Which seems a little off. B only shows up once, while U shows up three times. These could be three color decks again, which would then probably go down:
Which seems a little off. B only shows up once, while U shows up three times. These could be three color decks again, which would then probably go down:
Then again, they may not make them all 3 color either. There may be a mix of 3 color and 2 color decks. I feel the initial pairing of colors makes sense for the theme, but part of the issue is that it's a 3-2 split between ally (RB, WU, GW) and enemy pairs (UR, UG), and that blue gets repeated 3 times - yet makes the most sense in each of those themes. Like, you're not going to say that any of those 3 doesn't have blue in it.
I'd initially almost put Ruthless Regiment as RW due to 'Regiment,' then realized I'd left out black entirely, and that 'Ruthless' really does lean towards RB, or possibly WB. When I went for upping to 3 colors, I realized I had overdone White again, but green could fit in with ruthless hordes, maybe? Anyways. WRB does make more sense.
I'd still be more inclined towards WUR for the Arcane deck, just because of storm, arcane, and prowess style mechanics, and because of commanders like Shu Yun, etc. They definitely like putting that kind of mechanic synergy into white (Monastery Mentor...) - but green can fit as well, with Commanders like Riku of two reflections, - or it might be more literal, leaning into Maelstrom Wanderer and more of a Cascade theme instead. Which... now seems more likely.
This is the conclusion I came to as well. I feel pretty confident about regiment, maelstrom, and wisdom...less sure about swarm and evolution, but the pattern seems likely to dictate that they're also correct.
Keep in mind they only stopped doing color cycles when they switched to 4 decks. Now that they're back to 5 decks, it's pretty likely that they'll resume doing cycles, making a mix of 2-3 color decks much less likely.
Keep in mind they only stopped doing color cycles when they switched to 4 decks. Now that they're back to 5 decks, it's pretty likely that they'll resume doing cycles, making a mix of 2-3 color decks much less likely.
Well since 2017, they have done:
1 bant (2018), 1 esper (2018),1 grixis (2017), 1 naya (2019), 1 jund (2018)
1 mardu (2017), 1 jeskai (2019), 1 sultai (2019)
We "need" a temur and abzan to complete the cycle
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
How i feel about competitive players and casual players in EDH: The competitive are german tourists, the casual are italian tourists, both in a italian beach. The italians asking themselves "why are the germans here?" make a legitimate question, the answer is because the beach is beautiful, no matter the country you came from. The italians wanting to ban the germans are dumb, because if the germans pay for their stay and follow the rules like everyone else, they have the right to be in the beach. Hovewer, if the germans started to ask themselves "why are the italians here?"... they would be dumb as hell.
I have to whistle blow people saying jeskai and sultai
Those two color combos won’t happen
We got both of those color combos last year hard to believe they would do it twice in a row
Personally I want to remind that 4-color decks and probably a 5-color deck is not out of the equation
Apparently, there's going to be 4 Foil Commanders in each deck. The last time they did that was in 2016, 4 color decks with Partners. We might be getting Partners again, maybe even 4 Color decks.
I have to whistle blow people saying jeskai and sultai
Those two color combos won’t happen
We got both of those color combos last year hard to believe they would do it twice in a row
Personally I want to remind that 4-color decks and probably a 5-color deck is not out of the equation
Apparently, there's going to be 4 Foil Commanders in each deck. The last time they did that was in 2016, 4 color decks with Partners. We might be getting Partners again, maybe even 4 Color decks.
Exactly
3 partners 1 main legend they are doing it again probably
Plus last time it was 2 enemy and 1 ally of color combos in partner they might reverse it for this one
2 ally 1 enemy
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
EDH: RWB Edgar Markov The current updated decklist is here
EDH: WUB Oloro, Ageless ascetic The current updated decklist is here
EDH: UWG Phelddagrif, The current updated decklist is here
EDH: WUB Yennett, Cryptic Sovereign The current updated decklist is here
EDH: WUB Alela, Artful provocateur The current updated decklist is here
EDH: GB Hapatra, vizier of poisons The current updated decklist is here
Ruthless Regiment - RB
Arcane Maelstrom - RU
Symbiotic Swarm - GW
Timeless Wisdom - UW
Enhanced evolution - UG
Which seems a little off. B only shows up once, while U shows up three times. These could be three color decks again, which would then probably go down:
Ruthless Regiment - RBG
Arcane Maelstrom - RUW
Symbiotic Swarm - GWB
Timeless Wisdom - UWR
Enhanced evolution - UGB
Retired EDH - Tibor and Lumia | [PR]Nemata |Ramirez dePietro | [C]Edric | Riku | Jenara | Lazav | Heliod | Daxos | Roon | Kozilek
I dont think they would do 4 wedges and 1 shard; Ruthless Regiment is probably RWB
I considered that, but that would put W four times. They have done 3-2 splits of cycles in sets before. I can see them doing a 3-2 split here.
