MTG Salvation

Quote from SyrixLoremaster »

Or you can just ignore the back. There are Commander players who build a deck and ignore one or more colors.

903.4 The Commander variant uses color identity to determine what cards can be in a deck with a certain commander. The color identity of a card is the color or colors of any mana symbols in that card’s mana cost or rules text, plus any colors defined by its characteristic-defining abilities (see rule 604.3) or color indicator (see rule 204).

903.4c The back face of a double-faced card (see rule 711) is included when determining a card’s color identity. This is an exception to rule 711.4a.

903.5c A card can be included in a Commander deck only if every color in its color identity is also found in the color identity of the deck’s commander.

Thanks for playing.

Edit - clarification: If you were suggesting using as a commander, sure you are correct but Xcric was referring to its use in the 99. A monocolored White EDH deck cant use this "amazing white card" so it falls flat.

Quote from Xcric »

Lets not go patting them on the back just yet over mila.

Shes good, but most people griping over a lack of white card draw are edh players.

This is forced into red/white/x builds.

It doesnt solve the problem.

Its a fine start, but it doesnt do much to alleviate that issue in that format