I Think the less useful creatures are either metamorph and noxious,
from both i think the noxious is the worst because you will have matches that does not require removal
Would cut 2 noxious gearhulk
I would also cut gearhulk. I would probably even completely cut it and run something else in the last slot. Wurmcoil is just so much better, and you don't want too many high end cards.
Metamorph is somewhat questionable, but I like multiple lodestone golems.
This Gearhulk show a nice piece in tests, Its a removal+life gain a beater with evasion .. i dont want to cut it completely, but i down 1 off and 1 discard.
Metamorph is a joker, i dont want to cut it too hahah. Many time i played A lodestone on T3 and copy it .. i'n so far ahead
2 Stubborn
or 1 Stuborn 1 Push
depending on number of creatures in expected metagame
maybe 2 Thoughtseize if you really expect a lot of aggro
these all go bad with Lodestone Golem and counterspell is not for this decks playstyle
You rly think Stubborn dont fit in this ? My meta is mix of junds, valakut's, UW's some tokens ... Stubborn was an spell i find to try to keep away the worst trheat like Liliana's, scapeshift .. you know !?
i was thinking about Serum Vision in the deck ... how do you see it ?!
Yea Stubborn doesnt have great synergy with the deck because
To enable its beast mode you need your payoff cards which require enablers or time. So its inefficient
Thats not a draw-go deck, its full of sorcery speed spells so often you will tap out and unable to use Stubborn. Or wait on your threats to be able to cast it and pray your opp play a high-impact spell. Lose/lose situation.
Lodestone Golem makes it cost more
1 copy is ok I think
You have a lot of discard, I think Liliana shouldnt be such a fatal threat
For Scapeshift you also have discard so its kinda ok, Id bring more counterspells from sideboard
UW Control doesnt care about Stubborn imo
Serum Visions can be ok because its kinda a combo deck, when you have enablers you want to find payoff and vice versa also your t1 slot is not overpopulated
I think 2 might be ok
Noxious Gearhulk seems to be lowest power, Id replace them with Wurmcoils and maybe cut whats left though I didnt play this deck and dont know how much high-end it requires
Good explanation about it
maybe i was hype by myself in this card. I guess i need to pay active and let the opponent worry and dont play reactive, discards should make this work.
Noxious Gearhulk maybe my pet card haha, but i dont think its too slow, its bring me back to many game cause he is a remove + lifegain. I played with 2off
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I have this list and must to cut 2 cards and I can not decide this 2. Other tips are welcome.
3 Thoughtseize
3 Stubborn Denial
4 Fatal Push
4 Grand Architect
4 Myr Superion
4 Lodestone Golem
2 Hostage Taker
3 Phyrexian Metamorph
3 Wurmcoil Engine
3 Noxious Gearhulk
All tips are welcome. Tks all
from both i think the noxious is the worst because you will have matches that does not require removal
Would cut 2 noxious gearhulk
Metamorph is somewhat questionable, but I like multiple lodestone golems.
Metamorph is a joker, i dont want to cut it too hahah. Many time i played A lodestone on T3 and copy it .. i'n so far ahead
or 1 Stuborn 1 Push
depending on number of creatures in expected metagame
maybe 2 Thoughtseize if you really expect a lot of aggro
these all go bad with Lodestone Golem and counterspell is not for this decks playstyle
G Green Stompy
RG Shamans
UB Mill
UG Infect
WUBRG Slivers!
You rly think Stubborn dont fit in this ? My meta is mix of junds, valakut's, UW's some tokens ... Stubborn was an spell i find to try to keep away the worst trheat like Liliana's, scapeshift .. you know !?
i was thinking about Serum Vision in the deck ... how do you see it ?!
To enable its beast mode you need your payoff cards which require enablers or time. So its inefficient
Thats not a draw-go deck, its full of sorcery speed spells so often you will tap out and unable to use Stubborn. Or wait on your threats to be able to cast it and pray your opp play a high-impact spell. Lose/lose situation.
Lodestone Golem makes it cost more
1 copy is ok I think
You have a lot of discard, I think Liliana shouldnt be such a fatal threat
For Scapeshift you also have discard so its kinda ok, Id bring more counterspells from sideboard
UW Control doesnt care about Stubborn imo
Serum Visions can be ok because its kinda a combo deck, when you have enablers you want to find payoff and vice versa also your t1 slot is not overpopulated
I think 2 might be ok
Noxious Gearhulk seems to be lowest power, Id replace them with Wurmcoils and maybe cut whats left though I didnt play this deck and dont know how much high-end it requires
G Green Stompy
RG Shamans
UB Mill
UG Infect
WUBRG Slivers!
maybe i was hype by myself in this card. I guess i need to pay active and let the opponent worry and dont play reactive, discards should make this work.
My doubt now is ..
1. Serum Vision to fix the early
2. tutors like Treasure Mage and/or Sphinx Summoner to get "big bosses" ?
Noxious Gearhulk maybe my pet card haha, but i dont think its too slow, its bring me back to many game cause he is a remove + lifegain. I played with 2off