2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on How to determine if a trigger is missed
    So the answer is "there is no way to do it"?
    My question is about a trigger that has no choices, has no visual effects on resolve or on going into stack etc if this is not obvious
    Posted in: Magic Rulings
  • posted a message on How to determine if a trigger is missed
    How do I determine if a trigger is missed by my opponent without reminding him?
    Lets say he has a creature that has "When this attacks alone, it gets indestructible until end of turn"
    Creature attacks alone and I want to block or not depending on whether it has indestructible or not
    Posted in: Magic Rulings
  • posted a message on [Deck] Modern Slivers
    only playable in builds with fetches AND mana slivers
    still hard to cast, but effect is powerful to make room for a pair in sideboards
    Posted in: Deck Creation (Modern)
  • posted a message on Stompy
    Pelt Collector, Dryad Militant and Hexdrinker are non humans but I doubt Wildborn Preserver is a good choice. Flash and Reach are mostly irrelevant. He is a manasink, ok, but bad t2 play if you have t3, t4 plays for all your mana. Compared to Avatar Of The Resolute, Barkhide Troll, Strangleroot Geist, Scavenging Ooze he is only this powerful as Ooze and the latter is already more of a meta call, btw Ooze is a manasink and grows too and has a nice ability.
    Posted in: Aggro & Tempo
  • posted a message on [Deck] Modern Slivers
    Chalice build is meta dependant, with Phoenix gone from top positions it is weaker for sure
    Chalice is good against Death Shadow, Infect. Semi good vs Whirza, Affinity, Storm, Ad Nauseam. I cant say its even semi good vs Burn, its playable, but Burn is fast and supposedly already played its threats before you want to counter them with Chalice. Now it even hedges its Bolts with another 3 cmc spell.
    In my opinion Chalice is more of a sideboard card now. In many matchups it doesnt do much and without much interaction we just need to be fast, meaning more 1 drops which are not going well with Chalice.
    Posted in: Deck Creation (Modern)
  • posted a message on [Deck] Modern Slivers
    Interesting list
    I think its better with 21 lands to make t2 Chalice more reliable
    Necrotic is kinda weak at 20 lands with no mana slivers
    First Dregscale should be good, 4th - weak
    Horizon lands I think are not that great, we have a lot of mana sinks

    Posted in: Deck Creation (Modern)
  • posted a message on 8Rack
    I think deck's concept is weak right now. All these decks that WANT to have some cards in the graveyard.. Usual card advantage game doesnt apply to them, so 8Rack is not functional against them.
    Posted in: Control
  • posted a message on Skred Red
    How is Skred going nowadays? With 4x Relics main it can be good at hosing these graveyard strategies going rampant. Last time Skred made a splash in a similar situation - it wasnt played much and Dredge was played much, so Skred came out winning those unprepared people and grave decks.
    Posted in: Control
  • posted a message on [Deck] Modern Slivers
    Quote from patbou_clone »
    For those of you who like numbers, I’ve run 100.000 simulations of two different decks, just to test keepable hands : my deck with 4 Virulents and 16 lands, and another with 2 Automaton and 2 Ziggurats instead. Surprisingly, the deck with 16 lands and more Weenies was more keepable than the one with 18 lands, and by a wide margin... 78% vs 63%, if I recall correctly.
    I bet a build with 18 lands has more win percentage than 16 lands. And your algorithm for keepable hands is most probably flawed) Playing one 1-drop per turn is a road to defeat.
    No one plays 16 lands in Modern for a reason
    And this deck is no exception, yes it wants to play 1 drops, but its power comes from 2 drops, which is a problem at 16 lands (2 cmc mana dork is not a solution)
    Posted in: Deck Creation (Modern)
  • posted a message on Stompy
    Quote from BbearZ »
    My initial interpretations of Hexdrinker and Barkhide Troll were incorrect. We should definitely test them out. We have to either cut lands or Steel Leaf Champion or a mixture of both for them though.

    Also Veil of Summer is an auto include as a 2-3 of in the sideboard- maybe 4 of. The only reason not to is your specific meta doesn't have blue or black.
    I dont see Veil of Summer as great card in theory. Whats its ceiling? You 2-for-1 them, saving one of your janky creatures. Im not sure such card advantage is even good vs decks that want to grind, grinding is their game, they will outplay you if you give them time. Not to mention you have hexproof, pumps, undying and regeneration, so another hexproof can be superfluous. Its floor being a blank card you cant use, because blue and black decks dont pack much removal and counterspells these days. Overall I think thats a weak sideboard card. If I want to grind Id be happier with Kitchen Finks, aside from 2-1 it can deal damage and kill planeswalkers, more synergic with our pumps and gains life. Also not only applicable vs blue and black.
    Posted in: Aggro & Tempo
  • posted a message on [Deck] Modern Slivers
    Quote from patbou_clone »
    I think MTG Nexus deserves a chance. Developers have put money on the table after they’ve been told MTGSalvation was to close, before a rival company took over and decided to maintain the site. Please have a look at MTGNexus. It’s awesome, with excellent tools on the front page, truly beautiful primers, and a superb look everywhere.

    I would prefer the community to move there, but I can’t force anyone...
    I checked that site and it looks like it has 100 times less visits. You are the only poster in that thread there, Im not going to move.
    Posted in: Deck Creation (Modern)
  • posted a message on Stompy
    Quote from tokaok »
    Lets Talk Sideboard for the current meta, What cards are you high on, which one are you down?

