MTG Salvation

This card seems decent, and moreover, this presumably means that the entire cycle will be completed quickly. I think I'd give this the nod over Stirring Wildwood, but I'm not in the position to have to choose currently. This plays pretty nicely into a GW go-wide theme, and I think it'll probably stick around for a while for me.

I think I still like this less than Horizon canopy for the cycle of "extra" lands I run in mu cube, but the llama "hidden" in the normal art is absolutely *chef's kiss*

YES, THE REST OF THE MANLAND CYCLE!!! I say that, but the only ones from the OG cycle that I can realistically see getting powercrept are Lavaclaw Reaches and this card's predecessor, Stirring Wildwood. I think I prefer Wildwood's floor to Restless Prairie's ceiling, but man oh man is it a beating in the right circumstances.

I like the ceiling that this can represent over Wildwood enough that I'll probably test it in its place. Plus, the llama hidden in the regular art is amazing. I like shoehorning in extra support for the tokens/anthems theme without having to dedicate actual slots to making it work.

This is better than wildwood pretty sure but it’s just driving home for me how much of a buzzkill the “no trigger multi stacking” tempalting is

Neat, this one can finish a lot of games on one activation. So excited to see the rest of the cycle.

I'm convinced the aggressive color pairs would appreciate +1 manland over another guild card as they have a higher fixing land requirement over midrange/ control decks.

I guess I'm in the minority here. I think there's a massive difference between lands that activate for 3 mana vs 4.

Do I think it's better than Stirring Wildwood? No. Will I probably replace it anyways because llama? Yeah, probably.

Quote from guyincorporated »

I guess I'm in the minority here. I think there's a massive difference between lands that activate for 3 mana vs 4.

Do I think it's better than Stirring Wildwood? No. Will I probably replace it anyways because llama? Yeah, probably.

I could see that but I've found that good anthems are difficult to come by in Vintage/ Legacy environments and I would give it to this over Stirring Wildwoods.

I like this over wildwood. Threatens way more damage and you usually have better things to do than attack with manlands at 4 mana anyways.

5 to activate including itself is too much of aggro. Will pass unless super easy to acquire.

Quote from JinxedIdol »

5 to activate including itself is too much of aggro. Will pass unless super easy to acquire.

I activate Raging Ravine all the time in creature decks and this card can put even more work in for finishing a game. Obviously ravine is better on an empty board but this card can just up and end the game adding damage equivalent to a Hellrider style effect.

Quote from guyincorporated »

I guess I'm in the minority here. I think there's a massive difference between lands that activate for 3 mana vs 4.

Do I think it's better than Stirring Wildwood? No. Will I probably replace it anyways because llama? Yeah, probably.

I've found the 3/3 body AND +1 activation cost to be problematic and I've opted for the 3/4 Stirring Wildwood. But IMO these two are fairly close compared to the other choices, so I wouldn't blame anyone for picking either.