2019 Holiday Exchange!
 
A New and Exciting Beginning
 
The End of an Era
  • 1

    posted a message on [[DGM]] Emmara Tandris
    Bad design, bad flavor.
    Someone in this RTR block team is just dumb as most of us created cards I'm pretty sure would add more to the game then this...
    Posted in: New Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on [[DGM]] Mirko Vosk, Mind Drinker
    Quote from Ixidior
    This is pointless.

    4/4 or 3/4 that mills until hit X lands where X is the damage dealt is worst than a 2/4 that will always mill until 4 when it hits.


    No it's not. A 2/4 don't make it pass x/3+ flyers such as Restoration Angel and Olivia. 5 manas 2/4 flyer is way, way below the curve while a 5 mana 4/4 is ok. This is not even a limited bomb once many many commons and uncommon in GTC and RTR can block it. What kind of bomb get stopped by a Concordia Pegasus ?
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on [[DGM]] Mirko Vosk, Mind Drinker
    Someone in WotC have no ****ing idea of power level ¬_¬
    This is WEAKER then Air Elemental in any deck but dedicated mill shell. Which means his weaker overall since his narrower and only ''better'' in a unplayable deck.

    PS: I'm not a spike. This is THAT weak.
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 1

    posted a message on Split card breakdown
    Quote from Don_Quixote
    Ahh, okay. My point with Renounce the guilds was not that it was clearly the last white card. My point was that we have a mono-colored rare. I would be shocked if we had more than one mono-color rare in each color. This is five rares.

    The set looks to have thirty-five rare slots. Five mono-colored rares would mean thirty cards left, or ten gold split cards, ten champions, and ten gold guild spells. I really doubt that they'd go for more mono-colored cards over more split cards in the final set of a gold block.

    Also, I'll point out that two split cards beginning with A and one beginning Ba creates three split cards before Beck, and we've had weirder alphabetical distributions before.


    This skeleton is the 'consensus'. It's the only one that fits the number crunch. As you can see there's 2 rares for each mono color, so nothing changes with Renounce the Guilds.

    ...............Common..Uncommon....Rare...Mythic...Total
    Monocolor.....30........10................10......0...........50
    Gold.............30........10................20......10.........70
    Split..............0.........10.................5.......0...........15
    Artifact..........0.........10.................0.......0...........10
    Land.............10........0...................0.......1...........11
    Total.............70.......40................35......11.........156

    * The prediction with no rares at mono color was impossible to fit to begin with because it would requires 20 mono color uncommons, which means we would get no artifacts at all (since uncommons at gold and split are facts at this point). At least 1 rare at monocolor was expected.
    * You suggest that there's -5 Rares at mono color and +5 rares at split. But then we are left with 45 mono color cards, which means we have to add 5 commons or 5 uncommons to the monocolor count. We can't remove 5 cards from gold because those must be a multiple of 10 (1 card for every guild). So we're left with artifacts and splits.

    * So, 10 gold split cards are only possible if: Theres 45, not 50 cards in monocolor (which would requires 5 gold cards before Advent of Wurm) OR theres 5 uncommon artifacts (which would requires 5 cards after Wear) OR theres actually only 5 uncommon splits. All those are highly unlikely which makes people believe this is actually DMG correct skeleton.
    Posted in: Speculation
  • 1

    posted a message on [[M14]] Shadowborn Demon
    Zombies shell with Gravecrawlers...
    Posted in: The Rumor Mill
  • 2

    posted a message on Sugar Bailout
    Quote from Senori

    Sure. But in exchange for that the taxpayers get a lot of other benefits which are harder to summarize, like price stability and certain minimums for government use.


    Price stability ? This doesn't make any sense when the government use people's own money to stabilize it. Price oscillations will be contained but people already paid for the higher prices by loaning their money !

    the private market can deal with a version of the problem, but not in the way the government wants because the government has different objectives than a private insurer does. The banking system doesn't care if the industry is dominated by a handful of large producers or not, while the government does. So the banking sector doesn't need to structure the loans in such a way as to provide a floor for small operators.


    If certain industries have a cost structure that only big producers can prevail, there isn't a reason to believe society should force small producers in that field.
    A handful of large producers are not necessarily a bad thing as long as they behave in a competitive manner. Since commodity demands are inelastic, those people won't be able to raise their markups anyway.
    Also I don't think small operators runs so much risks to a point they would simply vanish without government loans. Maybe only the really small or the really inefficient ones.

    Because consumers are a very poor judge of uncertain consequences.

    And the government is a better analyst of people's own interests ?
    I'm pretty sure people have a better idea about their preferences then anyone else does.

    Workers are hostages now?


    Lobbyist oftentimes evoke the argument that government should keep helping then with cheap loans or subsidies or else they will bankrupt and raise unemployment. They use their employees as hostages to negotiate.
    Posted in: Debate
  • 1

    posted a message on White, black, and red
    * Darkened Hearth: not sure why this wedge want to sac creatures for mana. This is really far from W.

