Wow we can just blog about our political ideologies and pretend it has something to do with MTG.
I love how you use the term "AltRight" as your view that they are destructive. What about the "Alt Left"? I somehow believe because you more identify with their views, you don't view them as destructive or harsh or political trolls.
This isn't about harassment. Just like "Crackgate" wasn't about harassment.
Twitter, youtube, Facebook etc... Should not be should not be treated as a place where a person can be free from all differing opinions and criticism whether soft or harsh. If you want to use those platforms as a way to put yourself out there then you should be held to the same standard as if it was on the radio or TV.
On that note i think perhaps the Guy probably would have been severely fined by the FCC for certain words, but i doubt he would have lost his broadcasting license. If Howard Stern can stay on the air, i know this guy could.
- natesroom
- Registered User
-
Member for 10 years, 7 months, and 8 days
Last active Thu, Mar, 23 2023 00:00:32
- 0 Followers
- 527 Total Posts
- 54 Thanks
-
Dec 1, 2017natesroom posted a message on If You Can't Take Criticism of Jeremy Hambly, You're Part of the ProblemPosted in: Articles
-
Feb 3, 2014natesroom posted a message on Launch Giveaway!My favorite card is a hard one to say... I am going to have to go with Garruk, Caller of Beasts. I have so much fun with him.Posted in: Announcements
I think Kiora, The crashing wave is going to be my next favorite. - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Demanding that a judge answer a question is rude and inappropriate. If you doubt an answer or desire more support for an answer, ask for a rules quotation instead of asking for a judge level that is both irrelevant and unverifiable. -Carsten
Can he assign 2 damage to one and 2 too the other? Could i block with 4 creatures and he could assign 1 point to 4 different creatures?
If a creature has protection from a certain color, does that mean spells of that color that don't target them but affect all creatures can affect them?
I was thinking it was a 4/2 then a 2/0... got it!
I thought that you couldn't regenerate a creature if it was given a -x/-x that brings its toughness to 0?
In the archives the question is:
the answer was:
I didnt understand this.. could someone help me understand why this works?
If i fuse It by casting both sides and target one to go to their hand and then they sacrifice a creature do they have to sacrifice the god?
Or After the second spell my opponent says "Ok, well you can keep doing that but he's indestructable" Would that qualify?
Or does that just qualify as the most n00b play ever?
So in the case of a GOD if i make it -x/-x enough to make it zero, then the opponent bounces one of his creatures to his hand, would my spell then be targeting an illegal target?