In this post, you quote Lennonmint's 155, but you fail to mention his 156, in which he provides some content. Why did you ignore that, if you are attacking him for a lack of content?
You think "But if i was too vote it would be for swishh because he seems to fool around alot which might mean something" is content? He fence-sits, and then says that swishh is fooling around. How? How is swishh fooling around? I provided quotes of Lennon's, showing his weak play. And the noob card is just icing on the cake.
I guess I didn't ignore it?
True: once Rhand called you out on ignoring the content that swishh had provided, you stopped ignoring it. But that doesn't change my question. Why, when writing up post 160 about Lennonmint not providing content, did you quote his post that indeed had no content, while ignoring the post immediately under it that did?
Because it's about as useless as any other post. I only needed one of the recent posts, not all of them. I mean, he says if he was to vote it'd be for swishh... so do it. And "because he seems to fool around alot"? Why not just put "because I feel like it", it's the same amount of information. Which is none.
i was trying to add content to why i would vote for him and not just cast a random vote that meant nothing
But if i was to vote it would be for swishh because he seems to fool around a lot which might mean something
What might it mean that would merit your vote on him?
i changed my vote to Rhand because he asked about double scum voters which i found kinda werid
but i will probably change it as the day progress (ingame) i don't think anything has happened to merit my vote but i wouldn't be giving my opinion if i didn't vote so i voted for him
void, why are you ignoring my vote on you/my suggestion to lynch you while focusing so hard on swishh?
Because I know your game Mr. Santorum. When I see something that is other than baiting for responses/behavior tells, then I will start looking at you differently. For now, since you know the game, I don't see anything wrong with your posts.
Voting people because "they annoy you?" And even worse, as soon as you're called out, you vote the person who called you out on it. Scummy, scummy, scum.
Please explain why this is only a scum mind set option and not a town mind set option.
My name is based off a random paper i found when i was 6 i was trying to come up with an rpg name so my mom looked at some random papers and we got lennonmint its been my name for everything ever since then
My name is based off a random paper i found when i was 6 i was trying to come up with an rpg name so my mom looked at some random papers and we got lennonmint its been my name for everything ever since then
Yeah, my vote's staying here for now. Care to respond to it?
My name is based off a random paper i found when i was 6 i was trying to come up with an rpg name so my mom looked at some random papers and we got lennonmint its been my name for everything ever since then
i was trying to add content to why i would vote for him and not just cast a random vote that meant nothing
i changed my vote to Rhand because he asked about double scum voters which i found kinda werid
but i will probably change it as the day progress (ingame) i don't think anything has happened to merit my vote but i wouldn't be giving my opinion if i didn't vote so i voted for him
your quick to jump on my back its the first day
Why are you voting for me?
1 none
2 Al Capone