I'm wondering if a deck based around Black Vise and the like is vintage playable. I know that turn 1 Lotus, land, 4x Vise is pretty dangerous. But is it enough to build a vintage deck around? Or is this already an existing archetype?
Just wondering.
-BPC
Please take the time to add more content to your thread starters. Asking about a single card is legitimate, but please provide some of your own analysis. Just stating that a statistical anomaly could conceivably be "dangerous" is not sufficient, and requesting a decklist is in violation of vintage forum rules. No further action will be taken on this post due to how drastic and recent the new vintage policies are, but for future reference, posts in the vintage forums will necessitate some analysis and direct the intended conversation. Threads are for the purpose of developing the metagame and our understanding of the metagame, and a poor OP will lead to a poor discussion.
Hey kids! Don't like rules? Tired of having your lulz censored by terrible, terrible people called "moderators"? Big fan of metal? Check out Metaln☺☺☺☺! This is probably the worst possible forum to advertise it on!
Added bonus: we're holding a songwriting contest in march with a registry drive going on right now! Check it out, plus the opportunity to earn $50!
The closest deck you'd want would a a stax variant (mishra's workshop to 3 black vises is a lot more reliable than lotus to 3 black vises). Stax also has numerous cards that make casting spells difficult -- sphere of resistance, trinisphere, thorn of amethysts, so that the opponent can't get rid of the cards in his hand.
However, as far a kill conditions go, 4 black vises isn't nearly fast enough, even if you can plop them down on turn 1. You'd rather, say, play a trinisphere on turn 1 than 3 black vises. That way, it will help prevent you from suddenly dying should your opponent have some method of comboing on turn 1. Once control has been established, stax will generally want kill conditions that will kill faster than the measly 3 damage per turn that a black vise can deal. juggernaut, for example, swings in for 5, and painter's servant + grindstone can deplete the library in 1 turn.
I tried black vise in an interesting deck I made right after it got unrestricted. If you run it in a deck with 4 howling mines and something like 20 to 24 bolts+fireblasts with other supplemental/useful burn, it can be quite deadly. However, it's best as a sort of metagame deck. If you're full of gush variants, it's actually quite deadly, provided you can resolve the vise t1 or t2. Other than that, It's just a variant of howling burn that does alright in a relatively unpowered meta. I did do well vs. some powered decks, but if they can empty their hand, you're better off boarding it out for something like smash to smithereens or other, more useful hate. (I'm finding pyrostatic pillar maindeck quite hilarious, for instance). I'm sure many of the more experienced vintage players would disagree, though, so take my suggestions with a grain of salt.
This post seems fine to me, got legit replies , asked legit questions, seemed to have a clear direction...when asking a question, an announcement of your own analysis is never necessary and shouldn't be imposed. Besides, what more can be said about that particular card combination other than its a "statistical anomaly", which was obviously implied anyway.
I know we all have to abide by the rules, but honestly, the vast majority of them seem ridiculous and unnecessary.
There was no offensive or abusive language, leave it alone. Vague posts have a tendency to be ignored anyway
This is not the place to discuss a warning given by a mod. If you have a problem with a moderator's warning, the place to discuss it is either on that moderator's help desk thread or through PM.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I am no longer on MTGS staff, so please don't contact me asking me to do staff things. :|
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Just wondering.
-BPC
Please take the time to add more content to your thread starters. Asking about a single card is legitimate, but please provide some of your own analysis. Just stating that a statistical anomaly could conceivably be "dangerous" is not sufficient, and requesting a decklist is in violation of vintage forum rules. No further action will be taken on this post due to how drastic and recent the new vintage policies are, but for future reference, posts in the vintage forums will necessitate some analysis and direct the intended conversation. Threads are for the purpose of developing the metagame and our understanding of the metagame, and a poor OP will lead to a poor discussion.
Added bonus: we're holding a songwriting contest in march with a registry drive going on right now! Check it out, plus the opportunity to earn $50!
However, as far a kill conditions go, 4 black vises isn't nearly fast enough, even if you can plop them down on turn 1. You'd rather, say, play a trinisphere on turn 1 than 3 black vises. That way, it will help prevent you from suddenly dying should your opponent have some method of comboing on turn 1. Once control has been established, stax will generally want kill conditions that will kill faster than the measly 3 damage per turn that a black vise can deal. juggernaut, for example, swings in for 5, and painter's servant + grindstone can deplete the library in 1 turn.
edit: mill->grind; thanks thefreakaccident
"Sometimes, the situation is outracing a threat, sometimes it's ignoring it, and sometimes it involves sideboarding in 4x Hope//Pray." --Doug Linn
--welt
Credit to DolZero for this awesome sig!
ARE YOU GAY?
This post seems fine to me, got legit replies , asked legit questions, seemed to have a clear direction...when asking a question, an announcement of your own analysis is never necessary and shouldn't be imposed. Besides, what more can be said about that particular card combination other than its a "statistical anomaly", which was obviously implied anyway.
I know we all have to abide by the rules, but honestly, the vast majority of them seem ridiculous and unnecessary.
There was no offensive or abusive language, leave it alone. Vague posts have a tendency to be ignored anyway