2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 3

    posted a message on [MH1] [CUBE] Cabal Therapist
    I've changed my mind about this card. I think I'm gonna run it just so I can say "I'll take cabal the rapist for $200, Alex".
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on 36 planeswalkers in war of the spark officially confirmed also stained glass art in better view
    Quote from AtraxianShade »
    I'm not sure they would want to reprint another Vampire Hexmage at uncommon, tho.


    I mean, Hexmage already exists, dark depths is already banned in modern, and I doubt a 2nd hexmage is gonna suddenly break the deck in legacy.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 6

    posted a message on Every booster will have a planeswalker in WAR
    Quote from leslak »

    In all seiouly wizards is on a hiatus with Garruk because redit users think Triumph of Ferocity is ofensive and the character should be killed to never be remembered again. I don't want to start a controversity but outrage about minimal and ridicule things is a thing in the "mtg community" even Jin Davis and PewDiePie can't escape the outrage.


    I like to know how this rumor started.
    It's pretty clear that Garruk storyline was a mess even before the outrage. He was supposed to be cured by Avacyn. But suddenly they decided to make him even more corrupt.
    "hey we have a problem, you know that character that was supposed to be cured by his curse? We have a backlash because he's too violent and embodies toxic masculinity"
    "i know what to do! Retcon his cure and make him even more violent and unstable!"

    it's clear that they changed Garruk's destiny abruptly and not because of the backlash.

    Now he's in a limbo because they retconned Liliana into some sort of tragic heroine and you can't bring Garruk back without showing that Liliana was actually a big, chaotic evil ***** without any good or anti-heroic intention.


    There was some backlash against the art (given the history of domestic violence), so a bunch of entitled white males who feel like the game no longer catering specifically to them is the worst thing that could ever happen decided to glom onto this as evidence of the "SJW agenda" to ruin magic.

    It ignores, of course, the fact that we got a garruk a full 2 years AFTER triumph of ferocity, but logic was never the strong suit of that corner of the internet.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Every booster will have a planeswalker in WAR
    Quote from NZB2323 »
    Quote from Malumdiabolus »
    I am betting on flipwalkers for every planeswalker.

    Rosewater essentially confirmed it by talking about the “Crazy” element in the set and alluding to it in other comments on his blog.

    http://markrosewater.tumblr.com/?amp_see_more=1

    You would get every walker as a legendary creature trying to regain their spark after Bolas stole/suppressed it with the Immortal sun.

    It would stop games from being grindy, limit mana issues, and keep you from having to print 30 new planeswalker kill cards.


    Not only that, but that would make all 36 flipwalkers playable as commanders, which would excite a lot
    of players.


    I don't get how he's reaching this conclusion from MaRo's post, when the post clearly states that the PW in every pack itself was the crazy mechanic.

    "bidoofvselite-four asked: So War of the Spark is confirmed to have 36 planeswalkers, with a planeswalker in every pack. Is that the crazy aspect about the set that you're super excited for us you see?

    Yes! : )"

    So, there's no indication here that they are all flip walkers or that there's an additional crazy aspect. Now, they could still all be flip walkers, we don't know, but this isn't very compelling evidence.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Every booster will have a planeswalker in WAR
    Quote from Ree Wicker »
    Also I hope Tibalt's pw card isn't Tibalt, the Fiend-Blooded and they actually do him justice this time.


    MaRo says no reprints, all new - http://markrosewater.tumblr.com/?amp_see_more=1
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Every booster will have a planeswalker in WAR
    I have to imagine most will be utility-level PW's with only minus abilities or no ults, so they will be safe to ignore a lot of the time in limited, otherwise limited would be a massive grind fest.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 2

    posted a message on Mana rocks in unpower... Survey says?
    Quote from mjrsea »
    Sol Ring is amazing, don't get me wrong, but if there are enough other rocks, then I think sol ring is okay. We are talking about 1 card in the entire cube, which you may not even see in a given draft, which goes into a players deck, and is 1 card of 40 that they may not even see. Sol ring on turn 1 is great, sol ring on turn 5 is good.



    If you don't run moxen for power reasons, I can't imagine running Sol Ring, which is just better than the moxen. I also wouldn't run mana crypt, as in a fair number of decks it's just a better sol ring. Especially where the only cards that can reasonably compete with crypt and sol ring are power, so if those are out, sol ring and crypt are just miles away the best card in the cube.

    Library should be out for similar reasons, as without power (and sol ring and crypt), it will be substantially better than any other card in the cube.

    IMO, anything else is fair game. Mind twist has been in my cube since day 1 and never felt broken (a lot of what makes it broken is moxen and sol ring/crypt), tinker and channel are both fragile enough and all-in enough that they don't feel unfair.

    Now, all this is if you want a more balanced power environment. If your group WANTS to try sol ring, crypt, library, etc, go for it! If it's unfun they'll let you know.
    Posted in: The Cube Forum
  • 1

    posted a message on [[SCD]] Steam Augury
    This card ended up being extremely meh for us.

    I'd run 1st ral zarek, electrolyze, and izzet charm of cards I'm not running now (which would get me to 7) before steam augury.
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on [RNA][CUBE] Cindervines
    If I'm playing aggro and my opponent plays this spell, I'm thrilled.
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on [RNA] [CUBE] Light Up the Stage
    Ok, so I COMPLETELY missed that it was until the end of your NEXT turn (despite multiple people mentioning it lol), and now am interested in testing it.
    Posted in: Cube Card and Archetype Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.