Many of the DLP regulars play here, but they only post signups in their own forum once in a blue moon and their forum software is... maybe worse than Curse for mafia, truth to tell
It's hard to think of a forum software less suited for mafia than DLP's, especially in recent years.
And I've played in 2+2.
How many active players does MC have, how many games running, does either MU or MC have a tools edge?
Also, it sounds like MC is gradually shrinking as well? Do they have a recruitment or growth strategy?
MU's gathering of refugees from across the internet has been a pretty successful plan, that seems like a strong bet for long term viability. I'd rather move once, not twice, as any and every move is going to result in casualties.
This is essentially my opinion, yes.
I would say MC and MU have similar tools, with MU having just the slightest bit of an edge in terms of user friendliness.
Alternatively, if the MC folks are declining also, would they be interested in leaving together with us, so that we can form a stronger bulwark against contrasting playstyles and meta?
I don't get the eaten up argument, honestly. Specially if we get like a small subsection (which was my understanding?).
But I've played at MC, and loud eye-hurty themes aside, it's pretty neat.
My concern with MC (and maybe someone else can talk here) is that I worry we'll end up having this same discussion there in a few months. Aren't they having the same issues filling up games/getting people? @Osie
No. No popcorn. Let's stay on topic and not feed trolls.
The vast majority is voting to go, while the second highest (at almost 50% less than the first) says that it's probably time but aren't quite ready.
With 16 votes, are we waiting on a lot of players? Seems like if all the regulars we have were to show up and vote any other option but "head elsewhere", "head elsewhere" would still be in the lead by a wide margin.
Should we shift the focus of the conversation, then, to where we're going, instead of if?
I voted to move. We always waffle on it, might as well move forward. No matter what we'll still be the same group of people so who cares where we do it.
And I've played in 2+2.
I would say MC and MU have similar tools, with MU having just the slightest bit of an edge in terms of user friendliness.
I like this.
But I've played at MC, and loud eye-hurty themes aside, it's pretty neat.
My concern with MC (and maybe someone else can talk here) is that I worry we'll end up having this same discussion there in a few months. Aren't they having the same issues filling up games/getting people?
@Osie
It's why I'm advocating to move the conversation past the "if" stage and officially to "where".
The vast majority is voting to go, while the second highest (at almost 50% less than the first) says that it's probably time but aren't quite ready.
With 16 votes, are we waiting on a lot of players? Seems like if all the regulars we have were to show up and vote any other option but "head elsewhere", "head elsewhere" would still be in the lead by a wide margin.
Should we shift the focus of the conversation, then, to where we're going, instead of if?