2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on Inquisition of Kozilek
    Quote from Foam-Dome »
    Quote from Tackman »
    The reprint that no one expected!


    I see what ya did there!

    So the reprinted cards don't take place on Paliano, right? Because otherwise, Inquisition of Kozilek makes no sense in this set.

    I think its probably a leftover from when they planned to put it into bfz. Needed a place to dump it and conspiracy needs some money cards to sell packs and encourage drafts.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Mothership Spoilers 7/4 - Liliana and her Oath
    Quote from Xcric »
    i think she's overrated and will see major play everywhere for a month, then tank in value hard as she doesn't find a home, and then rise a little bit just before she rotates, then tank again harder.

    i also think i'll be criticized heavily for saying that.



    nice art though, and i dig her emblem

    I think most people will quickly figure out just how weak this lili is. The fact that the -2 requires you to 1. play creatures. 2. have creatures in the yard. 3. want a THREE MANA RAISE DEAD means that her applications are few and far between, with number 3 being the main hurdle. The ult is too hard to attain, the +1 isn't impactful enough, and the -2 is one of the worst loyalty abilities to ever appear on a walker. Expect this to see 0 play.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Incendiary Flow (Magic: the Amateuring)
    Quote from ktkenshinx »
    Quote from prismatic elf »
    Quote from Valanarch »
    I guess that it is still decent removal. I don't get why they think that Lightning Strike is too powerful though.
    Me either but it is a 2cmc burn spell that can target a player.
    Quote from Valanarch »
    I guess that it is still decent removal. I don't get why they think that Lightning Strike is too powerful though.

    I don't remember the source offhand, but a recent Stoddard (I think it was Stoddard) said that the cards aren't necessarily too powerful for the format. They just restrict color identity and player color choice. If you have Strike in the format, people tend not to play red decks; they just play decks splashing red for Strike. I believe this was Wizards' rationale about this card and others like it.


    Seriously? What decks have ever "splashed" for lightning strike? Do they honestly believe that the card is THAT good?
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Official MTG Facebook (APAC) Preview - Providence
    This card is FAR from a good sideboard card in control decks. The deal with leyline type cards is that you MUST pack 4 of them because in most decks they are dead cards if drawn past turn 1. This card is in the same boat, but unlike leyline of the void or leyline of sanctity, this card doesn't instantly win you the game. It more likely than not contributes to you losing the game, considering you could have put an actual useful sideboard card in this slot. In standard it is 100% unplayable.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Summary Dismissal
    Cool spell, just has very limited constructed application. Undoubtedly cool in multiplayer though.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Official MTG Facebook (APAC) Preview - Providence
    Quote from Gutterstorm »
    Wat.

    @_@


    See

    Quote from Tackman »
    The throwback to Archangel's Light we were all waiting for.


    Card is exceedingly bad. There are much better sideboard cards against burn, which is the only use this card really has.

    Though the name and format make me hopeful we have a cycle, perhaps a series of "chancellor" spells
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on MTGGoldfish Preview - Scourge Wolf
    It's a 2/2 first strike for RR. Activating delirium in RDW is probably just going to be straight impossible. If this card would be in a RDW list, then that means red is probably a tier 3 deck. This thing should be an uncommon, its just bland and bad.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Current Modern Banlist Discussion (1/18/2016 update - Summer Bloom/Splinter Twin Banned)
    I think that with the nature of this deck, breaking the format more than any format has been broken since combo winter, easily merits two bans. This argument over temple or eye is pointless. If wizards doesn't think 1 ban will push the deck into complete in-viability, the will ban both lands in order to be sure.
    Posted in: Modern Archives
  • posted a message on Let's talk about ingest/processor cards.
    Quote from Lacosa83 »
    Salvage Drone
    Mist Intruder
    Ruination Guide
    Sludge Crawler
    Transgress the Mind
    the enabler...as single cards i don't like it, but could be a aggrotempo deck (like the first version of the faeries).

    Not one of those is remotely playable in standard alone, and the processor would be marginally playable IF they didn't have the processor drawback. This is a HARD mechanic to enable, you have to connect with one of those abysmal cards and then your pay off is an effect that wouldn't warrant a drawback if it was printed last set. I mean the blue processor is quoted as part of Christmas-land scenarios and in those scenarios it is just a worse mist raven. It actually blows my mind just how bad this mechanic is.
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • posted a message on Chinese preview card
    Given that more cards are designed with Limited in mind that any other format, yes. Is this new? Because from my experience this has been happening since 1997.

