He says he is a black man who acts in favor of white people, and at the expense of black people. This implies that white people and black people have distinct characteristics and abilities that can distinguish them as inferior or superior to one another.
Prove this, please.
Because I really have no idea how you came to this belief.
He did not say that the democrats were respectful to Bush or that the republicans were respectful towards Clinton. There are four possible answers to the following question. Which president was disrespected by the opposing party more, Obama, Bush, or Clinton? Obama, Bush, Clinton or neither they were disrespected an equal amount. Now we may never know the answer to that question, but I would actually bet money that the answer is not equally.
I realize. I am more referring to the McConnell comment.
IIRC, Pelosi essentially did the same road-blocking against GWB late into his 2nd presidency when virtually every Democrat claimed to at least dislike him a lot. And Gringrich did the same thing when he and Clinton had their epic showdown during Clinton's first presidency.
What? Wasn't that basically what Pelosi did to GWB?
It's not as if people had George W. Bush = Hitler signs, too.
Oh wait, yes they did.
Pretty sure many die-hard Democrats said Bush is trying to destroy our country/create a police-state too. And some people equated him with the anti-Christ.
The term came out of an attempt by white people in minstrel shows and whatnot to subvert the figure in the book, turning it into an individual who is just subservient to white people and frail and powerless. If you had actually read the book, then you'd realize pretty quickly that Uncle Tom is neither subservient nor powerless and frail.
Later then black people took "ownership" and continued to it use it in that manner.
But people are too quick to categorize things as racist these days. The term isn't racist; as others have mentioned it's derogatory.
“I’ve been in Washington. I saw three presidents now. I never saw George Bush treated like this. I never saw Bill Clinton treated like this with such disrespect," Thompson said, according to audio posted by BuzzFeed. "That Mitch McConnell would have the audacity to tell the president of the United States -- not the chief executive, but the commander-in-chief -- that ‘I don’t care what you come up with we’re going to be against it.’ Now if that’s not a racist statement I don’t know what is.”
What? Wasn't that basically what Pelosi did to GWB?
Or what Gringrich did to Clinton for that matter?
Private Mod Note
():
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Prove this, please.
Because I really have no idea how you came to this belief.
Wait, so when you insinuate that a single man of some ethnicity is subservient, you insinuate that all men of that ethnicity is subservient?
I realize. I am more referring to the McConnell comment.
IIRC, Pelosi essentially did the same road-blocking against GWB late into his 2nd presidency when virtually every Democrat claimed to at least dislike him a lot. And Gringrich did the same thing when he and Clinton had their epic showdown during Clinton's first presidency.
Pretty sure many die-hard Democrats said Bush is trying to destroy our country/create a police-state too. And some people equated him with the anti-Christ.
Later then black people took "ownership" and continued to it use it in that manner.
But people are too quick to categorize things as racist these days. The term isn't racist; as others have mentioned it's derogatory.
What? Wasn't that basically what Pelosi did to GWB?
Or what Gringrich did to Clinton for that matter?