Well the good news is I no longer need to have a discussion with any Trump supporter. I just need to tell them he said he wanted someone to shoot Clinton and if they are okay with that then they aren't worthy of having a conversation.
Trump is probably the better choice you Americans can make. Sure, he's obnoxious, rude, and says a lot of strange things, but that's nothing compared to a corrupt stogie for wall street who most likely has brain damage, either from an accident where she hit her head or syphilis contracted from Billy.
The real problem is that he is both unstable and has no idea what is going on in the world. Last week he didn't even know that Russia had invaded Ukraine. Between the two Trump is far more likely to start a war or initiate nuclear winter because someone insulted his hair piece. Also can you really bring up anything about Bill's sexual history while trying to defend a man who raped at least one of his three wives, hit on his own daughter and has slept with who knows how many pageant contestants? Seems a bit hypocritical don't you think?
Anyway, if it has to be Trump or Hillary then I guess my poison is Trump. Because they're both equally evil to me, so I'm going with spite. I don't take kindly to the way SJWs have tried to hijack this election and threatened (and even enacted) violence upon those who dared defy them. They will no doubt riot and burn our cities when Trump is elected and, as usual, they will blame it on Trump since they are incapable of wrongdoing. But I would compare it to the Garland, Texas case: if someone threatens to kill us for drawing cartoons, I'd rather be with the cartoonists than the killers.
Meanwhile in the real world, Donald Trump doesn't understand why using nuclear weapons would be a bad thing. [link] [other link]
Looking on the bright side, I guess the nuclear winter and depopulation from a limited nuclear exchange would possibly reverse some of the effects of anthropogenic climate change for a while? Also, it's not like anyone is likely to nuke NZ so if Trump gets baited into playing DEFCON IRL I'll probably be fine.
TRUMP2K16: Because On The Beach was a documentary
EDIT
Trump recently mentioned that if he loses the election it's because the election is rigged, tactfully giving his supporters justification to go ape***** if he doesn't win until they get tired of winning. [link]
Holy crap I was reading that article and saw North Korea endorsed Trump. How did I miss that one. How can anyone think this is a good candidate for president?
Unfortunately that is how the dems have decided the game is to be played. Honestly I think the whole primary system needs to be overhauled and redone for consistency and proper representation. Sanders was unable to sway the Dem establishment which is part of winning the nomination. The thing is I can understand the point of super delegates. If the Republicans had them we wouldn't be looking Trump. We would have Bush or Rubio, two choices that wouldn't make me loose sleep at night. Instead we have a racist demagogue straight from the skeleton ridden closets of the Republican party come to enact vengeance on our political system. Still though super delegates should be tallied at the end to avoid influencing voters if the dems are going to keep using them.
Don't forget all the Sanders supporters who actually *were* cheated. There is going to be some serious resentment on all sides.
Even though I would have preferred Sanders he didn't get the numbers and people need to deal with that and move on. Even without the super delegates he trailed by a significant margin. Some shady stuff may have happened but it would not have changed the point difference.
As much as I hate being political, I want to continue to see this man bleed like this.
With these kind of personalities, the only way you can make them forcibly learn anything is through humility. A very harsh form of it. Although in this case I'm not even sure if that would work.
Well when he loses come November (or February in the event of an electoral college uprising) then he will be a loser just like he said about McCain and Romney.
Unfortunately his campaign has been thriving on ineptness for a year now. Its uncanny. I would really love to think that there would be some serious fall off from some of his actions but Trump supporters don't seem to care at all.
Not all states require the electoral college to vote the way their popular vote went; and so that means you can have "faithless" electoral votes, where the electoral college vote differs from what the popular vote says it should be. So, it's entirely possible that Trump could hemorrhage additional electoral votes if those electors don't see him as fit for office. That means that even solid red states may be some shade of purple, making it even harder for the GOP nominee to win a position in government; which frankly might be a good reason for this system to have even been set up.
Well maybe this could have the additional side effect of finally spurring some action on the completely useless electoral college.
I would love to think that Clinton will outshine Trump in the debates and we can finally see this nightmare of an election cycle turn around but I just have a feeling that everyone has likely taken a side at this point. I guess time will tell on this one.
Trump supporters should stop hiding behind this ridiculous defense. He is running for the highest office in the nation do you really want someone who is constantly saying what he doesn't mean in that position? The reality is that your candidate is a hate-mongering liar and if you can't accept that then you should pick another candidate not try to justify his lies, hate speech and misdirection.
Okay so to you it is worse for a person to be careless with classified data than for a person to ask another country to hack into it? I am correct in thinking that? Because that is what you are saying.
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
So yeah. The point stands that it is hypocritical to say anything about Bill's promiscuity while defending Trump.
I don't see how you can call Clinton a demagogue. You may not like her but she does not fit the definition of that term.