    Again, the issue is that this card is ABYSMAL in limited. You need 4 or more colors to make this card something other than a really over-costed tumble magnet. Getting 4+ colors in limited is really hard and EVEN IF you manage to get a deck that can reliably pay WUBRG for this garbage it is still extremely medicore, it's paying 5 mana to not affect the board in a meaningful way. Most of the time when you play this card with 5 colors it will just be an outpost siege with 5 uses and no versatility. But lets be honest here, you will not draft a 5 color deck in limited that can reliably win games and this will be relegated to last pick every draft.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Chinese preview card
    Every time I look at this card I can't wrap my head around how bad it is. I don't understand how wizards thought this was acceptable in any way. A card that is absolutely 110% garbage last pick in limited and just as bad in constructed and EDH is made a rare inexplicably.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Speculated New Dual Lands & Gideon
    Quote from Borosini »
    It's just a mockup from the guy remembering what he saw. I guarantee you that the card will do exactly what it says on the card.


    "Top of page 4 guy" is not OP, OblivionedOne. Unless the latter would like to weigh in?

    EDIT: In reply to Swords.

    Looks like I got tricked. The card is much less confirmed though I would not be remotely surprised to see it in the set.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Speculated New Dual Lands & Gideon
    Quote from Borosini »
    Quote from swords36 »
    Quote from Borosini »
    Quote from zachawry »
    Again, if the card's name is actually "Ugin's Council," that's a QA fail the likes of which we haven't seen since "patheitc" on M13 Wit's End. The word for advice is "counsel." The rules text isn't implausible though.


    But "council" is also a word that makes perfect sense in this context. (The name of a chapter in LotR is "Elrond's Council.")

    Ugin is holding a council. Maybe at this council, the PW's take each other's counsel.... Smile That being said, no opinion on whether or not this is fake.

    (My kids are right; English is hard!)


    I disagree. Nothing in the art or flavor text implies that others besides Ugin and Jace are present. A council is a group of individuals and a meeting of a council requires a quorum thereof—I'd suggest at least three. However, there is plenty to suggest Jace is receiving guidance from Ugin—that is, "counsel." Secondly, I'd argue that "Ugin's Council" would be an appropriate name for a creature card, but is not appropriate for a sorcery, the names of which tend to be verbs, abstract concepts, or inanimate objects.

    I'm splitting hairs, obviously. But my intuition screams that this card is fake, or at least has a typo in the mock-up.

    Mate every other card this guy leaked has just been confirmed verbatim. I'd say ugin's counsel or council is also 99% confirmed.

    I'm referring to top of page 4. Note how the dual land has the wrong name.

    It's just a mockup from the guy remembering what he saw. I guarantee you that the card will do exactly what it says on the card.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Speculated New Dual Lands & Gideon
    Quote from Borosini »
    Quote from zachawry »
    Again, if the card's name is actually "Ugin's Council," that's a QA fail the likes of which we haven't seen since "patheitc" on M13 Wit's End. The word for advice is "counsel." The rules text isn't implausible though.


    But "council" is also a word that makes perfect sense in this context. (The name of a chapter in LotR is "Elrond's Council.")

    Ugin is holding a council. Maybe at this council, the PW's take each other's counsel.... Smile That being said, no opinion on whether or not this is fake.

    (My kids are right; English is hard!)


    I disagree. Nothing in the art or flavor text implies that others besides Ugin and Jace are present. A council is a group of individuals and a meeting of a council requires a quorum thereof—I'd suggest at least three. However, there is plenty to suggest Jace is receiving guidance from Ugin—that is, "counsel." Secondly, I'd argue that "Ugin's Council" would be an appropriate name for a creature card, but is not appropriate for a sorcery, the names of which tend to be verbs, abstract concepts, or inanimate objects.

    I'm splitting hairs, obviously. But my intuition screams that this card is fake, or at least has a typo in the mock-up.

    Mate every other card this guy leaked has just been confirmed verbatim. I'd say ugin's counsel or council is also 99% confirmed.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Speculated New Dual Lands & Gideon
    Quote from swords36 »
    Quote from cfusionpm »
    Until an official spoiler is released, in no way should this thread be titled "New dual lands and gideon." Should be "speculated lands and gideon."

    Real or not, the mockups are mockups and not official spoilers or official cards. This thread should be in Speculation.


    The last time I checked this forum was called rumor mill, not "redundant card list". Stuff like this deserves some credence as the "leaker" has already made one correct prediction and the cards make sense.


    Well 2/3rds correct prediction. he said 5-6 mana RG omnath. RG and Omnath were correct. mana cost wasn't. I'm not saying these can't be real, but I think the people who are being skeptical have every right to do so and to be frank we all should take these with a grain of salt. OP could be right, OP could be wrong, but saying definitively one way or the other is just dumb at this point

    I'm not saying believe everything this guy says, I'm saying we shouldn't dismiss him out of hand like the guy I replied to would like to.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.