    High on:
    Pithing Needle
    Hits most of the fast turn 2/3 win decks, Altar of dementia, Griselbrand, Devoted druid,inkmoth nexus,Pendelhaven giver of runes, plus hits most threats in UW control Celestial Colonnade walkers


    Down on:
    Damping Sphere
    Storm has not seen much play in while, and for the time being Tron isnt very prevalent due to all the turn 2/3 decks running rampant.

    Nissa, Voice of Zendikar
    Apart from U/W, you barely see any midrange/control decks around.
    Shutting off Altar of dementia, Griselbrand, inkmoth nexus, Pendelhaven, giver of runes, Celestial Colonnade, walkers doesnt sound great to me. Hogaak can win without altar, Griselbrand can still fly for 7 lifelink
    inkmoth nexus, Pendelhaven from infect? Nexus is only one third of their threats (or less if you count Hierarch), Pendelhaven has small effect
    disabling one walker after he used his ability doesnt look gread. If you cast Needle in advance its hard to name a proper walker since they usually dont run sets of four. Celestial Colonnade is very expensive, if you didnt win before or coudlnt counter it with pumps seems like you lost anyway.
    though it looks ok vs Affinity, they have a lot of good targets so Needle is not likely to be wasted

    Damping Sphere. Tron, Phoenix are still top decks, Storm, Amulet Titan are still good. I dont see a reason to remove great sideboard card for our tough matchups.

    Nissa, Voice of Zendikar. I like Finks, they are great for aggro and grinding.

    What do you guys think about the new one drop hexdrinker that was added lately?
    Do you think its good enough in our deck?
    I think Pelt Collector is better as a pretty reliable 3/3. Hexdrinker can be better than Dryad, it depends on your meta and number of mana sinks in your list (less mana sinks > Hexdrinker more valuable).
    Posted in: Aggro & Tempo
  • posted a message on Stompy
    Ill put them instead of Tuskers for sure
    Not going to replace Pelt Collectors, I think they are essential
    Posted in: Aggro & Tempo
  • posted a message on Stompy
    FNM 4-0 report

    I will probably go
    +1 Scavenging Ooze
    +1 Reclamation Sage
    -1 Ghost Quarter
    -1 Natural State
    and replace two forests with canopy lands main

    Burn 2-1
    +3 Kitchen Finks -Dismember -Rhonas -Aspect of Hydra

    Golgari budget 2-0
    Thats a slow pet deck that tries to exchange cards with opponent and take lategame with overwhelming card advantage via grave use
    My start was fast, their removal couldnt hold my onslaugh both games
    +3 Kitchen Finks -Dismember -2 Aspect of Hydra

    Revolt Zoo 2-0
    That was an explosive deck with Simian Spirit Guide, Burning-Tree Emissary, Hidden Herbalists Atarka's Command and Reckless Bushwhacker. In ideal world it does 14 damage on its first turn!
    I knew this deck was really explosive so I tried to hold its onslaught first. He didnt get one of his insane starts and I won because if you stabilize then it usually over as your creatures are more powerful than his bears
    +3 Kitchen Finks -Dismember -Aspect of Hydra -Rhonas

    Martyr Proc 2-0
    Fast starts didnt let him get 6/6 lifelinks, he did a lot of champ blocks though he couldnt effectively block trample, I knew wrathes were coming so I didnt hesitate to exchange some of my one-drops with his 1/1s, he landed one wrath and it was good but I answered with Steel Leaf Champion with Rancor and he couldnt respond in time
    +2 Relic -Dismember -Aspect of Hydra
    Posted in: Aggro & Tempo
  • posted a message on [Deck] Modern Slivers
    patbou_clone thank yo for your work on good build with sideboard guide
    But your stress on Humans makes me want to say: Slivers are not Humans
    Same cards work a bit different, Ancient Ziggurat doesnt count for Sliver's Hive, we dont have etb effects (mostly), less things can be done with Vial narrowing to +1/+1 and first strike (because of that I always thought 3 and 0 are better Vial numbers than 4)
    Both tribes have weak and strong sides, we should build accordingly and not try to replicate
    Im not a fan of playing 18 lands in Slivers. Humans have 1cmc mana dork, Slivers dont. Mana flood hurts Humans, Slivers have Sliver's Hive
    At 18 lands if you dont have Vial in opening hand there is a good chance you will lose in tempo horribly playing 0-1 creatures a turn
    Slivers lack Humans' disruption so imho we should play more aggressively (with Diffusion and Manaweft being not so great)
    Im not saying you have some clear mistakes or there are some rules in building Slivers (unlike you who says there are 52 locked slots))) but you are too much on 'if pros build Humans like this, it should be good in Slivers'
    And a bit too high on Slivers with statements like "Diffusion Sliver is actually better than Kitesail Freebooter". Freebooter can discard Karn or Ugin, 2 for 1 a removal, evasive threat that can fly above 5/5 Angler or Tarmo to kill a walker.
    I want to mention Slivers (and fast Slivers in particular) are most afraid of Wrath effects and 8 Diffusions dont help here
    Im long player of Leeching Sliver. While its cool, it deals damage before opponent can block, opponent can misplay against it, I always treated Adaptive Automaton as a better creature which we should play full playset before adding Leeching Sliver. Maybe with 8 flying slivers its drawbacks (no additional toughness) are less important, while drawbacks of Adaptive Automaton stay the same: 3cmc, not a sliver on the stack, artifact.

    Posted in: Deck Creation (Modern)
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.