- Timba
- Registered User
-
Member for 10 years, 8 months, and 25 days
Last active Tue, Mar, 2 2021 11:59:23
- 0 Followers
- 707 Total Posts
- 117 Thanks
-
May 30, 2019Timba posted a message on The End of an Eramtgs could partner with sites like starcitygames, cardkingdom or tcgplayer to make profitPosted in: Articles
-
May 29, 2019Timba posted a message on The End of an Erahow is this possiblePosted in: Articles
sites like this should be profitable
if they lose money on it, they should sell it
if they cant part with engine or something else, copy forum database to a new site with free engine, make some banners and be profitable - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I didnt play Arcum's Astrolabe but I like it. There was something missing playing Mind Stone on t2 and passing with mana but nothing to play with it. With Relic of Progenitus losing its value we can replace some with AA. Also we can add more utility lands and not worry about missing red mana. Thining a deck is also good. And pumping Skred
New dragon Opportunistic Dragon can be nice for Dragon Skred, I never liked Thunderbreak Regent and Verix Bladewing was kinda slow
How is Gemstone Mine performing? Canopy lands? Ziggurat?
Also could you accumulate more data before posting please. With 2-3 matches per post it will take a full page before we get to reliable statistics
https://www.mtggoldfish.com/articles/much-abrew-slivers-modern-magic-online
My question is about a trigger that has no choices, has no visual effects on resolve or on going into stack etc if this is not obvious
Lets say he has a creature that has "When this attacks alone, it gets indestructible until end of turn"
Creature attacks alone and I want to block or not depending on whether it has indestructible or not
still hard to cast, but effect is powerful to make room for a pair in sideboards
Chalice is good against Death Shadow, Infect. Semi good vs Whirza, Affinity, Storm, Ad Nauseam. I cant say its even semi good vs Burn, its playable, but Burn is fast and supposedly already played its threats before you want to counter them with Chalice. Now it even hedges its Bolts with another 3 cmc spell.
In my opinion Chalice is more of a sideboard card now. In many matchups it doesnt do much and without much interaction we just need to be fast, meaning more 1 drops which are not going well with Chalice.
I think its better with 21 lands to make t2 Chalice more reliable
Necrotic is kinda weak at 20 lands with no mana slivers
First Dregscale should be good, 4th - weak
Horizon lands I think are not that great, we have a lot of mana sinks
No one plays 16 lands in Modern for a reason
And this deck is no exception, yes it wants to play 1 drops, but its power comes from 2 drops, which is a problem at 16 lands (2 cmc mana dork is not a solution)
inkmoth nexus, Pendelhaven from infect? Nexus is only one third of their threats (or less if you count Hierarch), Pendelhaven has small effect
disabling one walker after he used his ability doesnt look gread. If you cast Needle in advance its hard to name a proper walker since they usually dont run sets of four. Celestial Colonnade is very expensive, if you didnt win before or coudlnt counter it with pumps seems like you lost anyway.
though it looks ok vs Affinity, they have a lot of good targets so Needle is not likely to be wasted
Damping Sphere. Tron, Phoenix are still top decks, Storm, Amulet Titan are still good. I dont see a reason to remove great sideboard card for our tough matchups.
Nissa, Voice of Zendikar. I like Finks, they are great for aggro and grinding.
I think Pelt Collector is better as a pretty reliable 3/3. Hexdrinker can be better than Dryad, it depends on your meta and number of mana sinks in your list (less mana sinks > Hexdrinker more valuable).