lol there's really not anything valid to complain about re: TWD, what're you on about? Disaster nothing this secret lair is HYPE.
My biggest gripe about losing the 'Banned as Commander' list was that the list was ALREADY IN PLACE and it wasn't hurting anyone. Meanwhile it gave folks who wanted to play specific edge-case legendaries a chance to play them. It was only a positive thing. And then it got taken away for no legitimate reason, and the rationale given at the time boiled down to 'y'all are too dumb to remember two lists.'
I wouldn't have minded if there had never been a list in the first place. Really I wouldn't. But they made it, and it was a good thing, and they took it away while telling us all we're stupid.
****. That.
Banning Lutri is whatever, I wish I got to play with his adorable little otter ass and its sad that he'll never see play anywhere in spite of being so cute, but at least we never really HAD him before losing him.
I definitely agree that making an entirely new category for Lutri probably isn't worth the effort.
'Banned as Commander,' however, was absolutely kiboshed explicitly because they didn't think people were smart enough to remember two lists, so forgive me if I'm insulted and suspicious when a committee of knuckle-dragging morons try to tell me something is for the best lol
Because banned as companion was 'too complex' which is a complete underestimation of the intelligence of the average player.
When the average player figures out deodorant I'll have more faith in bans like that.
On one hand, 'Banned as Commander' and 'Banned as Companion' are super simple concepts that even a toddler can grasp, making their decision to eschew those options more than a little insulting.
On the other, the average EDH player could probably stand to take a shower more than once a month :B
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
My biggest gripe about losing the 'Banned as Commander' list was that the list was ALREADY IN PLACE and it wasn't hurting anyone. Meanwhile it gave folks who wanted to play specific edge-case legendaries a chance to play them. It was only a positive thing. And then it got taken away for no legitimate reason, and the rationale given at the time boiled down to 'y'all are too dumb to remember two lists.'
I wouldn't have minded if there had never been a list in the first place. Really I wouldn't. But they made it, and it was a good thing, and they took it away while telling us all we're stupid.
****. That.
Banning Lutri is whatever, I wish I got to play with his adorable little otter ass and its sad that he'll never see play anywhere in spite of being so cute, but at least we never really HAD him before losing him.
'Banned as Commander,' however, was absolutely kiboshed explicitly because they didn't think people were smart enough to remember two lists, so forgive me if I'm insulted and suspicious when a committee of knuckle-dragging morons try to tell me something is for the best lol
On one hand, 'Banned as Commander' and 'Banned as Companion' are super simple concepts that even a toddler can grasp, making their decision to eschew those options more than a little insulting.
On the other, the average EDH player could probably stand to take a shower more than once a month :B