That is fair. Of course there are the few cornerstone cases of people just playing mass LD spells just to play them, but those are outliers. The biggest thing for me is the tuck rule only applies for answer cards, I don't see an issue with cards like that being better in this format. Either way I doubt they are going to change it back but it's an interesting discussion
We are sort of derailing the topic with the whole colorless mana rule fix.
Honesty I'm glad people are disgareeing with me. I like hearing the other side of the conversation. I agree that losing a commander is not fun but so is mass LD, stacks, and prison. While mass LD is symmetrical, at best everyone is set the same and at worst they bring it all back or make their lands indestructible. Lands are more important for playing the game baring very specific exceptions. For me the rational of "it's not fun" should mean a lot of other cards need to be on this list.
After hearing Rosewaters take on change to commander, am I the only one that wants the tuck rule back?
I don't like the argument that "because white and blue don't better it would be unfair". White and red are great at mass LD, I think losing all your lands makes it hard to play then losing your commander. I feel like the decks that are all in on their commander should have that sort of weakness. What do we think?