmatic people would rather just have a total wiki, all they care about is "anyone can edit" and not credibility.
I understand I think we all habe our angel fantasies and expressing yourself is good even if you are expressing yourself sexually
But trust me you won't want to know my angel fantasie8^)
Hey I got an idea I'll go make the angel fantasie thread.:tongue3:
Leave all that angelic tosh alone!:eek: Ahhhhhhhhh....!!! I hear they don't like sex toys at all.:wink2:
Quote from DesolationAngel »
Also many wemon can orgasam over and over when I have to take a nap afterward.
It was not part of my argument(against anal sex yet for homosexuality, if you still don't understand)
Biologically, anal sex is markedly worse than its counterpart. This is not to say that any homo. sex is worse that any hetero, there is really no difference. Two men kissing is not biolicially different than a man and a women kissing.
My idea about switching genders is just my preference, If you disagree, I can totally respect that. So I propably should not have even mentioned that there...at it does look confusing. I just have to share my MTG angel fantasties I guess...;)
Quote from Grobyc »
You actually won't enjoy anal sex as much since you no longer have the prostate (which is what makes it enjoyable for most).
I wasn't saying that I would do that...I specifically said otherwise, if that is what you are getting at.
Hopefully, there is no sort of hell, or suffering there is at least proportionate to the definite integral of your deeds from years 8 to X, where X is your dying age.;)
We all know that this comparison is often made, it is just too common to not know.
Easy for you to say...you've got angels waiting for you!:wink:
...all I have is the void of unkown........
ahhh...lightning angel, so cute...:redface:
I said with other people. Not the person in question. That statement does not apply in any way.
And I quote my Positive Aethist freind Mike(And he is actually really smart too, just not when he said this):
"Its just like Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy".
Enough said.
See this article.
I would love to make it hader to make or edit articles, but so many dogmatic people would rather just have a total wiki, all they care about is "anyone can edit" and not credibility.
I agree. It gives no good moral grounding. And it is just parents lying through their teeth, real good example to set for children.
Yeh, you didn't need two posts for those comments, you are just infating the count...but wait, so am I...noooooooooooooooooo!!!:tongue3:
Anyway, why do you feel weird?
Leave all that angelic tosh alone!:eek: Ahhhhhhhhh....!!! I hear they don't like sex toys at all.:wink2:
Lightning Angel 3/4
Flying, Haste, Vigilance--Indefinite orgasms.
By the way, I own a full play-set of these!
...Alright...enough of this...
I have never heard such a positive review. I am talking about the one by Penadragon Studios.
But I will pick A Scary Movie 2, if I remember correctly. Geesh..what horrid trash.
It was not part of my argument(against anal sex yet for homosexuality, if you still don't understand)
Biologically, anal sex is markedly worse than its counterpart. This is not to say that any homo. sex is worse that any hetero, there is really no difference. Two men kissing is not biolicially different than a man and a women kissing.
My idea about switching genders is just my preference, If you disagree, I can totally respect that. So I propably should not have even mentioned that there...at it does look confusing. I just have to share my MTG angel fantasties I guess...;)
I wasn't saying that I would do that...I specifically said otherwise, if that is what you are getting at.