EDIT: Actually, allow me to amend that. The biggest risk to pucatrade is that the owner(s) can give themselves any points at all, because if they exchange them for cards then that represents more loss when the system inevitably closes, period. That is the big payoff of the pyramid scheme, is that they can exchange a non-existent entity that will eventually lose all value and which they can generate in infinite quantity, which can then be traded to others for physical value. It is very easy to obscure that, and I'm sure it does happen. The question then becomes how long it's worth risking the use of the system before it shuts down and the value vanishes.
- AzureShadow
- Registered User
-
Member for 10 years, 5 months, and 12 days
Last active Sat, May, 15 2021 14:54:51
- 0 Followers
- 2,357 Total Posts
- 158 Thanks
-
Oct 3, 2015AzureShadow posted a message on The Magic Street Journal: Wizards Always Hurts The Ones They LoveJust because it's pyramid scheme doesn't mean it's bad, per say. It provides a service that nowhere else does, just like one could argue that Bitcoin does, albeit an illegal one in that case. It does, though, absolutely fit the textbook definition of what a pyramid scheme is. The initial referers or payees have the highest amount of value in the system, and that collectively decreases as it spreads to the bottom.Posted in: Articles
The biggest risk to pucatrade is that the owner can give himself an account with, say, a few million points and buy up a huge pile of cards, then shut the entire thing down. I don't think that's particularly likely, but it is possible.
EDIT: Actually, allow me to amend that. The biggest risk to pucatrade is that the owner(s) can give themselves any points at all, because if they exchange them for cards then that represents more loss when the system inevitably closes, period. That is the big payoff of the pyramid scheme, is that they can exchange a non-existent entity that will eventually lose all value and which they can generate in infinite quantity, which can then be traded to others for physical value. It is very easy to obscure that, and I'm sure it does happen. The question then becomes how long it's worth risking the use of the system before it shuts down and the value vanishes. -
Jul 31, 2011AzureShadow posted a message on All is Fair in Love and MarketingHuh. Well that's certainly a different opinion on the whole deal than what I've seen before.Posted in: Mockingbird Blog
I'm inclined to agree with you, for the most part. Sexualization of pretty much anything happens in fantasy environments, so it's come to be expected by me and a few of my friends, who just shrug it off and ignore how silly it is.
An interesting read, for sure. - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
There has never been a Planeswalker reprint in a non-core set. I really doubt it's going to happen, since the character has had their story advanced significantly.
If anything, we'll see her reprinted in the next Modern Masters or possibly even a Commander/Planechase/Conspiracy etc type set.
Not that I disagree that there should be way more playable cards and reprints in these. If we don't see Vindicate at the very minimum I'll be disappointed, since this is literally the perfect opportunity to reprint it. Not that that's saying much since they passed over Damnation in FtV:A...
It's unlikely they'll give us new duals though, because that inflates the value by a lot.
He definitely flies under the radar for the most part too. Small effects like him are way stronger than they appear at first glance in this format, and will often go ignored.
Mostly bad in EDH for plenty of reasons. Personally I prefer Carrion Feeder both for the permanency and the mana cost, and even then only in BWx decks.
I don't think you understand how stax works very well.