These were so much better when this was a forum post with insight and discussion. Discussing two cards per set is hardly enough. Why not spend more time on at least the latest one or two? Plus, this article format is clearly not encouraging conversation, versus the forum threads had pages of responses.
The layout here is absolutely terrible. The bordered tables with default fonts look like they're from 1998 and are unreadable at a glance. Why cram the most pertinent information onto the side of each group? Putting it above or below the table would allow for more horizontal space, which would move the data closer to the column headings and make at least that better. But the information hierarchy here is non-existent.
And why not spell out what each column is describing? "Change since last week" and "Change since launch" would be a huge improvement.
- Bristol
- Registered User
-
Member for 18 years, 8 months, and 30 days
Last active Wed, Sep, 27 2017 02:33:25
- 3 Followers
- 4,893 Total Posts
- 28 Thanks
-
Aug 25, 2015Bristol posted a message on The Running Tally of Current Sets for August 24, 2015Posted in: Articles
-
Feb 3, 2014Bristol posted a message on Launch Giveaway!My favorite card: Horde of Notions. Five-color Elemental tribal EDH for the win!Posted in: Announcements
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Good catch. The cycle of Halimar Depths-like lands is an exciting prospect.
Hear, hear. There was nothing condescending about that post.
To be fair, it was uninformed. A lawyer is offering legal assistance to a person and you assumed that the lawyer was unaware that he and said person are in different countries. Plus, your comment only said that the laws differ from country to country which implies that that's the information you think he didn't know.
Amazing. You don't think he would know that?
But I would agree, Polish. Look into some professional advice on this and ignore 90% of what you see here. Though I do think you should drum up support.
What happened to that kid, by the way?
The point is to not bring it up again. That's why I preceded my statement with the bit about society having double standards. If you want to debate the standards and policies of this website you can do it in the Community Issues section and not in the Altered Art thread.
Yeah, society has some weird double standards but let's not debate this again. Standards here are based on creating a safe environment for users of all ages but also from all moral & religious backgrounds across the world.
You realize you're talking to a guy that teaches art, right?
I think your intentions are in the right place, but if you really want to position your self as a serious critic (a person who critiques), you're going to have to offer ideas that are more complex and articulate than "the wings of the dragons look... off" & "your lines could be better."