    * Victory Syphon: Pretty fair and cool. I like it.

    * Repetitive Emotions: Feels a bit clunky word wise but i like the design. It is a nice enchant for the likes of Master Healer and Prodigal Pyromancer (in limited).

    * Nihilistic Spiritualist: the first ability should specify creatures and pw, since those are the only kind of permanents that takes damage. The wording on the second ability should be "put three 1/1 white Spirit creature tokens with flying onto the battlefield with "this creature attack each turn if able"".
    I like the dsign but the spirirt tokens should also be red since they have a typically red draw back.

    * Dragon Reincarnation Cycle: extremely cute, my fav of yours !!!

    * Barath the Unmaker: Not sure if i like this one.
    His first 2 abilities feels totally black and not a wedge at all. The first one is quite narrow and requires some sort of mill or the second one to work. When the order of abilities to be used are determined by the mechanics alone, i think the PW has design issues.
    The third ability is quite nice and totally fit the colors, except it doesn't have any synergy with the first 2. It's actually quite strange since he is destroying your opponent's creatures and building a army for you...

    * Shade of Remorse: one of the best WB guys ever. Totally master piece !

    * Bitter End: why not "destroy target creature. ~~ deals damage to target creature's controller equal to that creature toughness'" ? It's a uncommon power in my opinion.

    * Life of War: narrow and weird. You have to spend mana, life and hope for a enemy creature on the field in order to get tokens out of it.
    Posted in: Custom Card Creation
  • 1

    posted a message on Costco back in the forefront of minimum wage debate
    It's a monopoly tactic. Minimal Wages equates to higher operational costs for the producers. Every company looses by paying a higher minimal wage.
    But smaller business might bankrupt or simply not join the market, helping the bigger companies to maintain or increase it's market share. Eventually a minimal wage might give so much share to the bigger companies that it's simply worth it.

    Some of the biggest companies in Brazil aggressively lobby for higher minimal wages. It's a guarantee that only then can produce because only then can pay those wages (this is prevalent in the industry sector). I know it because I've worked there.
    Posted in: Debate
  • 1

    posted a message on What is the Flavor of Phyrexian Mana?
    Phyrexian mana adds two things, mechanically.

    Mechanic: Pay life to cast spells instead of mana. Flavor: Phyrexians can extract energy from living things (destroying then in the process) as showed in the concepts of Phyrexian Lens and Phyrexian Altar. The PW do it to himself in order to generate energy for the spell instead of using a landbond.

    Mechanic: Cast spell of colors you can't produce mana. Flavor: In magic, artificial things can be conjured by any kind of mana and they can simulate what any kind of spell can do. A Mono Green PW can grab a Disruptive Scepter and do something akin to black mind magic. Phyrexian spells represents phyrexian artificial nature by allowing the PW to cast a spell outside the colors of his land bounds, the very same thing artifacts do.

    I like phyrexian mana a lot from a flavor stand point. The PW that learns with phyrexian behaves like a artificer, simulating many effects he can't do without artificial magic. But instead of well engineered power plants (see how artifact decks such as tron use a mana rock artifact to ramp to a bigger mana rocks which is used to ramp into even bigger mana rocks or untap artifacts) he sacrifices his own health.
    Posted in: Magic Storyline
  • 1

    posted a message on Socialism is Bad
    Quote from Tuss
    It's "marxists", by the way.

    Quote from italofoca
    All I'm asking is "what is this thing that stops people from going cooperative ?"


    The destruction of class consciousness and the lack of leftist movements.

    Quote from italofoca
    I know the upper class might have interests in stoping it but what are they really doing to stop it ? Can you prove they are doing it ?


    Union busting. The persecution of communists. The violent suppression of protesters like OWS. The dismantling of safety nets, leaving people ever more dependant upon their employer.


    The persecution of communists happen not because they discovered a superior way of productive organization, but because they political agenda evolves inflicting people's property rights at mass scale.

    If cooperatives invariably requires a social movements that eliminates private property for everyone outside the movement, it's a already a horrible form of organization. A good form of organization would naturally spawn (like capitalistic enterprises did) and prove itself better then the current forms.
    I know historically accepted rights play a huge role in this and establishing new rights might involve some fighting and the destruction of previews accepted rights. Still, some rational discussion over which set of rights leads to the better outcome is needed. I'm pretty sure society would be a lot more open minded to real left-wing ideas if left-wing scientists could prove their revolution will improve people's standard of leaving. You're asking us to leave millennial institution (free-trade and private property), one that proved to be source of prosperity for many, to adopt a new way of production that is not even proved it's a better way.

    The dismantle of safety nets occur when people realize the government is manipulating a big part of the economy's outcome. When high standard of living is reached by the majority of people in certain areas, safety nets loose it's appeal as people can pay for their own education, health, security, etc.
    People will ways choose to have choices, they choose a providing government that cut their choices only when the private choice is not possible because they simply don't have money.
    Posted in: Debate
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.