even if you were right, you are naming GOOD cards(that are obviously undercosted/aggressively costed) compared to the meh cards that rakdos charm is replicating.
it basically comes down to you dont want to play rakdos charm main deck, and its just not a super exciting card in general.
I wasn't trolling, those are facts, checked card per card. I just felt like answering to that one, after seeing a lot of missguidance of tought in this whole threat.
Despite the fact that I am right, I can also say you are right. On the other charms, good cards were replicated, where in this, situational cards were.
But the thing is: How meh are the cards being replicated?
I can tell you for sure that using this charm as 4 side is a lot better than having to pack 2 GY hates and 2 artifacts destro or even more, since because you can fizz with the ammount of cards you want. You have 12 cards in 4. You have 4 Laxes for 2, 4 Ancient grudges and 4 Tormods. In only 4 cards. Do you really think that's bad for a sideboard?
It could be better? Definitely yes. It could be worse? Definitely yes.
The place where mostly everybody is commiting a mistake is where they compare this charm to other charms. Every charm has a function, this one is a banging sideboard card. That's it. If you want to Main it, do it at your own risk. If not, you can sideboard it.
If you're not using it, you can suit yourself and use up 4 burn spell slots, 2 GY hate slots and 3 artifact hate slots or similar.
I can honestly feel for sure that Gatecrash will have worse charms than this, mark my words.
i fail to se how any of selesnya charms abiltiies should cost 1, only the +2 and trample could be argued. also lifelink ability of aorious charms abilities easily cost more than 1. so i don't think that it is fair to say all charms first two abilities have 1 cost abilities.
Selesnya Charm First Ability = Rancor
Selesnya Charm Second Ability = Dispatch, Path to Exile, Soul Snare
Azorius Charm First Ability = Lifelink (Tweaked turn duration, Revamped Creature quantity, unbalanced in favor of tweaked second ability)
Azorius Charm Second Ability = 127 different cards with CMC 1, most of them are better.
I wasn't trolling, those are facts, checked card per card. I just felt like answering to that one, after seeing a lot of missguidance of tought in this whole threat.
Despite the fact that I am right, I can also say you are right. On the other charms, good cards were replicated, where in this, situational cards were.
But the thing is: How meh are the cards being replicated?
I can tell you for sure that using this charm as 4 side is a lot better than having to pack 2 GY hates and 2 artifacts destro or even more, since because you can fizz with the ammount of cards you want. You have 12 cards in 4. You have 4 Laxes for 2, 4 Ancient grudges and 4 Tormods. In only 4 cards. Do you really think that's bad for a sideboard?
It could be better? Definitely yes. It could be worse? Definitely yes.
The place where mostly everybody is commiting a mistake is where they compare this charm to other charms. Every charm has a function, this one is a banging sideboard card. That's it. If you want to Main it, do it at your own risk. If not, you can sideboard it.
If you're not using it, you can suit yourself and use up 4 burn spell slots, 2 GY hate slots and 3 artifact hate slots or similar.
I can honestly feel for sure that Gatecrash will have worse charms than this, mark my words.
Selesnya Charm First Ability = Rancor
Selesnya Charm Second Ability = Dispatch, Path to Exile, Soul Snare
Azorius Charm First Ability = Lifelink (Tweaked turn duration, Revamped Creature quantity, unbalanced in favor of tweaked second ability)
Azorius Charm Second Ability = 127 different cards with CMC 1, most of them are better.
You might want to reconsider.