Apocalypse Demon is some of the best Magic art I've ever seen. Just looking at it makes me feel like I'm in an artist's imagining of The Divine Comedy.
As is Moaning Wall. Both arts by Piotr Jablonski are fantastic.
Except there are no such things as snow or phyrexian types of mana. These terms are used for mana costs and determine the way those costs should/could be paid.
Why Sixth Sense wording "Enchanted creature has "Whenever this creature deals combat damage to a player, draw a card" is different from regular "Whenever enchanted creature deals combat damage to a player, draw a card"?
Sixth Sense grants an ability to enchanted creature, so:
1) Creature won't be vanilla (Muraganda Petroglyphs)
2) Creature can lose it (Turn to Frog)
3) Creature's controller would control its trigger.
#2, #3 and #4 are almost definitely from actual cards, since files are named KLD_<something>_Gallery.jpg.
Background of #5 looks like tribunes. Gatewatch are fighting on some kind of arena, with Chandra's freedom at stake?
Doesn't work. Token will cease to exist via SBA while "dies" trigger is still on stack, therefore you won't be able to exile it to return a card from graveyard.
"This land enters the battlefield tapped unless there is a card in your command zone" allows vintage and legacy to use them if they have an emblem, experience counter or poison counter, which would be fun.
This wouldn't work like that - emblems and counters aren't cards, disregard of what you use to represent them. More than that, counters even aren't objects themselves, they are just markers placed on object or player.
A couple of predictions:
1) Double-faced card for Liliana, so she would transform into more powerful outfit
2) Missing black Oath of Liliana, with flavor text: "In the name of the moon, I will punish you"
3) Emrakul — an eldritch tentacle monster
Actually they are making a more confusing idea now. They aren't dumbing down the idea they are just now making it harder to cast spells. Imagine with me for a moment if they decided that all artifacts in the future must now have this new symbol in their mana cost and the only way you can cast artifacts is if you control a wasteland. No longer would artifacts be easy to cast in all colours. Surely such a change doesn't make sense since colourless artifacts were originally designed to be used by any colour and not restricted to any specific land type.
And here you gave a perfect example of issue, that will be solved by new mana symbol. It will remove inconsistency of 1 - currently it means either production of 1 colorless mana by mana abilities, or cost of 1 any mana in costs. So, introducing <> will not change functionality of any already existing card, but will allow WoTC to create cards with colorless-only mana costs.
Of course you could also randomly hose the guy who shows up with a Starfield of Nyx deck by taking out a bazillion enchantments with it at once.
Funny thing is I'm going to play both Arrogance and Starfield - killing all except one of opponent's creatures is a very nice bonus to restarting my Demonic Pacts
twicky_kid, reread Chandra - she flips only as a part of her tap ability, so you still need to untap her after attack. bokchoykn, certainly, Jace is not a Snapcaster (which is just too good and left type-2 quite a time ago), but it doesn't mean he's bad. Tap Jace, discard mass removal as your 5+ card in GY, play it by -3. Not a mid-combat, but still unpleasant surprise for your opponent, since board wiped, Jace still alive and you have same amount of cards in hand.
As is Moaning Wall. Both arts by Piotr Jablonski are fantastic.
Sixth Sense grants an ability to enchanted creature, so:
1) Creature won't be vanilla (Muraganda Petroglyphs)
2) Creature can lose it (Turn to Frog)
3) Creature's controller would control its trigger.
Ira Joshi is an Ovalchase Daredevil, so the rest of them could be non-legendary as well.
Background of #5 looks like tribunes. Gatewatch are fighting on some kind of arena, with Chandra's freedom at stake?
This wouldn't work like that - emblems and counters aren't cards, disregard of what you use to represent them. More than that, counters even aren't objects themselves, they are just markers placed on object or player.
1) Double-faced card for Liliana, so she would transform into more powerful outfit
2) Missing black Oath of Liliana, with flavor text: "In the name of the moon, I will punish you"
3) Emrakul — an eldritch tentacle monster
And here you gave a perfect example of issue, that will be solved by new mana symbol. It will remove inconsistency of 1 - currently it means either production of 1 colorless mana by mana abilities, or cost of 1 any mana in costs. So, introducing <> will not change functionality of any already existing card, but will allow WoTC to create cards with colorless-only mana costs.
Funny thing is I'm going to play both Arrogance and Starfield - killing all except one of opponent's creatures is a very nice bonus to restarting my Demonic Pacts
bokchoykn, certainly, Jace is not a Snapcaster (which is just too good and left type-2 quite a time ago), but it doesn't mean he's bad. Tap Jace, discard mass removal as your 5+ card in GY, play it by -3. Not a mid-combat, but still unpleasant surprise for your opponent, since board wiped, Jace still alive and you have same amount of cards in hand.