Carson got in trouble at one point for arguing that we're giving kids "way too many [vaccines] in too short a time". It's not full-on anti-vaxxer/autism stuff, but it's still pretty dangerous advice.
1. A defense against these issues, including Russian connections, was published... by RT (Russia Today), which while that doesn't prove the Jill Stein-Russia connection, it does not make the Stein campaign look good that their best defense is to post that article on their Facebook. For the record, I don't fully buy into that smear. At worst, she's also "unwitting" because the real relationship is that RT provides coverage for 3rd Parties that otherwise would slip into complete obscurity. Edit: Link
2. Someone in a Facebook discussion on her campaign page to the above article remarked that even if all of these Jill Stein allegations were true, she'd still be a better candidate than either two major party candidates. I didn't join the discussion, but I'd only be willing to say that if all these allegations were true, that'd only be true of one of Donald Trump. Other thoughts?
If those accusations are true, then I think she not much better than Trump.
...
I went to one of the links the article provides (It's the one in "Stein simply deleted and replaced her statement "), and read the comments there.
Such vitriol.
And it's always sad to see people act the same, regardless of who they're supporting.
"The Green Party calls for a complete, thorough, impartial, and independent investigation of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, including the role of the administration of George W, Bush, various U.S. based corporations and interests, and other nations and third parties."
Haven't got a clue what to make of that.
Isn't this a reference to an investigation into the Saudi role in 9/11?
I don't think so. I find "including the role of the administration of George W, Bush, various U.S. based corporations and interests," very telling.
I feel like I've heard homeopathy referred to completely different things than what y'all are pointing to, but I'm willing to be wrong. I'll accept alternative medicine as the catch all for what I was referring to.
Alternative medicine, for all intents and purposes, is a catch-all phrase used for medical practices that either haven't been studied extensively under the medical version of the Scientific Method or has been without success.
Then she's a bad candidate and I won't vote for her; If she can't get these arguments right, I'm not interested. I don't byy organic, and I won't buy this either. But, that doesn't change that the green platform is on the whole good.
"The Green Party calls for a complete, thorough, impartial, and independent investigation of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, including the role of the administration of George W, Bush, various U.S. based corporations and interests, and other nations and third parties."
Haven't got a clue what to make of that.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Why is it dangerous advice?
If those accusations are true, then I think she not much better than Trump.
...
I went to one of the links the article provides (It's the one in "Stein simply deleted and replaced her statement "), and read the comments there.
Such vitriol.
And it's always sad to see people act the same, regardless of who they're supporting.
I don't think so. I find "including the role of the administration of George W, Bush, various U.S. based corporations and interests," very telling.
I think it's what Tiax wrote.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeopathy
Alternative medicine, for all intents and purposes, is a catch-all phrase used for medical practices that either haven't been studied extensively under the medical version of the Scientific Method or has been without success.
"The Green Party calls for a complete, thorough, impartial, and independent investigation of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, including the role of the administration of George W, Bush, various U.S. based corporations and interests, and other nations and third parties."
Haven't got a clue what to make of that.