Is Reiterate on Shahrazad so you have six subgames to play a *******'ish way to win a game. No one really wants to play it out and it causes a mass scoop.
Hmm.. I voted no in the poll then read the post. '
Playing a single Shahrazard really is dumb. it just takes too long in multiplayer EDH. Its just a terrible way to win.
However, making 6, is a different story. There is NO WAY any1 would EVER play 6 multiplayer games of EDH out, so its an instant win.
I guess it depends on whether your playgroup recognizes a ton of copies as instant win. however, i'dd definetly target some1 with a shahrazard in their deck, because its TERRIBLE thing to do to a game
Thanks to DarkNightCavalier at Scuttlemutt Productions for the awesome sig.
Currently playing:
EDH
:symw::symu::symb::symr::symg:Pro-Everthing-Genitus
Playing a single Shahrazard really is dumb. it just takes too long in multiplayer EDH. Its just a terrible way to win.
However, making 6, is a different story. There is NO WAY any1 would EVER play 6 multiplayer games of EDH out, so its an instant win.
I guess it depends on whether your playgroup recognizes a ton of copies as instant win. however, i'dd definetly target some1 with a shahrazard in their deck, because its TERRIBLE thing to do to a game
Thanks to Spiderboy4 of High~Light Studios!