I felt like I had a very weak day 1. Other than that, can anyone give me some criticism or helpful advice? This was my first full game, and I feel like I made some decent strides in learning the game.
If the game had swung the other way, I would've given you Town MVP.
I'd say he deserves it anyway. Some mods give out MVP's for each team...
MTG~DDS, you played very well. You were considered clear town by most in midgame and that earned you the hammer. Plus you nailed the scum team.
Likewise, you stayed off my radar most of the game. Not sure if the patterns that led to my final case on Swishh/MRH(Taredas) were legit, but it did get me to the right scumteam. I just wasn't confident enough in my game knowledge/skills to push it. Good game!
I felt like I had a very weak day 1. Other than that, can anyone give me some criticism or helpful advice? This was my first full game, and I feel like I made some decent strides in learning the game.
Well, I guess this is my vote. I have reread everything 3 more times in the last 3 days. Don't feel like I am making any more progress or having any epiphanies. This is what my gut is telling me. I'll go over more of my thought process tomorrow (or post-game, whichever occurs).
I will be placing a vote today. I openly admit I feel a little overwhelmed with this decision. If I choose incorrectly, I hope the town forgives me and won't hold it against me in future games. Anyone have any final input?
This will be a dumbing down (putting thoughts into words)...some stating the obvious. Votes are (2) Swishh and (2) Taredas. One is town, one is scum. If not, scum would already have a win right now. Which means two scum are voting together as are the other two townies.
Scumteam possibilities are therefore:
Swishh/Nyxu or Taredas/Cantrip. Any other combination would have already resulted in town loss, even without my vote. Is any of this logic flawed?
Anyone can answer this.
I'll be working through more reread, putting my thoughts into notes, and post more in a bit. I'll not hold this game up too much longer, but I also don't want to rush.
A)There is a large conversation between swishh and cantrip. Are you saying that your content directly applies to the conversation?
And do not profess to know my motives in any way shape or form. B) There was a deadline extension. Two people had not posted since the extension was brought up. I have immediate suspicions towards anyone who does not immediately take advantage of a chance to further discuss matters, especially in lylo.
So instead of demanding I start casing people (fun fact not everybody finds naiposting and pbpas to be the most effective) why don't you look at what is being discussed and offer input. Like about swishh posting the wg postmortem, the difference between my response to it and taredas, and cantripmancers. Taredas' apparent reluctance to respond to my question.
Or, you can continue to run the clock like taredas is.
A) You are correct, it does not. As to motives, I have no clue what your motives are, I can only guess as you have not stated.
B) This goes back to what I was trying to get out of you. If you are onto something enlighten me. Otherwise, I will have to go off my own reads. I am following up on Swishh's posting/case now.
*I'm not 100% on terms "naiposting" and "pbpas" but I assume that is the style post I have been making? Could you throw out a quick definition if I'm wrong?
You are absolutely right though. I know everyone is different, but I like to see where references or accusations come from. That way I can see for myself and/or determine if it is out of context. @underlined: noted.
Involved? I have given my reads today. I cased why how I arrived at my reads today. I have also posted more content than anyone else has today.
Oh, My apologies. I guess that means you're excused from the game for the rest of the Day.
Not at all. Point was, I have actually given input today, you haven't. Yet you still throwdown an accusation of 'not involved' at me. What is your excuse for not contributing anything worthwhile today?
Involved? I have given my reads today. I cased why how I arrived at my reads today. I have also posted more content than anyone else has today. You have posted less than a complete paragraph all combined today. Why don't you do some scumhunting legwork and not depend on others...why don't you get involved?
More convenient to ignore me asking you for input...easier to ask others than do it yourself?
Awesome! Thanks Arn! Thanks to Void for mentoring also!
Likewise, you stayed off my radar most of the game. Not sure if the patterns that led to my final case on Swishh/MRH(Taredas) were legit, but it did get me to the right scumteam. I just wasn't confident enough in my game knowledge/skills to push it. Good game!
All good...we both tunneled on each other. I had a weak day 1.
Fun game Arn!
Vote Taredas
Swishh: votes Taredas
Taredas: votes Swishh
Cantrip: votes Swishh
Nyxu: votes Taredas
This will be a dumbing down (putting thoughts into words)...some stating the obvious. Votes are (2) Swishh and (2) Taredas. One is town, one is scum. If not, scum would already have a win right now. Which means two scum are voting together as are the other two townies.
Scumteam possibilities are therefore:
Swishh/Nyxu or Taredas/Cantrip. Any other combination would have already resulted in town loss, even without my vote. Is any of this logic flawed?
Anyone can answer this.
I'll be working through more reread, putting my thoughts into notes, and post more in a bit. I'll not hold this game up too much longer, but I also don't want to rush.
I will have a decision soon.
Thanks
A light turned on...
A) You are correct, it does not. As to motives, I have no clue what your motives are, I can only guess as you have not stated.
B) This goes back to what I was trying to get out of you. If you are onto something enlighten me. Otherwise, I will have to go off my own reads. I am following up on Swishh's posting/case now.
*I'm not 100% on terms "naiposting" and "pbpas" but I assume that is the style post I have been making? Could you throw out a quick definition if I'm wrong?
You are absolutely right though. I know everyone is different, but I like to see where references or accusations come from. That way I can see for myself and/or determine if it is out of context. @underlined: noted.
Thanks.
Not at all. Point was, I have actually given input today, you haven't. Yet you still throwdown an accusation of 'not involved' at me. What is your excuse for not contributing anything worthwhile today?
Why snip half of my quote?
More convenient to ignore me asking you for input...easier to ask others than do it yourself?