2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on [LTR] There and Back Again — EmptyG Gaming preview
    Quote from jshrwd »
    Fourteen? Geez


    One for each dwarf and Bilbo.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Is there an "Insurrection" for artifacts?
    That’s what I was afraid of,
    Thanks!
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on Is there an "Insurrection" for artifacts?
    Title says it all, is there a spell that does what Insurrection does for creatures, but for artifacts instead?
    Posted in: Magic General
  • posted a message on Greater Realm and CoP Q:
    Quote from Rezzahan »
    While you can activate any time during your turn, and the effect will last the entire turn, you have to choose the source right when the ability resolves. If there's no eligible source to choose, the ability does nothing. You can't choose a Lightning Bolt, that hasn't been cast yet, for example.

    609.7a If an effect requires a player to choose a source of damage, they may choose a permanent; a
    spell on the stack (including a permanent spell); any object referred to by an object on the stack,
    by a replacement or prevention effect that’s waiting to apply, or by a delayed triggered ability
    that’s waiting to trigger (even if that object is no longer in the zone it used to be in); or a face-up
    object in the command zone. A source doesn’t need to be capable of dealing damage to be a
    legal choice. The source is chosen when the effect is created. If the player chooses a permanent,
    the effect will apply to the next damage dealt by that permanent, regardless of whether it’s
    combat damage or damage dealt as the result of a spell or ability. If the player chooses a
    permanent spell, the effect will apply to any damage dealt by that spell and any damage dealt by
    the permanent that spell becomes when it resolves.


    Thank you. Was having a rules discussion in another forum, and this was the conclusion we came to but it's nice to have your clarification.
    Posted in: Magic Rulings
  • posted a message on Greater Realm and CoP Q:
    I understand that when you activate a Greater Realm of Preservation or a Circle of Protection that you don't choose the source of damage until the ability resolves, but what I'm wondering is is how far in advance can you activate one of those abilities?
    Say during my upkeep my opponent Mana Shorts me, can I dump mana in to a Circle of Protection: Red and then wait until later in the turn to choose what that source will be?
    Posted in: Magic Rulings
  • posted a message on Replacement effect Q:
    If I have out Teferi's Ageless Insight, Alhammarret's Archive, and a Howling Mine, am I drawing 5 cards per turn? One for my initial draw and 4 for my second draw? Do both the Insight and Archive each give me 2 cards for that second draw?
    Or are both out redundant?
    Posted in: Magic Rulings
  • posted a message on WACKY RACES!

    I didn't realize your version could block with standard creatures... I could honestly see it both ways. I wanted to make it as close to your version as possible. So sorry I missed that little detail!


    I think for your video it was better to play the way you did. More people are familiar with the rules on reddit than those posted here.
    I'm considering adopting it that way for my playgroup.
    And besides, SpiceTrader56 is doing a much better job at curating the format than I.
    Posted in: Homebrew and Variant Formats
  • posted a message on WACKY RACES!
    @perodequeso
    We tried your format! I loved it so much I made a video for you! Hope you like it! There's also gameplay footage as well!
    https://youtu.be/UZtPIujDpQM

    I saw both, very cool. That dude wearing red is a stitch. Happy to see people enjoying this, I never really expected anyone outside my playgroups to even consider it.

    I just want to point out a tiny rules nitpick; in my version of the rules non-Vehicle creatures can attack planeswalkers and can block attacking vehicles. The guys over on the subreddit amended the rules to only allowing vehicles to attack and block. I think their way is more intuitive.
    Posted in: Homebrew and Variant Formats
  • posted a message on WACKY RACES!
    @ Lord of the Sandwiches, cool that you've given my format a shot. Mixing with Oathbreaker seems like an interesting variant.
    I just discovered there's a subreddit dedicated to the format. That's just crazy to me.
    Glad you're all enjoying it.
    Posted in: Homebrew and Variant Formats
  • posted a message on Persecutor vs. Approach
    Thanks all.
    Posted in: Magic Rulings
  • posted a message on Persecutor vs. Approach
    Thanks.

    Follow up question: if a player, in multiplayer, casts their second Approach of the Second Sun and another player responds with Angel's Grace,
    that would get around the Approach, correct?
    Posted in: Magic Rulings
  • posted a message on Persecutor vs. Approach
    In a four player game, player 1 has out an Abyssal Persecutor and player 2 casts their second Approach of the Second Sun. What’s the end result?
    Does only player 1 lose?
    Posted in: Magic Rulings
  • posted a message on [LTR] Lord of the Rings first look stream on YouTube
    Quote from caulkwrangler »
    Quote from Perodequeso »
    @caulkwrangler, it's been many years since I've read all the source material, but I remember specifically coming away with the impression that Tom Bombadil
    was indeed the most powerful character in Middle-Earth.


