MTG Salvation

Comment Hidden

Comment Hidden

Yes to both.

1. Your opponent has two openings to activate ooze and take away delirium.
First is after Ishkanah is cast, while it is still a spell on the stack. When the spider resolves the trigger condition will not be true and there will be no trigger to create spiders.
Second is after Ishkanah enters play and triggers, but before the trigger resolves. Delirium must be true both for the trigger to go off and also when the trigger resolves.

2. Ishkanah and the 3 spiders created by the trigger are each a creature and they each will trigger Path to Discovery.

Because layers.

Yixid's ability-removing effect and Snapcaster's ability-adding effect are both applied in layer 6. Since they are in the same layer, they are applied in time-stamp order. Abilities inherent to the card are first removed by jailer then, with jailer already in play, snapcaster adds an ability.

If snapcaster was played first to give a card flashback and jailer came into play after, the ability would be removed.

Comment Hidden

yes. The prowess trigger goes on the stack above the ponder. You get priority to act before the prowess trigger resolves and also after it resolves before ponder resolves.

I play Deadguy until now with two Top. I'm not super bummed. I'm going to try one or two more Smuggler's Copter to fill the selection roll. I'm mostly more excited for all the everything to come out of the woodwork and how the existing meta decks turn to attack each other now that Miracles is gone (is it?).

Condolences to the bereaved.

Active player(who's turn it is) puts all their triggers on the stack first in order they chose. Then non-active player does the same. The triggers of the person whos turn it is will resolve last.

603.3b If multiple abilities have triggered since the last time a player received priority, each player, in APNAP order, puts triggered abilities he or she controls on the stack in any order he or she chooses. (See rule 101.4.) Then the game once again checks for and resolves state-based actions until none are performed, then abilities that triggered during this process go on the stack. This process repeats until no new state-based actions are performed and no abilities trigger. Then the appropriate player gets priority.

101.4. If multiple players would make choices and/or take actions at the same time, the active player (the player whose turn it is) makes any choices required, then the next player in turn order (usually the player seated to the active player’s left) makes any choices required, followed by the remaining nonactive players in turn order. Then the actions happen simultaneously. This rule is often referred to as the “Active Player, Nonactive Player (APNAP) order” rule.

yes to both

I'm in the "that's what modern is for" camp. Why pull the rug out from underneath an exiting and loved format when "no reserved list Legacy" is perfectly achievable by, you know, reprinting cards and adding them to the modern?

This is the Rulings forum, not the "debate whether zero creatures can have power 1 or greater" forum. A vehicle can only be crewed if the sum of the tapped creature or creatures' power meets or exceeds the crew cost. Anything else is baseless nonsense that has no place in this forum. Thread locked.

In this case the ability of Illusionist's Bracers will trigger and when it resolves, Dominating Licid's ability is copied. When the copy resolves, Dominating Licid loses the activated ability (but this doesn't prevent the other ability still on the stack from resolving [C.R. 112.7a]), becomes an Aura, and is attached to the targeted creature. But since Dominating Licid isn't a creature anymore (C.R. 205.1a), and because an Equipment "can't legally be attached to an object that isn't a creature" (C.R. 301.5), Illusionist's Bracers will fall off as a state-based action (C.R. 704.5n). When the original resolves, Dominating Licid again loses the ability, again becomes an Aura, and is attached to the creature targeted by that ability (which may be different from the copy's target). Note that a player can't gain control of two creatures this way (if a different creature was targeted for the copy than for the original), since Dominating Licid will attach to one creature, then another, and the effect setting the creature's controller applies only to the creature it enchants (C.R. 611.3a). Moreover, to completely end the effects of Dominating Licid's abilities, UU must be paid, since the two effects overlap.

EDIT (Sep. 28): One rule was renumbered with Ixalan.

@Ray & Otto: Please take a close look at the original OP's question; it is a very basic, beginner's question.
Not only has it been correctly answered by Thought Criminal, it also is obvious that this techno-babble of yours is way beyond the OP's grasp.
Thus useless, and annoying. Please stop. Now.
No, no, don't respond, Just remain gone, please.

Comment Hidden