2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • posted a message on Mafia Classic: Wolves vs. Mafia (Game Over - Town Win)
    Quote from Nachomamma8 »
    @Rodemy: Whatever wagon you're asking about, I thought it was dumb.




    You're dumb >:(


    Quote from Zionite »
    Would you care to explain the mindset where you are sure of two scum and you also don't want to run someone up?


    I am voting tom, am I not....

    What the hell?

    Lemme quote myself here





    Quote from Rodemy »

    Mkay

    unvote vote Wildfire



    Quote from Wildfire393 »
    Quote from OceanBlack »
    That's right.

    Does your vote for Nachomamma8 have anything to do with his declaration that he was town?


    Yes, actually. Looking at his recently-completed games, this isn't something he's done as either alignment. And he's been town in his most-recent handful so it's not like he has a reason to be excited to "finally" be town.


    I don't buy it. "Because rvs" What were you calling out "he did" I am actually serious in this question.



    I never played governer but here is why i thought it wasnt town:

    We vote someone we think is scum and we go to lynch, he can stop it, lynchee is not flipped, and we go to night. Is this a one shot per person? Because that sounds like you can stop a scum from being lynched once. Not multiple times. I can see it as a scum role. You can save them once and move on, we wont know their alignment (which in a two scumteam game, seems pretty useful)

    How can town benefit from this role? It kind of means that we have to agree with him or we get a no lynch. If he is scum, he can use this to destroy the entire town.

    Why am i the only one who sees this power as evil?


    As for proving it: we send someone up to lynch, mkay? He will HAVE to "pardon" that person regardless, and then what? It just proves he can stop lynches.

    He can also just run someone up using this claim as a guide and then "oops" roleblocked.

    I don't like this claim out front after wildfire was convieniently egging him on about claiming town. It seems forced and preplanned, esspecially since he explained the "benifits" of claiming and how there is no way this can be scum.

    That being said, Wildfire, answer my question.





    Yuup. There we go. I was stating the scenario on how he proves it. I never said: lets do this..
    I am for lynching scum, but if he proves his role tonight, that just proves he can stop lynches. And he would have stopped a svum lynch (given we actually lynch scum)
    Posted in: Mafia
  • posted a message on Mafia Classic: Wolves vs. Mafia (Game Over - Town Win)
    @sep

    I DID claim Town Rodemy.
    Posted in: Mafia
  • posted a message on Mafia Classic: Wolves vs. Mafia (Game Over - Town Win)
    Quote from DoTArchon »
    Quote from Rodemy »

    First off, i am voting someone. So no, i dont support a no lynch.

    Second, i totally didnt think about the fact his role can be used during day only.... either way, his claim seems forced and planned. Sticking to that for now.
    Quote from Rodemy »
    And by the looks of it, tom is on the chopping block. Lets do this

    unvote vote tomsloger

    Oh Govnah, what are your thoughts on this wagon?


    Let's look at the 2 bolded parts. You say you do not support a Day 1 no lynch, and use the fact that you are voting someone as a counter argument. BUT, you want to force Nachos to prove his claim by running someone up quickly and getting him to pardon them. THIS WILL RESULT IN A NO LYNCH!!!

    That last comment seems especially off to me. How about this. Let's run you up for a lynch, and we'll see if Nachos feels like pardoning you...


    Woaaahhh there buddy, i don't want to run someone up. The original post was me stating why that sounded like a stupid idea.

    And i want to know Nachos thoughts on the wagon.


    So there is two scum....
    Posted in: Mafia
  • posted a message on Mafia Classic: Wolves vs. Mafia (Game Over - Town Win)
    And by the looks of it, tom is on the chopping block. Lets do this

    unvote vote tomsloger

    Oh Govnah, what are your thoughts on this wagon?
    Posted in: Mafia
  • posted a message on Mafia Classic: Wolves vs. Mafia (Game Over - Town Win)
    Quote from DoTArchon »
    Quote from Rodemy »
    As for proving it: we send someone up to lynch, mkay? He will HAVE to "pardon" that person regardless, and then what? It just proves he can stop lynches.

    He can also just run someone up using this claim as a guide and then "oops" roleblocked.


    So you support a no-lynch for day 1. Say we test your theory, run someone up to lynch, and Nachos pardons it. We go to night and he gets NK'd. Wasted effort.

    How could he be Roleblocked? His power is specifically used during the day.

    Unvote, Vote:Rodemy


    First off, i am voting someone. So no, i dont support a no lynch.

    Second, i totally didnt think about the fact his role can be used during day only.... either way, his claim seems forced and planned. Sticking to that for now.
    Posted in: Mafia
  • posted a message on Mafia Classic: Wolves vs. Mafia (Game Over - Town Win)
    Bahh. Im not buying wildfire as town.

    Nor am i buying tom as town.

    Nor do i think nacho is town.

    In that order, is my biggest to least scum reads.

    Sorry, if i repeat a question, it's because the mobile app of this site really ****s with my adhd and i can't concentrate for *****. I will try my hardest to post from a cpu tomorrow.
    Posted in: Mafia
  • posted a message on Mafia Classic: Wolves vs. Mafia (Game Over - Town Win)


    @tom. Holy *****, this is the second time you have answered something I have specifically directed at wildfire. Staahhp

    But if you Reaaaaaally wanna go...