    Ok. What is your point though? And how are you defining power?


    He is free from the influence, power, and machinations of the other powerful beings of Middle-earth. He is independent from the influence of the rings. And he is ancient beyond time, when compared to the Maiar. Only Eru and Melkor are more powerful than Tom, that we can say we know of. While it is entirely, hypothetically possible in a straight out battle that Sauron, in possession of the Ring, could have defeated Tom, that's not the sort of thing Tom would even engage in.
    Tom, unlike Sauron for instance, is power but he does not wield power.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on [LTR] Lord of the Rings first look stream on YouTube
    Quote from Caranthir »
    Quote from Caranthir »
    So, not only Aragorn, but Galadriel and Eowyn as well.

    At Reprieve, she looks a lot like just a tiny bit darker Olivia Clarke's Daenerys. And on the Commander deck, assuming it is ALSO Eowyn (because, well, there is exactly NONE other Rohirrim female warrior character), she looks substantially different, with a bronze complexion at best and different facial physiology.

    Well, their choice. I won't be mad about it, but I would have not mind them being more true to the source.
    Eh, I think Tom Bombadil getting the God creature type is a bigger deviation than skin color. Tolkien left everything but Tom not being a God to speculation. Elder Bard would've worked better.


    Yeah, but frankly, I always considered Tom Bombadil a god, something as an aspect of Ilúvatar himself on at least Valar level, so I do not quite mind.
    Quote from Gizlivadi »
    Bombadil being a god or, more specifically, a manifestation of the mystery of Creation/The Author itself, beyond even the Valar, while never part of the canon, is something that can be at least deduced from canonical material.
    But the entire point of Tom is he's outside this entire War of the Ring situation. He's no god, no man, just an old man named Tom who doesn't stop singing. If anything, Elder Bard, just Elder, just Bard, or full Nameless Race would have worked just as well, if not better.

    I don't recall at the moment where, but it is specified that Tom is one of the Maiar, on the same order as Mairon/Sauron and the Istari. Thing is, he's an unusually powerful Maia, due to his bond with the land he inhabits.

    The Ring does work on Maiar, because it was made for use by one, and they can do even greater things with it - Gandalf and Saruman, for example - but Tom is the only character in the book who handles the Ring and is completely unaffected by it. He is free from desire and temptation because the land (which his power sustains) provides him with everything he could ever want or need. Because of this, and quite frankly because he embodied the author's ideals of a quiet, pastoral life in harmony with nature, he was strong enough that if Sauron ever did get his Precious back and conquer everything, he still wouldn't have been able to touch Tom's territory.

    Most readers don't take him seriously because of his clownish nature and goofy singing, but it is made abundantly clear in the narrative that anything evil has cause to fear Tom Bombadil.

    The God typing is probably to represent that level of power, which is sort of in between the Maiar and the Valar. The Valar are never specifically said to be gods, but they wield godlike power and are venerated by the Elves, who knew them in the youth of their people. But they are about as close to gods as most mortals will ever interact with, since they're sort of meant to be Eru Ilúvatar's intermediaries for dealing with Creation. Honestly they're more like archangels, in keeping with Tolkien's catholicism and its influence on Arda's cosmology, but they absolutely would get God typing if they were printed as cards, since they fill much the same overall role as gods do in Magic. Immensely powerful, huge, awe-inspiring, smiters of evil and saviors of mortals, rather than omnipotent creator-demiurges.


    So much this.
    Right. My thought is that in MTG the God creature type is the only power level to express Tom.
    From what I've read he's the most powerful character that's encountered in the story.

    @caulkwrangler, it's been many years since I've read all the source material, but I remember specifically coming away with the impression that Tom Bombadil
    was indeed the most powerful character in Middle-Earth.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • posted a message on Gauntlets of Chaos and targeting
    A player activates Gauntlets of Chaos choosing two artifacts, another player Disenchants one of the targets, can the Gauntlet's controller then choose a new target?
    I'm thinking no, because of the Gatherer rulings. That destroying one of the targets renders the ability null.
    Is "no target" the same as an illegal target for the purposes of Gauntlets of Chaos' ability?
    Once the targets are chosen, those targets are then "locked in", correct?

    EDIT: I think I got my answer in CR 115.1. That once chosen those are the targets.
    Posted in: Magic Rulings
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.