Oh hey. I put WRU twice! Well THAT's clearly not right. Let's try this again:
Ruthless Regiment - RBW
Arcane Maelstrom - RU +G?
Symbiotic Swarm - GWB
Timeless Wisdom - UWR
Enhanced evolution - UGB
Then again, they may not make them all 3 color either. There may be a mix of 3 color and 2 color decks. I feel the initial pairing of colors makes sense for the theme, but part of the issue is that it's a 3-2 split between ally (RB, WU, GW) and enemy pairs (UR, UG), and that blue gets repeated 3 times - yet makes the most sense in each of those themes. Like, you're not going to say that any of those 3 doesn't have blue in it.
I'd initially almost put Ruthless Regiment as RW due to 'Regiment,' then realized I'd left out black entirely, and that 'Ruthless' really does lean towards RB, or possibly WB. When I went for upping to 3 colors, I realized I had overdone White again, but green could fit in with ruthless hordes, maybe? Anyways. WRB does make more sense.
I'd still be more inclined towards WUR for the Arcane deck, just because of storm, arcane, and prowess style mechanics, and because of commanders like Shu Yun, etc. They definitely like putting that kind of mechanic synergy into white (Monastery Mentor...) - but green can fit as well, with Commanders like Riku of two reflections, - or it might be more literal, leaning into Maelstrom Wanderer and more of a Cascade theme instead. Which... now seems more likely.
Retired EDH - Tibor and Lumia | [PR]Nemata |Ramirez dePietro | [C]Edric | Riku | Jenara | Lazav | Heliod | Daxos | Roon | Kozilek
This is the conclusion I came to as well. I feel pretty confident about regiment, maelstrom, and wisdom...less sure about swarm and evolution, but the pattern seems likely to dictate that they're also correct.
Keep in mind they only stopped doing color cycles when they switched to 4 decks. Now that they're back to 5 decks, it's pretty likely that they'll resume doing cycles, making a mix of 2-3 color decks much less likely.
EDH Primers
Phelddagrif - Zirilan
EDH
Thrasios+Bruse - Pang - Sasaya - Wydwen - Feather - Rona - Toshiro - Sylvia+Khorvath - Geth - QMarchesa - Firesong - Athreos - Arixmethes - Isperia - Etali - Silas+Sidar - Saskia - Virtus+Gorm - Kynaios - Naban - Aryel - Mizzix - Kazuul - Tymna+Kraum - Sidar+Tymna - Ayli - Gwendlyn - Phelddagrif 4 - Liliana - Kaervek - Phelddagrif 3 - Mairsil - Scarab - Child - Phenax - Shirei - Thada - Depala - Circu - Kytheon - GrenzoHR - Phelddagrif - Reyhan+Kraum - Toshiro - Varolz - Nin - Ojutai - Tasigur - Zedruu - Uril - Edric - Wort - Zurgo - Nahiri - Grenzo - Kozilek - Yisan - Ink-Treader - Yisan - Brago - Sidisi - Toshiro - Alexi - Sygg - Brimaz - Sek'Kuar - Marchesa - Vish Kal - Iroas - Phelddagrif - Ephara - Derevi - Glissa - Wanderer - Saffi - Melek - Xiahou Dun - Lazav - Lin Sivvi - Zirilan - Glissa
PDH - Drake - Graverobber - Izzet GM - Tallowisp - Symbiote Brawl - Feather - Ugin - Jace - Scarab - Angrath - Vraska - Kumena Oathbreaker - Wrenn&6
Well since 2017, they have done:
1 bant (2018), 1 esper (2018),1 grixis (2017), 1 naya (2019), 1 jund (2018)
1 mardu (2017), 1 jeskai (2019), 1 sultai (2019)
We "need" a temur and abzan to complete the cycle
Those two color combos won’t happen
We got both of those color combos last year hard to believe they would do it twice in a row
Personally I want to remind that 4-color decks and probably a 5-color deck is not out of the equation
Apparently, there's going to be 4 Foil Commanders in each deck. The last time they did that was in 2016, 4 color decks with Partners. We might be getting Partners again, maybe even 4 Color decks.
Exactly
3 partners 1 main legend they are doing it again probably
Plus last time it was 2 enemy and 1 ally of color combos in partner they might reverse it for this one
2 ally 1 enemy