These were so much better when this was a forum post with insight and discussion. Discussing two cards per set is hardly enough. Why not spend more time on at least the latest one or two? Plus, this article format is clearly not encouraging conversation, versus the forum threads had pages of responses.
The layout here is absolutely terrible. The bordered tables with default fonts look like they're from 1998 and are unreadable at a glance. Why cram the most pertinent information onto the side of each group? Putting it above or below the table would allow for more horizontal space, which would move the data closer to the column headings and make at least that better. But the information hierarchy here is non-existent.
And why not spell out what each column is describing? "Change since last week" and "Change since launch" would be a huge improvement.
- Bristol
- Registered User
-
Member for 18 years, 9 months, and 5 days
Last active Wed, Sep, 27 2017 02:33:25
- 3 Followers
- 4,893 Total Posts
- 28 Thanks
-
Aug 25, 2015Bristol posted a message on The Running Tally of Current Sets for August 24, 2015Posted in: Articles
-
Feb 3, 2014Bristol posted a message on Launch Giveaway!My favorite card: Horde of Notions. Five-color Elemental tribal EDH for the win!Posted in: Announcements
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
The guys behind these cards claim to be paying commissions. However, there have been many complaints that they're just outright stealing the art.
You can post in this thread, create your own website or take it to Ebay. I wouldn't recommend the latter as it's saturated with awful work, resulting in low prices. However, keep any advertising or mention of what you figure out limited to your sig or PM.
To be fair, while his alter does apear to be a copy of yours, "winterizing" the background of a card isn't exactly an original idea.
(This obviously referencing the original Counterspell & Jace Beleren.
http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=155432
So while it's perhaps debatable, I don't see anything against the rules here. Personally, I find it tasteless and vulgar in its heinous distortion of anatomy, but that's neither here nor there.
Also, Treacherous Urge.
He's asking about an indestructible creature. But that discussion should really be in a different thread anyway.