    Quote from tomsloger »
    also, ive been led to believe that gaming the setup is a losing proposition, but does anyone think that the werewolf team may have the ability to recruit/infect/whatever you want to call it?
    that possibility really makes me hate the proposition of not lynching (be it by getting on GJ's no lynch wagon or by nacho blocking the lynch)


    You have been led to believe? By.. whom?... what?... this is a very odd thing to say.

    Posted in: Mafia
  • posted a message on Mafia Classic: Wolves vs. Mafia (Game Over - Town Win)

    Mkay

    unvote vote Wildfire



    Quote from Wildfire393 »
    Quote from OceanBlack »
    That's right.

    Does your vote for Nachomamma8 have anything to do with his declaration that he was town?


    Yes, actually. Looking at his recently-completed games, this isn't something he's done as either alignment. And he's been town in his most-recent handful so it's not like he has a reason to be excited to "finally" be town.


    I don't buy it. "Because rvs" What were you calling out "he did" I am actually serious in this question.



    I never played governer but here is why i thought it wasnt town:

    We vote someone we think is scum and we go to lynch, he can stop it, lynchee is not flipped, and we go to night. Is this a one shot per person? Because that sounds like you can stop a scum from being lynched once. Not multiple times. I can see it as a scum role. You can save them once and move on, we wont know their alignment (which in a two scumteam game, seems pretty useful)

    How can town benefit from this role? It kind of means that we have to agree with him or we get a no lynch. If he is scum, he can use this to destroy the entire town.

    Why am i the only one who sees this power as evil?


    As for proving it: we send someone up to lynch, mkay? He will HAVE to "pardon" that person regardless, and then what? It just proves he can stop lynches.

    He can also just run someone up using this claim as a guide and then "oops" roleblocked.

    I don't like this claim out front after wildfire was convieniently egging him on about claiming town. It seems forced and preplanned, esspecially since he explained the "benifits" of claiming and how there is no way this can be scum.

    That being said, Wildfire, answer my question.



    Posted in: Mafia
  • posted a message on Mafia Classic: Wolves vs. Mafia (Game Over - Town Win)
    Oh *****, i did mention a vote. My b.

    Disregard previous shade.
    Posted in: Mafia
  • posted a message on Mafia Classic: Wolves vs. Mafia (Game Over - Town Win)
    Quote from tomsloger »
    @oceanblack yes, thats what i said... they all seem to be fairly clear with the possible exception of "ha! love the flashback!" which was a reference to my attack on tappingstones changing his tone after Day 1 in my first game.

    @rodemy im not voting you. nor is anyone as far as i can tell.
    and youre asking why wildfire said something with his rvs vote. i can answer it for you: because rvs.


    I... never said anything about you voting me. Strange you shouls mention that at all.

    Also, i asked wildfire. Soooooo....

    Posted in: Mafia
  • posted a message on Mafia Classic: Wolves vs. Mafia (Game Over - Town Win)
    Quote from tomsloger »


    You forgot something here...

    like what is it about Rodemy you don't like. I think it's weird you mention you don't like Rodemy as if you've mentioned him before, but you never have.

    @NACHOMMA...

    Can you "Governor" yourself?
    great question to nacho. i wish i would have thought of it...

    rodemy hasnt really said anything of note. just something about his "claim" of town rodemy. unsolicited and meaningless.
    then he rvs votes, then changes to a real vote because of a claim that happened BEFORE his rvs vote.

    would you like to answer my question now?


    Rodemy only has a phone. And has a life brah. Get off ma dick ♡

    Also, sunglasses coolpizza was a profile i made for a mafia game long ago, i meant to come out and say it was me, but alas, life.

    First post was to just get in there. In fact, there was a question there i kind of wanted answered.. sooo could it please be answered?

    Also: i am pretty sure not everyone is in this game yet, so if you wanna vote me based on post count and quality, then you sir are being a scum. Vote stays, i wanna see where this governor thing goes.


    Posted in: Mafia
  • posted a message on Mafia Classic: Wolves vs. Mafia (Game Over - Town Win)
    unvote vote nacho

    Posted in: Mafia
  • posted a message on Mafia Classic: Wolves vs. Mafia (Game Over - Town Win)
    What. The. ****.

    Town governor. Governor does not sound like a town role.... whatsoever.

    Nor does it sound conducive to town.

    Ergo

    [B]unvote vote nacho [\b]
    Posted in: Mafia
  • posted a message on Mafia Classic: Wolves vs. Mafia (Game Over - Town Win)
    Quote from Wildfire393 »
    Quote from OceanBlack »
    That's right.

    Does your vote for Nachomamma8 have anything to do with his declaration that he was town?


    Yes, actually. Looking at his recently-completed games, this isn't something he's done as either alignment. And he's been town in his most-recent handful so it's not like he has a reason to be excited to "finally" be town.



    Explain why you said "you know what you did."

    Claim: sunglasses coolpizza. Town rodemy.

    Vote: Sepple. Cuz Seppel ♡♡
    Posted in: Mafia
  • posted a message on Mafia Classic: Wolves vs. Mafia (Game Over - Town Win)
    /conform
    Posted in: Mafia
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.