I'm reading through and writing up a long arse post. Please bear with me, I should be back at a decent rate now as uni work has died down, just real work to go.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I am also called Riku. I tend to prefer being called riku.
@Lastwhisper: What I'm seeing right now is a world where you are in a town mindset. I can see a couple of times where you've said something that I'd probably disagree with, but as a whole, there is a lot of townie thoughts coming from you. So, I want to look elsewhere.
Killjoy... Eh, I found him town-lean neutral for now. Both town and scum would consider having a 'ghost vote' on last, though scum would do it to gain some town!cred, as they could hope that a town would hammer which might get the hammering town lynched. These kinds of things aren't really alignment indicative. Actually, his analysis in his post 99 helped me to put him a bit higher for town than scum.
I've put KamikazeKazin in that group as I'm liking some of there thoughts, but I'd like to see more from them.
Wuffles_II: Although I'm townreading last, I disagree that Wuffles is definitely scum. I just feel like last picked up on a stupid logistics joke and started pushing it as though it was extremely indicative. I'd be interested in seeing more content from Wuffles to help with this read.
tom: Being honest, I dislike his thoughts in #72 ("no, that's not quite right
I do nothing to make myself unreadable.
I'm just naturally inscrutable, partially because I don't actually care about winning (like, winning is fun. But it's not the only way), partially because i view mafia as more performance art than anything else so I'm playing a part regardless") and thinking last is scum (Who is my towniest read). And then "If I was scum this game would be on lock already that's hella lynchable people" <-- That's just scummy. 'If I were X' arguments should never be trusted. It's an appeal that scum tend to make.
Vezok: ISO . I really am not liking vezok at all. The tunnel on last, the lack of openness. These are signs of being uncooperative and this is not a good thing as town. If vezok's not scum, he's too focused on last. But, I think he is scum.
vote:Vezokpiraka
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I am also called Riku. I tend to prefer being called riku.
@Lastwhisper: You're going to have to help me here a bit. In regards to Tom, you're saying that if you work in a way around his style, you can get him to give some indicative posts? Relating to RVS, the only one I can see an actual thought process as to why it could be town or scum is Vezok. The others seem kind of arbitrary, so I'd like you to clarify on those, okay? Also, I didn't say you couldn't analyse RVS votes. What I said was that reads based on them are flawed. This goes down into the 'not enough information' category. It's a useful tool, but it shouldn't be used to make final judgement's.
@Wuffles: Can you explain "Actually that makes perfect sense, consider my comment withdrawn said nobody commenting on Tomsloger trolling, ever" . I'm a little confused by this.
@killjoy: "...You know me. Why not RVS me?
I think you actually might be scum. lol. However.
Unvote while discussion happens. I don't want the day suddenly ended in the middle of a thought or something stupid. Consider my vote still on last."
We have more content from last now, so I'd be interested to here if your vote is still 'technically on' him?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I am also called Riku. I tend to prefer being called riku.
@Lastwhisper: I was just a little surprised that you were at L1, that's all. It felt like a train-wreck as scum-reads were everywhere based on RVS. I don't think your reaction was an AI, as scum and town would react in a similar manner at that point in time. I've mentioned it before, but reads based off RVS are heavily flawed.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I am also called Riku. I tend to prefer being called riku.
The first post was just something I disliked, not an indicator. The second part was me talking about that line, which scum do very often.
Killjoy
KamikazeKazin4
Wuffles_II
tomsloger
Vezokpiraka
@Lastwhisper: What I'm seeing right now is a world where you are in a town mindset. I can see a couple of times where you've said something that I'd probably disagree with, but as a whole, there is a lot of townie thoughts coming from you. So, I want to look elsewhere.
Killjoy... Eh, I found him town-lean neutral for now. Both town and scum would consider having a 'ghost vote' on last, though scum would do it to gain some town!cred, as they could hope that a town would hammer which might get the hammering town lynched. These kinds of things aren't really alignment indicative. Actually, his analysis in his post 99 helped me to put him a bit higher for town than scum.
I've put KamikazeKazin in that group as I'm liking some of there thoughts, but I'd like to see more from them.
Wuffles_II: Although I'm townreading last, I disagree that Wuffles is definitely scum. I just feel like last picked up on a stupid logistics joke and started pushing it as though it was extremely indicative. I'd be interested in seeing more content from Wuffles to help with this read.
tom: Being honest, I dislike his thoughts in #72 ("no, that's not quite right
I do nothing to make myself unreadable.
I'm just naturally inscrutable, partially because I don't actually care about winning (like, winning is fun. But it's not the only way), partially because i view mafia as more performance art than anything else so I'm playing a part regardless") and thinking last is scum (Who is my towniest read). And then "If I was scum this game would be on lock already that's hella lynchable people" <-- That's just scummy. 'If I were X' arguments should never be trusted. It's an appeal that scum tend to make.
Vezok: ISO . I really am not liking vezok at all. The tunnel on last, the lack of openness. These are signs of being uncooperative and this is not a good thing as town. If vezok's not scum, he's too focused on last. But, I think he is scum.
vote:Vezokpiraka
@Wuffles: Can you explain "Actually that makes perfect sense, consider my comment withdrawn said nobody commenting on Tomsloger trolling, ever" . I'm a little confused by this.
@killjoy: "...You know me. Why not RVS me?
I think you actually might be scum. lol. However.
Unvote while discussion happens. I don't want the day suddenly ended in the middle of a thought or something stupid. Consider my vote still on last."
We have more content from last now, so I'd be interested to here if your vote is still 'technically on' him?